ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04915651Updated Jun 7, 2021

Gallbladder Cryoablation in High-Risk Patients

An interventional study of Gallbladder Cryoablation in Gallbladder Diseases, Cholecystitis and Biliary Colic, sponsored by University of Arizona. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-07.

Sponsored by University of Arizona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Benign gallbladder disease, including acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, biliary dyskinesia, and biliary colic, is very common, with over 300,000 surgical cholecystectomies performed per year in the US. Unfortunately, complication rates in elderly patients or patients with many comorbidities are high. These patients are often managed with percutaneous tube drainage of the gallbladder (percutaneous cholecystostomy). The recurrence rate of calculous cholecystitis after cholecystostomy tube removal is as high as 35% at 1 year. These patients are thus faced with permanent cholecystostomy tube drainage, high-risk surgery, or cholecystostomy tube removal and risk of repeat cholecystitis. Gallbladder cryoablation is an alternative to surgical cholecystectomy which is performed percutaneously and does not require general anesthesia. Published evidence on the outcomes of gallbladder cryoablation is however limited at this point in time. The purpose of the proposed study is to follow the outcomes of high-risk patients who undergo gallbladder cryoablation.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the proposed research is to evaluate the outcomes of gallbladder cryoablation in high-risk surgical candidates with benign gallbladder disease (acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, biliary dyskinesia, biliary colic).

Specific Aim:

Aim 1: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gallbladder cryoablation in high-risk surgical candidates. Patients who undergo gallbladder cryoablation will be followed long-term according to standard of care. This includes scheduled clinic follow up, laboratory analysis, and imaging as needed. We hypothesize that gallbladder cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for high-risk surgical patients with benign gallbladder disease. Clinically, we hypothesize that patients will be free from any clinical symptoms or signs after gallbladder cryoablation and removal of a cholecystostomy tube. These include, but are not limited to right upper quadrant pain, fever, chills, and jaundice.

Aim 2: To evaluate the imaging changes seen in the gallbladder after cryoablation. Imaging is part of routine follow up after percutaneous ablation and may include CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine studies as needed. We hypothesize that after cryoablation, patients will be functionally acholecystic, which occlusion of the cystic duct and involution and fibrosis of the gallbladder demonstrated by imaging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gallbladder Diseases
  • Cholecystitis
  • Biliary Colic
  • Gallstone; Cholecystitis
  • Biliary Dyskinesia
  • Gallstone
  • Gall Bladder Pain

Keywords

  • cryoablation
  • gallstones
  • gallbladder
  • cholecystitis
03

In context

Gallbladder Diseases

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallbladder Diseases; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 72 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Gallbladder Diseases.

Browse Gallbladder Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arizona is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 88 are open to participants now.

Of its 51 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • High-risk surgical candidates with benign gallbladder disease who are not eligible for surgical cholecystectomy and are able to consent to study inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with benign gallbladder disease who are eligible for surgical cholecystectomy or who are unable to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gallbladder Cryoablation

    High-risk patients who undergo gallbladder cryoablation

    Device: Gallbladder Cryoablation

Interventions

  • DeviceGallbladder Cryoablation

    Percutaneous cryoablation of the gallbladder.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptomatic relief

    Absence of right upper quadrant abdominal pain and nausea and absence of repeat episodes of cholecystitis, which would manifest as right upper quadrant abdominal pain associated with a fever (\>100 C) and leukocytosis.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after procedure

  2. Complications

    Clavien-Dindo classification complications

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Imaging

    Imaging evidence of gallbladder devitalization and fibrosis

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04915651
Responsible party
Hugh McGregor (Associate Professor, University of Arizona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 7, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 7, 2021

Study contacts

Hugh McGregor, MD
Contact
hughcjmcgregor@gmail.com
520-626-1069
Hugh McGregor, MD
principal investigator · University of Arizona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion