CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04904757S-CESMUpdated Nov 17, 2022

Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Breast Cancer Screening

An interventional study of Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in Mammographic Breast Density and Mammography, sponsored by University of Virginia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 69 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-17.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2022, 3 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2019, registered Feb 2021).
  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
40 Years to 69 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well women may adopt a Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) as their yearly breast screening test compared to the standard 2-D or 3-D mammogram.

Read the detailed description

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is an FDA approved tool for breast cancer detection. However, adoption into clinical practice has been slow. In this study, we will explore patient issues related to the use of CESM for breast cancer screening. For this study, 210 women with heterogeneous or dense breast tissue reported on a previous mammogram, will be recruited to undergo a screening Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM). The CESM will serve as the subject's annual screening breast exam for clinical care. A survey will be administered before and after the examination that evaluates the patient experience. Women will not be at high risk for breast cancer (\<20% lifetime risk). All abnormal findings will be acted upon independently. Results of the general screening population survey will be compared with those of women who choose to undergo the CESM examination in order to evaluate the influence of age, education, and lifetime risk on decision making about advanced screening.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mammographic Breast Density
  • Mammography
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

    • Female

      • 40 to 69 years
      • Previous normal mammogram (BI-RADS 1 or 2) showing heterogeneous or extremely dense breast tissue within last 24 months
      • Scheduled for screening mammogram as part of the patient's clinical care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • No mammogram within last 24 months

      • Fatty or scattered fibroglandular tissue on last mammogram
      • History of allergy to iodinated contrast
      • History of renal disease or renal function abnormalities
      • Pregnant women
      • History of diabetes
      • History of paraproteinemia syndromes such as multiple myeloma
      • History of collagen vascular disease
      • History of vascular disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, carotid disease, peripheral vascular disease, or known visceral artery disease)
      • Previously identified as high risk for breast cancer (>20% lifetime risk)
      • Asthma
      • Sickle Cell Anemia
      • Currently on Dialysis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    CESM Pre and Post Survey

    Subject will be asked to complete a questionnaire that will ask you about your general attitude toward Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM). Questions will include: * Thoughts regarding risk of breast cancer * Concerns regarding contrast procedures such as the CESM * Past mammogram/breast imaging experience

    Device: Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)

Interventions

  • DeviceContrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)

    CESM is a mammogram performed after the injection of IV contrast. CESM is used most often when additional information is needed after a standard mammogram. CESM has also been used to determine the extent of a known breast cancer, to screen patients at high risk for developing breast cancer due to a family history or positive cancer genes, and for women with dense breast tissue. Two images are taken almost at the same time during the exam, after the iodine based contrast injection is administered. The first image is comparable to a regular mammogram. The second image shows areas that take up the contrast (enhance) showing increased blood flow. Breast cancers often enhance with contrast due to a greater amount of blood vessels. Non-cancerous lesions can also have greater blood flow.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the patient experience during a screening CESM

    Plan for primary variable analysis: To evaluate the patient experience during a screening CESM to better understand if women find the experience of contrast injection to be too invasive or unpleasant to repeat or recommend to a friend. Data summarization: Pre and post CESM survey responses that are binary or Likert scaled responses will be summarized by frequencies and percentages. Pre and post CESM survey responses that are continuous scaled responses will be summarized by the mean and standard deviation, the median and interquartile range, and the range of distribution.

    Time frame: 16 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. determine if there is an association between the willingness to undergo CESM and age, level of education, and breast cancer related risk factors.

    We will evaluate differences by age, education, and risk factors as to whether these drive willingness to undergo CESM. Data summarization: Binary risk factors will be summarized by frequencies and percentages. Continuous scaled risk factors will be summarized by the mean and standard deviation, the median and interquartile range, and the range of distribution.

    Time frame: 16months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UVA Breast Care Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22911, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 14, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Nov 14, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04904757
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Responsible party
Matthew Miller, MD PhD (Radiology-Breast Imaging Faculty, Clinical Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 27, 2021
Start date
Sep 19, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2022

Study contacts

Kathy L Repich, RN
Contact
klr3b@virginia.edu
4342434540
Matthew M Miller, MD
Contact
MM5CA@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion