An interventional study of CGuard Carotid Stent implantation in Carotid Artery Stenosis, sponsored by InspireMD. Recruiting at 17 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-21.
Sponsored by InspireMD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this pivotal study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) to a performance goal developed from published CAS literature.
339 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 81 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 315 is above the median of 106 across 182 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.
Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →InspireMD is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subject is diagnosed with carotid artery disease treatable with carotid artery stenting and is considered high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as evidenced by:
Symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50%. Symptomatic is defined as amaurosis fugax, transient ischemia attack (TIA) or stroke within the last 6 months ipsilateral to the side of the stenosis.
Or
Co-Morbidity High Risk Conditions for CEA, i.e., meets one or more of the following criteria:
OR
High Anatomical Risk for CEA, i.e., meets one or more of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Single experimental arm compared vs. objective performace goal
Device: CGuard Carotid Stent implantation
Implantation of CGuard carotid stent in the eligible patients
Also known as: Carotid stenting
Composite of DSMI through 30 days or ipsilateral stroke 31 - 365 days post-index procedure
The primary endpoint is the composite of the following: * Incidence of the following Major Adverse Events: Death (allcause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through 30-days post-index procedure, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication OR * Ipsilateral stroke from 31-365 day follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.
Time frame: From index procedure to 1 year follow up
Incidence of DSMI through discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and yearly follow ups till 3 years
Incidence of the following composite of Major Adverse Events: Death (all-cause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through discharge, 30-days, 6-months, and 1-,2-,3-year follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.
Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up
Incidence of particular components of DSMI through discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and yearly follow ups till 3 years
Incidence of each individual component of the Major Adverse Events: Death (all-cause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through discharge, 30-days, 6-months, and 1-,2-,3-year follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.
Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up
Incidence of ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.
Ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.
Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up
Incidence of major ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.
Major ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.
Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up
Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) > 70% in ultrasound evaluation
Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) \> 70%. ISR \> 70% is defined as PSV \> 300 cm/s associated with stent, or vessel occlusion based on transcervical duplex ultrasound through 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up. Based on Imaging Core Laboratory assessment.
Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up
Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) > 50% in ultrasound evaluation
Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) \> 50%. ISR \> 50% is defined as PSV \> 220 cm/s associated with stent, or vessel occlusion based on transcervical duplex ultrasound through 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up. Based on Imaging Core Laboratory assessment.
Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up
Incidence of target lesion revascularization
Incidence of Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 1-,2,3-year follow-up. TLR is defined as clinically driven revascularization procedure of the original treatment site, including angioplasty, stenting, endarterectomy, or thrombolysis, performed to open or increase the luminal diameter within the stented lesion or within 5 mm proximal or distal to the index stent.
Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up
Composite of Ipsilateral stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death or other device related clinical events
Ipsilateral stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death or other device related clinical events from discharge up to 1-,2- and 3-year follow-up.
Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up
Composite of DSMI through 30 days or ipsilateral stroke 31 - 365 days post-index procedure for subjects that adhere to antiplatelet pharmacology.
Primary endpoint for subjects that adhere to antiplatelet pharmacology.
Time frame: From index procedure to 1 year follow up
Plan to share: Yes
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
InspireMD