CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04900844C-GuardiansUpdated Jun 21, 2022

Safety and Efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System in Carotid Artery Stenting

An interventional study of CGuard Carotid Stent implantation in Carotid Artery Stenosis, sponsored by InspireMD. Recruiting at 17 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-21.

Sponsored by InspireMD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2022, 4 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2021; still recruiting 5 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
315
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this pivotal study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) to a performance goal developed from published CAS literature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carotid Artery Stenosis

Keywords

  • Carotid Stenosis
  • Stenting
  • Prospective study
  • Embolic Protection Device (EPD)
  • Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Constriction, Pathologic
03

In context

Carotid Stenosis

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Carotid Stenosis; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 315 is above the median of 106 across 182 interventional studies indexed under Carotid Stenosis.

Browse Carotid Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

InspireMD is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject is willing and able to provide appropriate study-specific informed consent, follow protocol procedures, and comply with follow-up visit requirements.
  2. Subject is willing and able to take dual antiplatelet therapy for a minimum of 30 days.
  3. Life expectancy ≥ 24 months from the date of the index procedure.
  4. Females who are not pregnant or lactating and not planning to become pregnant for the duration of the study.
  5. Subject has a modified Rankin Score of ≤ 2at the time of informed consent.
  6. Subject is diagnosed with carotid artery disease treatable with carotid artery stenting and is considered high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as evidenced by:

    1. Symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50%. Symptomatic is defined as amaurosis fugax, transient ischemia attack (TIA) or stroke within the last 6 months ipsilateral to the side of the stenosis.

      Or

    2. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 80%
  7. Co-Morbidity High Risk Conditions for CEA, i.e., meets one or more of the following criteria:

    1. Age ≥ 70 (maximum 80 years)
    2. CCS angina class 3-4 or unstable angina
    3. Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) NYHA class III-IV
    4. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%
    5. MI ≥ 72 hours and \< 6 weeks pre-procedure
    6. Multi-vessel CAD (≥ 2 vessels >70% stenosis) and history of angina
    7. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with FEV1\<50
    8. Permanent contralateral cranial nerve injury/paralysis
    9. Restenosis from previous carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
    10. Planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve replacement surgery between 31-60 days after CAS
    11. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or peripheral vascular surgery is planned between 31 to 60 days after CAS.

    OR

  8. High Anatomical Risk for CEA, i.e., meets one or more of the following criteria:

    1. Occlusion of the contralateral CCA or ICA.
    2. Prior radiation treatment to the neck or a radical neck dissection.
    3. Severe bilateral ICA stenosis requiring treatment.
    4. Target lesion at or above the level of the jaw (C2) or below the clavicle.
    5. Severe tandem lesions
    6. Inability to extend the hear due to cervical disorders.
    7. Laryngeal palsy or laryngectomy.
    8. Prior head and neck surgery in the region of the carotid artery.
    9. Tracheostomy or tracheostoma.
    10. Spinal immobility of the neck.
    11. Hostile neck or surgically inaccessible lesion.
  1. Angiographic General Inclusion Criteria, i.e., meets all the following criteria:
  1. Target lesion location at the carotid bifurcation and/or proximal internal carotid artery (ICA)
  2. Vessel distal to target lesion can accommodate a distal embolic protection device (EPD), and EPD is compatible with CGuard™ device (refer to CGuard™ System IFU for specific EPDs).
  3. Target vessel reference diameter at stent landing zone is 4.8 mm to 9.0 mm.
  4. Target lesion length ≤ 36 mm, that can be covered by a single CGuard™ stent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Planned interventional procedure or surgery of the carotid, coronary or peripheral arteries within 30 days before or after the index carotid procedure.
  2. Severe vascular anatomy that would preclude safe sheath insertion, deliverability of stent or embolic protection device.
  3. Type III or bovine aortic arch.
  4. Total occlusion of the target vessel.
  5. Presence of "String sign" of the target lesion.
  6. In-tandem lesions with >= 50% or >= 80% diameter stenosis for symptomatic or asymptomatic patients, respectively, which cannot be covered by a single CGuard™ stent.
  7. History of bleeding diatheses or coagulopathy or inability to accept blood transfusions.
  8. Bilateral carotid stenosis requiring treatment on both sides within 30 days prior to or following planned index procedure.
  9. Subject is on renal replacement therapy or has Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).
  10. Known reason for potential stroke other than carotid artery stenosis, including history of atrial fibrillation or other sources of thromboemboli within the past 12 months.
  11. History of thrombophilia.
  12. Known sensitivity or allergy to nitinol, titanium, heparin, aspirin or other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies.
  13. Contrast media sensitivity or allergy that cannot be pre-treated.
  14. Previous stent placement in the target vessel.
  15. Evolving stroke or intracranial hemorrhage, or history of previous intracranial hemorrhage or brain surgery within the past 12 months.
  16. Major neurologic deficit with NIHSS of ≥ 15.
  17. Dementia or other neurologic condition confounding the neurologic assessment.
  18. Clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes endovascular therapy impossible or hazardous.
  19. Subject previously enrolled in this clinical trial.
  20. Possible / probable non-compliance of subject with protocol required follow up or medication.
  21. Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not completed its primary endpoint assessment or would confound this C-GUARDIANS Pivotal IDE Clinical Study.
  22. SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) active infection.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
315 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CGuard group

    Single experimental arm compared vs. objective performace goal

    Device: CGuard Carotid Stent implantation

Interventions

  • DeviceCGuard Carotid Stent implantation

    Implantation of CGuard carotid stent in the eligible patients

    Also known as: Carotid stenting

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of DSMI through 30 days or ipsilateral stroke 31 - 365 days post-index procedure

    The primary endpoint is the composite of the following: * Incidence of the following Major Adverse Events: Death (allcause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through 30-days post-index procedure, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication OR * Ipsilateral stroke from 31-365 day follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 1 year follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of DSMI through discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and yearly follow ups till 3 years

    Incidence of the following composite of Major Adverse Events: Death (all-cause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through discharge, 30-days, 6-months, and 1-,2-,3-year follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up

  2. Incidence of particular components of DSMI through discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and yearly follow ups till 3 years

    Incidence of each individual component of the Major Adverse Events: Death (all-cause mortality), all Stroke, and Myocardial Infarction (DSMI) through discharge, 30-days, 6-months, and 1-,2-,3-year follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up

  3. Incidence of ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.

    Ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up

  4. Incidence of major ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.

    Major ipsilateral stroke through discharge, 30 days, 6 months and 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up

  5. Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) > 70% in ultrasound evaluation

    Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) \> 70%. ISR \> 70% is defined as PSV \> 300 cm/s associated with stent, or vessel occlusion based on transcervical duplex ultrasound through 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up. Based on Imaging Core Laboratory assessment.

    Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up

  6. Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) > 50% in ultrasound evaluation

    Incidence of In-stent Restenosis (ISR) \> 50%. ISR \> 50% is defined as PSV \> 220 cm/s associated with stent, or vessel occlusion based on transcervical duplex ultrasound through 1-, 2-, 3-year follow-up. Based on Imaging Core Laboratory assessment.

    Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up

  7. Incidence of target lesion revascularization

    Incidence of Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) through 1-,2,3-year follow-up. TLR is defined as clinically driven revascularization procedure of the original treatment site, including angioplasty, stenting, endarterectomy, or thrombolysis, performed to open or increase the luminal diameter within the stented lesion or within 5 mm proximal or distal to the index stent.

    Time frame: At 1-, 2-, 3-year post-index procedure follow-up

  8. Composite of Ipsilateral stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death or other device related clinical events

    Ipsilateral stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death or other device related clinical events from discharge up to 1-,2- and 3-year follow-up.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 3 years follow up

  9. Composite of DSMI through 30 days or ipsilateral stroke 31 - 365 days post-index procedure for subjects that adhere to antiplatelet pharmacology.

    Primary endpoint for subjects that adhere to antiplatelet pharmacology.

    Time frame: From index procedure to 1 year follow up

07

Study locations

17 of 17 sites recruiting
  • University of Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
    Recruiting
  • Oschner Health
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
    Recruiting
  • Ascension, St. John Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48236, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mercy Hospital
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
    Recruiting
  • University of Buffalo
    Buffalo, New York 14203, United States
    • Shelby Halm · Contact · shalm@ubns.com
    • Adnan Siddiqui, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
    Recruiting
  • Novant Health
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44103, United States
    • Carmen Czich, RN, BSN, CCRP · Contact · czichc@ccf.org
    • Sean Lyden, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • UPMC-Pinnacle
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, United States
    • Gretchen Meise, RN, BSN, CCRC · Contact · meisegc@upmc.edu
    • William Bachinsky, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Miriam Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02906, United States
    Recruiting
  • Prisma Health-Upstate
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
    Recruiting
  • Avera Heart Hospital
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108, United States
    • Robin Farley, RN · Contact · rfarley@ncheart.com
    • Michael Bacharach, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Ballad CVA Heart Institute
    Kingsport, Tennessee 37660, United States
    Recruiting
  • Turkey Creek Medical Center
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37934, United States
    Recruiting
  • Ascension Seton, Seton Heart Institute
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
    Recruiting
  • Leszek Leic Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University
    Katowice, Poland
    Recruiting
  • John Paul II Hospital
    Kraków, Poland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04900844
Lead sponsor
InspireMD
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 21, 2022

Study contacts

Christina Brennan
Contact
christinab@inspiremd.com
888-776-6804
Chris Metzger, MD
principal investigator · Ballad Health
Piotr Musialek, MD DPhil
principal investigator · John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion