ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04900740Updated Sep 11, 2023

Evaluation of Tissue Glue on PICC and Midline Catheters Insertion Sites

An interventional study of Catheter fixation with surgical stitch and Catheter fixation with glue (cyanoacrylate tissue glue Secure PortIV) in Adult Patients With Mid-term or Long-term Venous Access, sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava. Recruiting at 1 site in Czechia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-11.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2021; still recruiting 5 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will evaluate a new type of cyanoacrylate tissue glue Secure PortIV on the insertion site of the PICC (Peripherally inserted central catheter) or Midline catheters. Fixation of the catheter with the tissue glue should prevent incidents of mechanical and infective phlebitis as well as external migrations of the catheters.

Read the detailed description

In the study, 125 subjects will receive the new tissue glue Secure PortIV and 125 subjects will be provided standard care. The tissue glue will be applied immediately after insertion. Evaluation and re-evaluation of the site will be done on the first and seventh day after insertion using VIP and CLISA (Central-Line Insertion Site Assessment) scale and on the seventh day with taking a swab from the insertion site; the external length will be measured on the first and the seventh day, in order to observe the migration or not.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the benefits of the cyanoacrylate tissue glue Secure PortIV in the prevention of mechanical and infective phlebitis and external migration of the catheter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Patients With Mid-term or Long-term Venous Access

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • peripherally inserted central catheter
  • midline
  • cyanoacrylate tissue glue
  • tissue glue
  • phlebitis
  • catheter migration
03

In context

Phlebitis

45 studies on the registry are indexed under Phlebitis; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 134 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Phlebitis.

Browse Phlebitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava is the lead sponsor of 148 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age
  • need of long-term venous access
  • consent with participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pediatric population
  • not signing the form
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard care - catheter fixation with surgical stitch

    In patients indicated for this type of treatment, as per the attending physician, the catheter will be fixed in the standard way, using a surgical stitch.

    Device: Catheter fixation with surgical stitch

  • Experimental
    Experimental - catheter fixation with glue

    In patients indicated for this type of treatment, as per the attending physician, the catheter will be fixed using the glue.

    Device: Catheter fixation with glue (cyanoacrylate tissue glue Secure PortIV)

Interventions

  • DeviceCatheter fixation with surgical stitch

    The catheter will be fixed using the standard procedure - surgical stitch.

  • DeviceCatheter fixation with glue (cyanoacrylate tissue glue Secure PortIV)

    The catheter will be fixed using the experimental procedure - novel surgical glue.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The incidence of mechanical and infective phlebitis

    The incidence of mechanical and infective phlebitis will be measured in the group with the cyanoacrylate tissue glue in comparison with the standard treatment

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The incidence of external migration of the catheter

    The incidence of external migration of the catheter will be measured in the group with the cyanoacrylate tissue glue in comparison with the standard treatment

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region 708 52, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Jiří Hynčica · Contactjiri.hyncica@fno.cz · 0042059737
    • Iveta Constantine, Bc., MSc. · Principal investigator
    • Andrea Polanská, PhDr., MBA · Sub investigator
    • Magda Michalíková, DiS · Sub investigator
    • Zuzana Figurová · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Scoppettuolo G, Dolcetti L, Emoli A, La Greca A, Biasucci DG, Pittiruti M. Further benefits of cyanoacrylate glue for central venous catheterisation. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jun;70(6):758. doi: 10.1111/anae.13105. No abstract available. PubMed 25959189 ↗
  • Di Puccio F, Giacomarro D, Mattei L, Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G. Experimental study on the chemico-physical interaction between a two-component cyanoacrylate glue and the material of PICCs. J Vasc Access. 2018 Jan;19(1):58-62. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000816. PubMed 29148010 ↗
  • Seckold T, Walker S, Dwyer T. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and postinsertion complication rates: a systematic review. J Vasc Access. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):167-77. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000330. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25634150 ↗
  • Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, Meyer BM, Nickel B, Rowley S, Sharpe E, Alexander M. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396. No abstract available. PubMed 33394637 ↗
  • Di Giacomo M. Comparison of three peripherally-inserted central catheters: pilot study. Br J Nurs. 2009 Jan 8-21;18(1):8-16. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.32071. PubMed 19127226 ↗
  • Igarashi A, Okuno T, Shimizu T, Ohta G, Ohshima Y. Mechanical stimulation is a risk factor for phlebitis associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter in neonates. Pediatr Int. 2021 May;63(5):561-564. doi: 10.1111/ped.14476. Epub 2021 May 7. PubMed 32964580 ↗
  • Walshe LJ, Malak SF, Eagan J, Sepkowitz KA. Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3276-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.135. PubMed 12149302 ↗
  • Pinelli F, Balsorano P, Mura B, Pittiruti M. Reconsidering the GAVeCeLT Consensus on catheter-related thrombosis, 13 years later. J Vasc Access. 2021 Jul;22(4):501-508. doi: 10.1177/1129729820947594. Epub 2020 Aug 8. PubMed 32772785 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2021 to primary completion in Jan 2023, 20 months.

Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Phlebitis, half reached primary completion within 8 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 16. This study's 20 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2021
First posted
May 25, 2021
StartActual
May 4, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 2024
Last update
Sep 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04900740
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2021
Start date
May 4, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2023

Study contacts

Jiří Hynčica
Contact
jiri.hyncica@fno.cz
0042059737 ext. 2587
Iveta Constantine, Bc., MSc.
principal investigator · University Hospital Ostrava

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion