CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04891224Updated Mar 24, 2025Results posted

Use of a Digitally Enabled App With Clinical Team Interface in the Management of Depression

An interventional study of Pathway Platform mobile app in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-24.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was conducted to understand the use of a mobile app (titled Pathway) to help patients track depression symptoms, medications, side effects, and goals in addition to the usual care with their doctor. Investigators compared the effect of the app over 6 months and examine whether the app can increase engagement between patients and their doctor and help in the management of illnesses as patients started a new treatment for depression. The investigators hoped that using an app to facilitate management of depression symptoms, medication use, and side effects help patients and their providers understand their response to medications and lead to better response and improvements in depression.

Read the detailed description

A pre- and post- study design was utilized to assess the impact of implementing the Pathway Platform in the primary care setting. The Pathway Platform consists of a mobile app for patients and a care team interface that can be accessed through Epic (electronic medical record system). Eight primary care sites were identified to participate in the study. Care team members involved in depression management received education on evidence-based clinical practices for depression care, such as measurement-based care practices and shared- decision making. Clinics with behavioral resources also received additional education on behavioral health integration. Training on how to onboard patients to use the Pathway Platform and utilize electronic medical records to view data collected in the Pathway Platform was also provided. Study outcomes identified in this protocol are described among patients enrolled in the Pathway Platform (post-implementation cohort) as well as a similar group of patients from the same participating clinics prior to study implantation (pre-implantation cohort). Implementation success was evaluated by comparing study outcomes among these two cohorts. The primary outcome is PHQ-9 utilization over six months are compared between the pre- and post- implementation cohorts. Additional process measures compared include; shared-decision making, medication adjustments, referrals to behavioral health, primary care follow-up post hospitalizations, and depression remission and response. Data collected in the Pathway Platform is also used to explore pre-defined patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • PHQ-9, Shared decision making
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 89 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis with major depressive disorder or reference to "clinical depression" in patient charts.
  • Recently prescribed monotherapy antidepressant medication (defined as new start, medication switch, or dose change in the past 3 months.)
  • Patients with inadequate response or tolerability concerns determined based on A PHQ-2 score of 3 or greater or a PHQ-9 score of 5 or more, recorded in medical records in the past 6 weeks or during screening,
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Able to use the Pathway Platform based on clinician's judgment, e.g. owns an iPhone version 5 or later or smartphones with Android operating systems, have an active data plan or regular WiFi access

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing PHQ-2 score in the past 6 weeks and/or unable to perform PHQ-2 at index visit
  • Diagnosis with bipolar depression, schizophrenia, and/or schizoaffective disorder
  • Patient no longer under primary care for depression and has transitioned to a psychiatric care team (i.e., Psychiatrist, Advance Practice Psychiatric Nurse, Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric Physician Assistant).
  • Lack of functional English literacy (indicated by primary language in electronic medical record).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Pathway Platform application use

    Study participants will download the Pathway app to their mobile device. This app will gather patient health data, present standardized questionnaires and research data collection tools. Subject responses will be visible to their provider via interface with the electronic medical record.

    Other: Pathway Platform mobile app

Interventions

  • OtherPathway Platform mobile app

    The pathway platform intervention involves 3 components: 1. The patient facing app which will: a) Gather health information related to depression management and patient-Provider engagement. b) Clinical data collection; PHQ-9, WHO-5, PDQ-D-5, medication adherence and side effects, goal setting and goal tracking. c) Research data; Patient Activation Measure -13\[PAM-13\], CollaboRATE, and Work and Social Adjustment Scale \[WSAS\]. 2. Electronic Medical Record Integration - a) Data collected in the app is accessible to care team in real time. b) Provide a longitudinal summary to assist in decision making and depression management. 3. Educational Scaffolding - a) Training program describing how the Pathway Platform can support care team members in clinical processes related to measurement-based care and shared-decision making. b) Includes ongoing feedback with up to three audit cycles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Who Completed Patient Health Questionnaire

    Proportion of patients who have at least 2 Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores documented in their medical record over the 6 month study period will be compared between pre- and post- Pathway app implementation to determine if there is a change in adherence to measurement based care practices following the implementation of the Pathway Platform in a primary care setting.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

Secondary outcomes

  1. Process Outcome: Measurement-based Care

    The proportion of patients reflecting measurement-based care informed major depression disorder treatment adjustments in their charts, defined as at lease one medication dose change, switch or add on medication.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  2. Process Outcome: Shared-decision Making

    The proportion of patients reflecting shared-decision making using the OPTION12 Tool framework.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app

  3. Process Outcome: Referrals to Behavioral Health

    The proportion of patients with at least one referral will be compared.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  4. Process Outcome: Total Number of Hospitalized Participants During Follow up Period

    The number who receive follow-up within 7 days of discharge and within 30 days of discharge.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.

  5. Process Outcome: Follow-up After Emergency Department Visit for Mental Illness

    The proportion of adults who receive follow-up within 7 days of discharge and within 30 days of emergency department visit.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  6. Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Hospital Admissions

    The number of hospital admissions among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  7. Process Outcome: Number of Behavioral Related Hospitalizations

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.

  8. Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Emergency Room Admissions

    The number of emergency room admissions among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  9. Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Outpatient Visits

    The number of outpatient encounters among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.

  10. Process Outcome: Primary Care Physician (PCP) Visits

    The costs associated with health care services among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study. Costs will be calculated using USA national average costs for inpatient and outpatient visits.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.

  11. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score

    Median Patient Health Questionnaire-9 \[PHQ-9\] scores \<=5 at the end of the study period. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0-27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. The last measurement available will be used to calculate remission. For participants 'Baseline' refers to the PHQ9 value the patient entered on the day they downloaded the app. For pre-implementation controls 'Baseline' refers to the PHQ value from the EHR on the qualifying visit.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  12. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score Reduction

    Number of patients with a 50 percent or greater reduction in PHQ-9 scores. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0-27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. A 50 percent reduction in score reflects significant improvement in depression. The first and last scores available during the study period will be used to calculate response.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Outcomes: Patient Activation Measure-13 [PAM-13]

    This tool consists of 13 statements used to describe one's health. Patients rate each statement on a likert scale from Disagree Strongly (1) to Agree Strongly (4). Sum scores are categorized into levels of activation with higher scores indicating a patient's readiness to take action. The difference between baseline and 6-month follow up will be compared among patients using the Pathway Platform.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month post-Pathway app use

  2. Patient Reported Outcomes: CollaboRATE

    CollaboRATE is a process measure of shared decision making between patients and clinicians. Scores from this questionnaire range from 0 -100 with higher scores reflecting more shared decision making. Scores from this tool will be analyzed across 3 time-points.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-Pathway app use.

  3. Patient Reported Outcomes: Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

    This tool consists of 5 questions related to a patient's perception of how his/her current problem impairs his/her ability to carry out normal activities. Items are ranked from 0 (not impairing abilities at all) to 8 (very severely impairing abilities). Resulting scores range from 0-40 with higher scores reflecting more severe psychopathology. Baseline and post-Pathway app use scores will be compared among patients using the Pathway Platform.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month post-Pathway app use

  4. Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]

    The difference in PHQ-9 scores will be compared in all patients who completed this scale at 2 time points. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0 - 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. The difference between two scores and the direction of the change will reflect degree of improvement or decline.

    Time frame: 6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app

  5. Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: World Health Organization- Five Well Being Index [WHO-5]

    The WHO-5 asks patients to rate 5 indices of wellbeing on a 5 point likert scale; 0 being the worst, 5 being the best. Resulting scores range from 0-25, the higher the score, the better the perceived quality of life. Changes in scores will be compared in patients who completed this scale at 2 time points.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-month post-Pathway app use

  6. Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D5]

    The PDQ-5 asks patients to respond to five questions representing four subscales: Attention/Concentration, Retrospective Memory, Prospective Memory, and Planning/Organization. Total PDQ-5 score consists of the sum of the raw scores on these 5 items and could range from 0-20 with higher scores indicating greater perceived deficit. The difference in PDQ-D5 scores will be compared in all patients who completed this scale at 2 time points.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6-month post-Pathway app use

  7. Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Reported Therapeutic Response to Antidepressant Medication Plan.

    This Patient Clinical and reported outcome summarizes patient self-reported adherence to antidepressant medication plan as prescribed will be described.

    Time frame: throughout 6-month of Pathway app use

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size and high attrition rates in both cohorts.

Participant flow

Pathway platform was implemented with interested PCPs from 8 primary care sites. Pre- implementation control cohort was created by identifying potentially eligible patients retrospectively from EHR. Post-implementation Pathway Cohort - The first participant was enrolled in on 7/21/21 and last participant was enrolled on 7/2/22.

Screening
Participant flow — Screening
MilestonePre-Implementation CohortPathway Participants
Started9089
Completed9089
Not completed00
Enrollment
Participant flow — Enrollment
MilestonePre-Implementation CohortPathway Participants
Started9089
Completed9089
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Patients Who Completed Patient Health Questionnaire

Proportion of patients who have at least 2 Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores documented in their medical record over the 6 month study period will be compared between pre- and post- Pathway app implementation to determine if there is a change in adherence to measurement based care practices following the implementation of the Pathway Platform in a primary care setting.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of Patients Who Completed Patient Health Questionnaire
participantsPre-Implementation CohortPathway Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Completed Patient Health Questionnaire3549
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Measurement-based Care

The proportion of patients reflecting measurement-based care informed major depression disorder treatment adjustments in their charts, defined as at lease one medication dose change, switch or add on medication.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Number · participants
Process Outcome: Measurement-based Care
participantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Measurement-based Care3840
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Shared-decision Making

The proportion of patients reflecting shared-decision making using the OPTION12 Tool framework.

Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryProcess Outcome: Referrals to Behavioral Health

The proportion of patients with at least one referral will be compared.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Number · participants
Process Outcome: Referrals to Behavioral Health
participantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Referrals to Behavioral Health218
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Total Number of Hospitalized Participants During Follow up Period

The number who receive follow-up within 7 days of discharge and within 30 days of discharge.

Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Process Outcome: Total Number of Hospitalized Participants During Follow up Period
ParticipantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Total Number of Hospitalized Participants During Follow up Period1923
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Follow-up After Emergency Department Visit for Mental Illness

The proportion of adults who receive follow-up within 7 days of discharge and within 30 days of emergency department visit.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Process Outcome: Follow-up After Emergency Department Visit for Mental Illness
ParticipantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Follow-up After Emergency Department Visit for Mental Illness30
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Hospital Admissions

The number of hospital admissions among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Number · participants
Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Hospital Admissions
participantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Hospitalizations1923
Behavioral health related hospitalization40
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Number of Behavioral Related Hospitalizations
Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Process Outcome: Number of Behavioral Related Hospitalizations
ParticipantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Number of Behavioral Related Hospitalizations40
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Emergency Room Admissions

The number of emergency room admissions among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Emergency Room Admissions
ParticipantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Emergency Room Admissions115
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Outpatient Visits

The number of outpatient encounters among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study.

Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.
Reported as:
Number · number of units
Process Outcome: Healthcare Resource Utilization, Outpatient Visits
number of unitsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Number of ED Visits115
Number of Behavioral Health-Related ED Visits115
Number of Outpatient Visits216243
SecondaryProcess Outcome: Primary Care Physician (PCP) Visits

The costs associated with health care services among patients receiving care at a clinic participating in this study. Costs will be calculated using USA national average costs for inpatient and outpatient visits.

Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway Platform app.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryPatient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score

Median Patient Health Questionnaire-9 \[PHQ-9\] scores \<=5 at the end of the study period. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0-27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. The last measurement available will be used to calculate remission. For participants 'Baseline' refers to the PHQ9 value the patient entered on the day they downloaded the app. For pre-implementation controls 'Baseline' refers to the PHQ value from the EHR on the qualifying visit.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Median · median PHQ-9 total score
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score
median PHQ-9 total scorePre-Implementation CohortPathway Participants
PHQ-9 Median Score: Baseline14.5 (11.0 to 27.0)12 (9.0 to 17.0)
3-months11.0 (8.5 to 12.5)8.5 (3.0 to 15.0)
6-months17.0 (14.5 to 20.0)6.5 (3.0 to 12.5)
SecondaryPatient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score Reduction

Number of patients with a 50 percent or greater reduction in PHQ-9 scores. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0-27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. A 50 percent reduction in score reflects significant improvement in depression. The first and last scores available during the study period will be used to calculate response.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score Reduction
participantsPre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] Score Reduction27
Other pre-specifiedPatient Reported Outcomes: Patient Activation Measure-13 [PAM-13]

This tool consists of 13 statements used to describe one's health. Patients rate each statement on a likert scale from Disagree Strongly (1) to Agree Strongly (4). Sum scores are categorized into levels of activation with higher scores indicating a patient's readiness to take action. The difference between baseline and 6-month follow up will be compared among patients using the Pathway Platform.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6-month post-Pathway app use
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcomes: Patient Activation Measure-13 [PAM-13]
score on a scalePathway Participants (N=89)
Patient Reported Outcomes: Patient Activation Measure-13 [PAM-13]4 (-5 to 13)
Other pre-specifiedPatient Reported Outcomes: CollaboRATE

CollaboRATE is a process measure of shared decision making between patients and clinicians. Scores from this questionnaire range from 0 -100 with higher scores reflecting more shared decision making. Scores from this tool will be analyzed across 3 time-points.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-Pathway app use.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedPatient Reported Outcomes: Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)

This tool consists of 5 questions related to a patient's perception of how his/her current problem impairs his/her ability to carry out normal activities. Items are ranked from 0 (not impairing abilities at all) to 8 (very severely impairing abilities). Resulting scores range from 0-40 with higher scores reflecting more severe psychopathology. Baseline and post-Pathway app use scores will be compared among patients using the Pathway Platform.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6-month post-Pathway app use
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient Reported Outcomes: Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
score on a scalePathway Participants (N=89)
Patient Reported Outcomes: Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)-4 (-14 to 6)
Other pre-specifiedExploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]

The difference in PHQ-9 scores will be compared in all patients who completed this scale at 2 time points. Scores from this nine item questionnaire can range from 0 - 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression. The difference between two scores and the direction of the change will reflect degree of improvement or decline.

Time frame:
6 months prior to and 6 months post-implementation of the Pathway app
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]
score on a scalePre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]2 (1 to 3)4 (2.5 to 4.5)
Other pre-specifiedExploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: World Health Organization- Five Well Being Index [WHO-5]

The WHO-5 asks patients to rate 5 indices of wellbeing on a 5 point likert scale; 0 being the worst, 5 being the best. Resulting scores range from 0-25, the higher the score, the better the perceived quality of life. Changes in scores will be compared in patients who completed this scale at 2 time points.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6-month post-Pathway app use
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: World Health Organization- Five Well Being Index [WHO-5]
score on a scalePathway Participants (N=89)
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: World Health Organization- Five Well Being Index [WHO-5]3 (-1 to 7)
Other pre-specifiedExploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D5]

The PDQ-5 asks patients to respond to five questions representing four subscales: Attention/Concentration, Retrospective Memory, Prospective Memory, and Planning/Organization. Total PDQ-5 score consists of the sum of the raw scores on these 5 items and could range from 0-20 with higher scores indicating greater perceived deficit. The difference in PDQ-D5 scores will be compared in all patients who completed this scale at 2 time points.

Time frame:
Baseline to 6-month post-Pathway app use
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D5]
score on a scalePathway Participants (N=89)
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D5]4 (0 to 8)
Other pre-specifiedExploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Reported Therapeutic Response to Antidepressant Medication Plan.

This Patient Clinical and reported outcome summarizes patient self-reported adherence to antidepressant medication plan as prescribed will be described.

Time frame:
throughout 6-month of Pathway app use
Reported as:
Number · participants
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Reported Therapeutic Response to Antidepressant Medication Plan.
participantsPathway Participants (N=89)
Exploratory - Patient Clinical and Reported Outcomes: Patient Reported Therapeutic Response to Antidepressant Medication Plan.87

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through week 75. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pathway Platform Application Use0/89 (0%)5/89 (5.6%)10/89 (11.2%)
Pre-Implementation Cohort Retrospective Control Group Identified From Study Sites.———
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPathway Platform Application UsePre-Implementation Cohort Retrospective Control Group Identified From Study Sites.
Attempted Overdose hospitalizationPsychiatric disorders1/89—
Hospitalization for CholecystectomyGastrointestinal disorders1/89—
D & C procedurePregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/89—
Mitral Valve repairCardiac disorders1/89—
DizzinessEar and labyrinth disorders1/89—
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPathway Platform Application UsePre-Implementation Cohort Retrospective Control Group Identified From Study Sites.
Carpel tunnel surgeryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/89—
Scar RepairSurgical and medical procedures1/89—
L sided chest pain, ED visitInvestigations1/89—
Abdominal pain/Ovarian cyst ruptureNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/89—
Observational hospitalization for abnormal vaginal bleedingReproductive system and breast disorders1/89—
L Breast Mass ExcisionReproductive system and breast disorders1/89—
Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions (renal)Surgical and medical procedures1/89—
ED visit AnxietyGeneral disorders1/89—
ED Visit Cellulitis R handSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/89—

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Median39 (28 to 57)35 (28 to 46)37 (37 to 51)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Female5271123
Male381856
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Race/Ethnicity , N (%) — White504191
Race/Ethnicity , N (%) — Hispanic / Latino161632
Race/Ethnicity , N (%) — Black142943
Race/Ethnicity , N (%) — Other10313
Type of Insurance
Type of Insurance(Participants)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Medicare14620
Commercial5968127
Medicaid171532
Qualifying PHQ Score
Qualifying PHQ Score(units on a scale)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Median14 (11 to 17)15 (12 to 18)15 (10 to 18)
Medications at the qualifying visit
Medications at the qualifying visit(Participants)Pre-Implementation Cohort (N=90)Pathway Participants (N=89)Total
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)6967136
Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs)7310
Alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists (Tetracyclics ) - Mirtazapine213
Tricyclic Agents011
Serotonin Modulators101
Trintellix000
Bupropion111728
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Advocate Christ Medical Center
    Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PubMed 11556941 ↗
  • Lam RW, Lamy FX, Danchenko N, Yarlas A, White MK, Rive B, Saragoussi D. Psychometric validation of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D) instrument in US and UK respondents with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 29;14:2861-2877. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S175188. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30464471 ↗
  • Krieger T, Zimmermann J, Huffziger S, Ubl B, Diener C, Kuehner C, Grosse Holtforth M. Measuring depression with a well-being index: further evidence for the validity of the WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) as a measure of the severity of depression. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 25. PubMed 24412323 ↗
  • Chen X, Hu N, Wang Y, Gao X. Validation of a brain-computer interface version of the digit symbol substitution test in healthy subjects. Comput Biol Med. 2020 May;120:103729. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103729. Epub 2020 Mar 25. PubMed 32250858 ↗
  • Buysse DJ, Yu L, Moul DE, Germain A, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Shablesky-Cade MA, Pilkonis PA. Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep. 2010 Jun;33(6):781-92. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.6.781. PubMed 20550019 ↗
  • McGahuey CA, Gelenberg AJ, Laukes CA, Moreno FA, Delgado PL, McKnight KM, Manber R. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Jan-Mar;26(1):25-40. doi: 10.1080/009262300278623. PubMed 10693114 ↗
  • Vortel MA, Adam S, Port-Thompson AV, Friedman JM, Grande SW, Birch PH. Comparing the ability of OPTION(12) and OPTION(5) to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Mar 24. PubMed 27085518 ↗
  • Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x. PubMed 16336556 ↗
  • Forcino RC, Barr PJ, O'Malley AJ, Arend R, Castaldo MG, Ozanne EM, Percac-Lima S, Stults CD, Tai-Seale M, Thompson R, Elwyn G. Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):82-89. doi: 10.1111/hex.12588. Epub 2017 Jul 5. PubMed 28678426 ↗
  • Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 May;180:461-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461. PubMed 11983645 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 21, 2022
  • Informed consent form · May 9, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04891224
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Collaborators
Takeda, Lundbeck LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2021
Start date
Feb 19, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2023
Completion
Jan 30, 2023
Results posted
Mar 24, 2025
Last update
Mar 24, 2025

Study contacts

David Kemp, MD
principal investigator · Advocate Medical Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion