CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04886557Updated May 14, 2021

Retrospective Image Analysis of Degenerative Lumbar Disease Patients

An observational study in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-14.

Sponsored by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
139
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Dynesys dynamic stabilization (DDS) system is considered a motion-preserving device. However, studies addressing the change in the range of motion (ROM) are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the factors influencing ROM change at the index surgical level, supra-index level, and whole lumbar spine, in addition to the association between ROM preservation and the incidence of screw-loosening.

Read the detailed description

Decompression with instrumented fusion is an effective surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. However, the range of motion (ROM) decreased at the index surgical level may lead to an increased ROM at the non-surgical level, increase biomechanical stress at the transitional adjacent segment, and lead to adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) .

The Dynesys dynamic stabilization (DDS) system is a pedicle screw-based, motion-preserving, and non-fusion stabilization developed as an alternative to the rigid instrumented fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The aim of the DDS is to maintain segmental motion at index levels and to reduce the incidence of ASD. However, the actual impact of ROM has remained elusive. Prior studies have reported an average ROM loss of 1.1º to 17.3º 7 at index surgical level at an average of 24 months follow-up.

The change of ROM at index surgical, supra-index, and whole lumbar spine following DDS remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the ROM change at index surgical level, supra-index level, and whole lumbar spine, and the association between ROM preservation and the incidence of screw-loosening.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dynesys dynamic stabilization, range of motion
03

In context

Spondylolisthesis

237 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylolisthesis; 47 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 139 is above the median of 121 across 80 observational studies indexed under Spondylolisthesis.

Browse Spondylolisthesis studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 325 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis over L4-L5 who failed to respond to conservative treatment for at least 6 months and received Dynesys instrumentation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients
  • Diagnosed with degenerative spondylolisthesis over L4-L5
  • Received DDS
  • Received a minimum of 2-year follow-up were reviewed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of degenerative scoliosis or spinal deformity,
  • prior spine surgery,
  • lost to follow-up, or
  • failure to complete the questionnaires or radiographic examinations.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
139 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • DDS fixation

    Adult patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis over L4-L5 received DDS with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were reviewed. Surgical indications were patients who failed to respond to conservative treatment for at least 6 months. The exclusion criteria were: (1) presence of degenerative scoliosis or spinal deformity, (2) prior spine surgery, (3) lost to follow-up, or (4) failure to complete the questionnaires or radiographic examinations.

    Procedure: L4-L5 decompression and dynamic instrumentation

Interventions

  • ProcedureL4-L5 decompression and dynamic instrumentation

    All surgeries were performed by a senior surgeon using a traditional midline approach. Stability-preserving lumbar decompression with facet joint undercutting was performed to preserve the facet joints as much as possible. In cases of severe stenosis, a bilateral partial facetectomy (\< 25%) was performed for adequate decompression. Posterior tension of the supra- and inter-spinous ligaments was preserved at the most cranial level. Patients were encouraged to ambulate after drain removal and wear a soft lumbar orthosis for at least 3 months after the operation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of motion

    The ROM change at index surgical level, supra-index level, and whole lumbar spine in degenerative lumbar diseased patients received dynesys dynamic instrumentation

    Time frame: All patients completed the follow-up assessment at postoperative 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Screw loosening

    Radiographic screw-loosening was defined as presence of a halo or double-halo sign on plain x-ray films

    Time frame: All patients completed the follow-up assessment at postoperative 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dep. of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 112, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • St-Pierre GH, Jack A, Siddiqui MM, Henderson RL, Nataraj A. Nonfusion Does Not Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease: Dynesys Long-term Outcomes With Minimum Five-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(3):265-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001158. PubMed 26335675 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04886557
Lead sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2021
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2018
Last update
May 14, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion