ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04875650Updated May 6, 2021

Physics Forceps vs Conventional Forceps in Extraction of Mandibular Molars

An interventional study of Extraction of Mandibular Molar using Physics Forceps and Extraction of Mandibular Molar using Conventional Forceps in Tooth Extraction, sponsored by Melaka Manipal Medical College. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-06.

Sponsored by Melaka Manipal Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2020, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our study compared two different forceps for extraction of mandibular molars, the conventional extraction forceps and the Physics forceps. We assesed the relative pain score, patient satisfaction, success of extraction, incidence of alveolar plate fracture and soft tissue healing; post extraction. Our results found statistical significance in comparison of both forceps under relative pain score, patient satisfaction and soft tissue healing post extraction.

Read the detailed description

Abstract

  • INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND Tooth extractions are commonly done with conventional forceps. Recent advances like physics forceps help in atraumatic extractions by preserving the buccal plate, having less pain and better gingival healing. The buccal portion of the forceps is a plastic covered bumper which prevents reflection of buccal gingiva and buccal plate fracture. This is the first such comparison study to measure gingival healing in mandibular molar region with D2 bone quality.
  • OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of Physics Forceps and Conventional Forceps in extraction of mandibular molars by randomly dividing the patients in two groups. The efficacy is determined by comparing the success of extraction, relative pain score, incidence of alveolar fracture, patient satisfaction and soft tissue healing on 3rd post-operative day.
  • METHODOLOGY Patients who were indicated for extraction were included in the study. They were divided into two groups of 10 by double blinded randomization. Local Anesthesia was administered and the extraction was carried out using either Physics or Conventional forceps. Post extraction, the pain score was assessed using the VAS. Along with these, the gingival healing, success of extraction and alveolar plate fracture was assessed by the subject expert on the 3rd day post-operative day.
02

Conditions studied

  • Tooth Extraction
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Melaka Manipal Medical College is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 18-55 years
  • Mandibular molar teeth indicated for extractions with gingival index 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases, that compromise dental extraction
  • Mandibular 3rd Molars
  • Grade 2 and 3 mobile teeth
  • Grossly decayed mandibular molars
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Physics Forceps

    Procedure: Extraction of Mandibular Molar using Physics Forceps

  • Other
    Conventional Forcep

    Procedure: Extraction of Mandibular Molar using Conventional Forceps

Interventions

  • ProcedureExtraction of Mandibular Molar using Physics Forceps

    Extraction of mandibular molars using physics forceps

  • ProcedureExtraction of Mandibular Molar using Conventional Forceps

    Extraction of mandibular molars using conventional forceps

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative Pain Score

    Use of a Visual Analogue Scale with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning severe pain

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Soft Tissue Healing Post Extraction

    Soft Tissue Healing Index by Landry et al.

    Time frame: Day 3

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    4 point likert scale where 1 is very dissatisfied and 4 is very satisfied

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Success of Extraction

    1 is Failure, 2 is limited success with osteotomy, 3 is limited success with root fracture, 4 is limited success with apical fracture and 5 is complete success

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Incidence of Alveolar Bone Fracture

    Fracture 1 and No fracture 0

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Melaka Manipal Medical College
    Melaka, 75150, Malaysia
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04875650
Lead sponsor
Melaka Manipal Medical College
Responsible party
Auric Bhattacharya (Principal Investigator, Associate Professor, Melaka Manipal Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 6, 2021
Start date
Dec 2, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2021
Completion
Apr 20, 2021
Last update
May 6, 2021

Study contacts

Auric Bhattacharya, BDS, MDS, FICOI, MFDS, RCPS
principal investigator · Melaka Manipal Medical College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion