CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04874896Updated Sep 13, 2023

Influence of the Intestinal Microbiota on the Clinical Course of Renal Transplantation

An interventional study of Microbiota autotransplantation and Control in Renal Transplant, sponsored by Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-13.

Sponsored by Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2020, registered Apr 2021).
  • Started Dec 2020; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ACKGROUND: The development of new molecular techniques, in recent years, has increasing the knowledge of the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota. In the area of kidney transplantation, observational studies have described a change in the intestinal microbiota during the immediate post-transplantation period that seems to be related to the appearance of clinical outcomes such as diarrhea, repeated urinary tract infections, the need for adjustment of immunosuppressive treatment or acute rejection. However, intervention studies on this subject are necessary to determine how far the microbiota can influence in the development of these events.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the influence of maintaining the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota on post-transplant clinical outcomes such as diarrhea, urinary tract infections, kidney graft rejection and the need for dose adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: single-center, randomized, interventional pilot study with 50 deceased kidney donor transplant patients at low immunological risk. Each patient will be randomized at the time of inclusion in the study to one of the 2 branches of the study: 1) Intervention group: 25 patients who will receive a autologous fecal matter transfer during the first 6 months post-transplantation, 2) Control group: 25 renal transplant patients with the same characteristics who will not receive any type of intervention in addition to the immunosuppressive treatment indicated according to hospital protocol.

Read the detailed description

ACKGROUND: The development of new molecular techniques, in recent years, has increasing the knowledge of the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota. In the area of kidney transplantation, observational studies have described a change in the intestinal microbiota during the immediate post-transplantation period that seems to be related to the appearance of clinical outcomes such as diarrhea, repeated urinary tract infections, the need for adjustment of immunosuppressive treatment or acute rejection. However, intervention studies on this subject are necessary to determine how far the microbiota can influence in the development of these events.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the influence of maintaining the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota on post-transplant clinical outcomes such as diarrhea, urinary tract infections, kidney graft rejection and the need for dose adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: single-center, randomized, interventional pilot study with 50 deceased kidney donor transplant patients at low immunological risk. Each patient will be randomized at the time of inclusion in the study to one of the 2 branches of the study: 1) Intervention group: 25 patients who will receive a autologous fecal matter transfer during the first 6 months post-transplantation, 2) Control group: 25 renal transplant patients with the same characteristics who will not receive any type of intervention in addition to the immunosuppressive treatment indicated according to hospital protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Renal Transplant

Browse trials for

03

In context

Disease Progression

544 studies on the registry are indexed under Disease Progression; 144 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 87 across 266 interventional studies indexed under Disease Progression.

Browse Disease Progression studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantation over 18 years of age, able to understand the informed consent form and who have agreed to participate in the study. Only patients with low immunological risk, whose induction for kidney transplantation was performed with basiliximab will be included, regardless of the maintenance immunosuppression combination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplant with high immunological risk (within the PATHI kidney transplant program).
  • Kidney transplant recipients receiving pretransplant induction with thymoglobulin or polyclonal lymphocyte antiglobulin agents.
  • Living donor kidney transplant recipients.
  • Patients with a history of intestinal pathology such as: ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or malabsorptive syndrome or irritable colon prior to their inclusion in the kidney transplant waiting list.
  • Patients with dysphagia, history of aspiration pneumonia or neutropenia prior to transplantation.
  • Patients who, even if they meet the inclusion criteria, upon analysis of pretransplant stool, are found to be carriers of enterotoxigenic or potentially pathogenic strains such as Clostridioides difficile, or multiresistant bacteria (BLEE and/or carbapenemase-producing).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Patients of this branch will not have autotransplantation of gut microbiota in capsules and will follow their usual post-transplant treatment

    Dietary Supplement: Control

  • Active comparator
    Microbiota autotransplantation

    Patients in this branch will receive autotransplantation of intestinal microbiota in capsules for 6 months post-transplantation

    Dietary Supplement: Microbiota autotransplantation

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementMicrobiota autotransplantation

    Patients received microbiota autotransplantation in capsules (1g per day) for 6 months

  • Dietary supplementControl

    Patients will not received microbiota autotransplantation in capsules and will received usual medical care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the occurrence of diarrhea

    Evaluate the occurrence of diarrhea regardless of its cause, between the intervention and control groups. Diarrhea will be defined as three or more bowel movements per day (or more frequently than normal for the individual), and presence of loose or liquid stools, following WHO definition

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of post-transplant urinary tract infections

    Evaluate the occurrence of post-transplant urinary tract infections (UTI), defined as positive urine culture with associated voiding symptoms or fever, as well as positive urine cultures until removal of the double J catheter, given that they will receive antibiotic treatment as if it were a UTI. Positive urine cultures or asymptomatic bacteriuria after removal of the double J catheter (usually at one-month post-transplantation) will not be included in the definition.

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation

  2. Evaluate the dose/level ratio of immunosuppressive drugs

    Evaluate the dose/level ratio of immunosuppressive drugs (tacrolimus or everolimus) administered in the intervention groups with respect to the control group

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation

  3. Evaluate the proportion of acute rejection episodes

    Evaluate the proportion of acute rejection episodes between the two groups in the follow-up period

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation

  4. Determined Treg lymphocyte populations

    Evaluate whether there are differences between the Treg lymphocyte populations in peripheral blood by flow cytometry between the two groups

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation compared to pre transplant situation

  5. Systemic inflammation

    Measurement of inflammatory markers in serum by automated systems, such as C-reactive protein

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation

  6. Production of bacterial metabolites

    Determination of the short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) concentration as bacterial metabolites in feces and urine by LC-MS/MS as indicators of the functionality of the microbiota

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation compared to pre transplant situation

  7. Analysis of the bacteria composing the microbiota

    Analysis of the bacteria composing the microbiota by massive sequencing of the 16S rDNA gene

    Time frame: 6 months after transplantation compared to pre transplant situation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04874896
Lead sponsor
Fundacion para la Investigacion Biomedica del Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 13, 2023

Study contacts

Esmeralda Castillo Rodríguez, MD
Contact
esmeralda.castle@gmail.com
913368018
Andrea Collado Alsina, PhD
Contact
macolladoalsina@gmail.com
913368018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion