CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04873700RISE-MXUpdated Nov 7, 2024Results posted

A Study of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Including Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD)

An observational study in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Colitis, Ulcerative and Crohn Disease, sponsored by Takeda. Completed at 12 sites in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-07.

Sponsored by Takeda · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
335
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main aim of this study is to check the disease activity in people with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

Participants will complete questionnaires about their disease and quality of life on Day 1 clinic visit. They will do this during a standard scheduled appointment with their doctor. Some of this study will also involve collecting information about participants from their medical records.

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, and non-interventional study of participants with moderate to severe IBD (UC or CD). The study will have a cross-sectional evaluation on Day 1 to provide the real-world data of disease activity, treatment patterns, burden of disease and quality of life in participants with moderate to severe UC or CD.

The study will involve an additional retrospective review of medical charts of participants of previous 3 years to describe the IBD treatments and use of other healthcare resources related with the management of UC or DC.

The study will enroll approximately 335 participants. All participants will be enrolled in one observational cohort.

This multi-center trial will be conducted in Mexico. The overall time for data collection in the study will be approximately 3 years before the start of the study (Day 1).

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Colitis, Ulcerative
  • Crohn Disease

Keywords

  • Drug Therapy
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 335 is above the median of 105 across 247 observational studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Takeda is the lead sponsor of 1,002 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Of its 173 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 149 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult participants diagnosed with moderate to severe UC or CD will be enrolled.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosed with moderate to severe CD or UC established for at least 6 months prior to Day 1 appointment, based on clinical, endoscopic or image criteria.
  2. Participants aged 18 years or older (at the time of diagnosis of moderate to severe UC or CD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has indeterminate or not classified colitis.
  2. Mental incapacity, unwillingness or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
335 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

    Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease (CD) were observed on Day 1 for cross-sectional evaluation of disease activity, treatment patterns, burden of disease and quality of life along with retrospective data collection for previous 3 years prior to Day 1 to assess the IBD treatments and use of other healthcare resources related with the management of CD.

  • Mild to None Crohn's Disease

    Participants diagnosed with mild to none activity of CD were observed on Day 1 for cross-sectional evaluation of disease activity, treatment patterns, burden of disease and quality of life along with retrospective data collection for previous 3 years prior to Day 1 to assess the IBD treatments and use of other healthcare resources related with the management of CD.

  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

    Participants diagnosed with moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) were observed on Day 1 for cross-sectional evaluation of disease activity, treatment patterns, burden of disease and quality of life along with retrospective data collection for previous 3 years prior to Day 1 to assess the IBD treatments and use of other healthcare resources related with the management of UC.

  • Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis

    Participants diagnosed with mild to none activity of UC were observed on Day 1 for cross-sectional evaluation of disease activity, treatment patterns, burden of disease and quality of life along with retrospective data collection for previous 3 years prior to Day 1 to assess the IBD treatments and use of other healthcare resources related with the management of UC.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Active CD at Day 1

    Percentage of participants with active CD observed, where active CD was defined as Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 8 or Crohn's disease active index (CDAI) \>=220. CDAI assessed CD based on clinical signs and symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general wellbeing, presence of comorbid conditions, use of antidiarrheal, physical examination and laboratory findings. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher score indicates more severe disease. HBI score was used to measure disease activity of CD and consisted of 5 clinical parameters: general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications. Total score is sum of individual parameters. Score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on number of liquid stools, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Percentage of Participants With Active UC at Day 1

    Percentage of participants with active disease UC disease will be observed, where UC is defined as 9-point Partial Mayo Score (pMayo score) \>=5. The Mayo score is composed of four categories (bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopic appearance) rated from 0-3 that are summed into a total score ranging from 0-12. pMayo score consists of 3 sub scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician global assessment of disease severity, each graded from 0 to 3. These scores are summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease. The pMayo score when compared with the full Mayo score and categorizes UC patients as being in remission (score of 0 to 2), having mild activity (pMayo of 3 or 4) or moderate to severe activity (pMayo of \>=5).

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With CD Based on Clinical Presentation

    Number of participants will be reported based on the clinical presentations (location, behavior, perianal disease, achievement of ileal disease and extraintestinal manifestations for CD participants). Clinical presentations that have data for at least one participant in the below categories are reported. Data is reported for participants with CD only.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Number of Participants With UC Based on Clinical Presentation

    Number of participants will be reported based on the clinical presentations (location, behavior, and extraintestinal manifestations,). Clinical presentations that have data for at least one participant in the below categories are reported. Data is reported for participants with UC only.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Number of Participants With UC or CD Based on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Therapies

    Number of participants will be reported based on the IBD therapies which include aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators, immunosuppressants, biologics, antibiotics, probiotics, and surgeries. A participant can receive more than one IDB therapy.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  4. Duration of IBD Therapies

    Time between the beginning of IBD therapy until the end of treatment or Day 1, whichever comes first. IBD therapies include aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators, immunosuppressants, biologics, antibiotics, probiotics, and surgeries.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  5. Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Biologic-experience

    Percentage of participants who have experienced any biologic therapy (examples, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, certolizumab) once or more than once according to medical history until the day 1. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  6. Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Have Not Responded Previously to Biologic Therapies

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  7. Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Reasons for Non-response to Previous Biologic Therapies

    Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  8. Number of Participants With UC or CD Introduced With IBD Treatment at Day 1

    The IBD treatment categories that have data for at least one participant are reported.

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Number of Participants With HBI >=8 or CDAI >=220 Points Versus HBI <8 or CDAI <220 Points Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in CD Participants

    CDAI assessed clinical signs and symptoms: number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general wellbeing, presence of comorbid conditions, use of antidiarrheal, physical examination and laboratory findings. Total score ranges from 0-600 points. Higher score indicates more severe disease. HBI score measures disease activity of CD based on 5 clinical parameters: general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass, and complications. Total score is sum of individual parameters. Score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on number of liquid stools, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, professional status, educational level, participant income. Clinical variables included duration and age at diagnosis, steroid dependence or refractoriness, family history, medical history and comorbidities, criteria used for diagnosis, calprotectin and EIM.

    Time frame: Day 1

  10. Number of Participants With pMayo Score >=5 Versus pMayo Score <5 Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in UC Participants

    Mayo score is composed of 4 categories (bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopic appearance) rated from 0-3 that are summed into a total score ranging from 0-12. pMayo score consists of 3 sub scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician global assessment of disease severity, each graded from 0 to 3. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease. The pMayo score when compared with the full Mayo score and categorizes UC patients as being in remission (score of 0-2), having mild activity (pMayo of 3-4) or moderate to severe activity (pMayo \>=5). Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, professional status, educational level, participant income. Clinical variables included duration and age at diagnosis, steroid dependence or refractoriness, family history, medical history and comorbidities, criteria used for diagnosis, calprotectin and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM).

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Mean Score of Components of 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) of UC or CD Participants

    SF-36 is a general quality of life (QoL)-questionnaire, which evaluates 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, bodily pain, role physical (limitations due to physical problems), role emotional (limitations due to personal or emotional problems), mental health, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. Based on these 8 dimensions, two weighted scores were generated: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Mean score of each component (physical component and mental component) was reported.

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Mean Total Score of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) of UC or CD Participants

    The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire that measured 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms, and social function. Within dimensions, each question presented seven possible answers/points. Each domain score was the sum of 8 responses each ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicated worst function and 7 the best. The sub-score ranged from 8 to 56 and thus the total score ranged from 32 to 224, where higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: Day 1

  13. Mean of Percentage of Total Work Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) in UC or CD Participants

    WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean total percentage of work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms) were reported in terms of hours.

    Time frame: The last 7 days prior to Day 1

  14. Mean of Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

    WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean work time missed (absenteeism) was reported.

    Time frame: The last 7 days prior to Day 1

  15. Mean of Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

    WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean impairment while working (presentisms) was reported.

    Time frame: The last 7 days prior to Day 1

  16. Mean Percentage of Total Activity Impairment Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

    WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Unemployed participants only answered to questions related to employment status and regular activities impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Mean total activity impairment was reported.

    Time frame: The last 7 days prior to Day 1

  17. Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Quit Their Job Due to IBD and Unable to Return to Work

    Percentages are rounded off at the nearest single decimal.

    Time frame: Day 1

  18. Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Categorized Based on Healthcare Resources

    Healthcare resources included hospitalizations, medical appointments, imaging, and laboratory testing. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  19. Total Direct Medical Cost for Participants With UC or CD

    A cost analysis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD) was developed, classified by severity as mild and moderate-severe for each of the conditions. Direct medical costs were considered and included the following items: associated comorbidities, intestinal manifestations, surgical procedures, emergency visits, hospitalizations, medical appointments, follow-up studies, and previous pharmacological treatments; this was collected in the study including the number of participants and the proportion of them that presented the items studied. The total direct medical cost for all participants with each of the conditions was obtained, with the average 3-year cost per participant for UC and for CD multiplied by the number of all participants with UC and CD respectively. So, the values reported in the data table below represent the total direct cost for all participants with UC and CD respectively. The total direct cost was in Mexican Peso(MXN).

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

  20. Indirect Cost for Participants With UC or CD

    A cost analysis of UC and CD was developed, classified by severity as mild and moderate-severe for each condition. Indirect cost was estimated by using number of hours missed from work (absenteeism) multiplied by average hourly labor cost including wages and benefits, to calculate average lost productivity cost per participant due to absenteeism during specified duration. Hours missed from work were assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI-GH) questionnaire, in which respondents answered 6 questions related to work productivity and impairment.The indirect medical cost for all participants with each of the conditions was obtained,with the average 3-year cost per participant for UC and for CD multiplied by the number of all employed participants with UC and CD respectively. So, values reported in data table below represent the indirect cost in totality for all employed participants with UC and CD respectively. The indirect cost is in MXN.

    Time frame: From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2024

Participant flow

Participants took part in the study at approximately 12 investigative sites in Mexico from 30 August 2021 to 17 May 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Started435242189
Completed435242189
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Active CD at Day 1

Percentage of participants with active CD observed, where active CD was defined as Harvey Bradshaw index (HBI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 8 or Crohn's disease active index (CDAI) \>=220. CDAI assessed CD based on clinical signs and symptoms such as number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general wellbeing, presence of comorbid conditions, use of antidiarrheal, physical examination and laboratory findings. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher score indicates more severe disease. HBI score was used to measure disease activity of CD and consisted of 5 clinical parameters: general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications. Total score is sum of individual parameters. Score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on number of liquid stools, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Active CD at Day 1
percentage of participantsCrohn's Disease
Percentage of Participants With Active CD at Day 145.3 (35.3 to 55.3)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Active UC at Day 1

Percentage of participants with active disease UC disease will be observed, where UC is defined as 9-point Partial Mayo Score (pMayo score) \>=5. The Mayo score is composed of four categories (bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopic appearance) rated from 0-3 that are summed into a total score ranging from 0-12. pMayo score consists of 3 sub scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician global assessment of disease severity, each graded from 0 to 3. These scores are summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease. The pMayo score when compared with the full Mayo score and categorizes UC patients as being in remission (score of 0 to 2), having mild activity (pMayo of 3 or 4) or moderate to severe activity (pMayo of \>=5).

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Active UC at Day 1
percentage of participantsUlcerative Colitis
Percentage of Participants With Active UC at Day 118.2 (13.2 to 23.2)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With CD Based on Clinical Presentation

Number of participants will be reported based on the clinical presentations (location, behavior, perianal disease, achievement of ileal disease and extraintestinal manifestations for CD participants). Clinical presentations that have data for at least one participant in the below categories are reported. Data is reported for participants with CD only.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With CD Based on Clinical Presentation
ParticipantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's Disease
Location: Ileal(L1)09
Location: L1+Isolated Upper GI Tract Disease(L4)01
Location: Colonic Disease (L2)15
Location: L2 + L410
Location: Ileocolic(L3)411
Behavior: Non stenosing/non penetrating010
Behavior: Stenosing (B2)512
Behavior: B2+Perianal Disease (P)02
Behavior: Penetrating (B3)11
Behavior: B3+P01
Perianal Disease: None423
Perianal Disease: Indolent Fistula03
Perianal Disease: Active Fistula10
Perianal Disease: Hemorrhoids10
Ileal Disease: Achievement ≥1319
Ileal Disease: Achievement <133
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Peripheral arthritis34
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Aphthous ulcers02
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Episcleritis01
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Uveitis11
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Osteoporosis01
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Anemia20
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Hematological alteration01
Extraintestinal Manifestations: Other120
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.0701p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.1383p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.0478p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.1454p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.4992p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.2022p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease vs Mild to None Crohn's Disease · Chi-squared · p = =0.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With UC Based on Clinical Presentation

Number of participants will be reported based on the clinical presentations (location, behavior, and extraintestinal manifestations,). Clinical presentations that have data for at least one participant in the below categories are reported. Data is reported for participants with UC only.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With UC Based on Clinical Presentation
ParticipantsModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Location - Distal UC: Proctitis(E1)210
Location - Distal UC: Proctosigmoiditis(E1)314
Location - Left sided: Mucosa inflammation extending up to splenic flexure(E2)522
Location - Pancolitis: Mucosa inflammation up to proximal transverse colon and beyond(E3)452
Behavior - clinical remission (asymptomatic)(S0)043
Behavior - mild UC(S1)534
Behavior - moderate UC(S2)818
Behavior - severe UC(S3)13
Extraintestinal manifestations - Peripheral arthritis123
Extraintestinal manifestations - Pyoderma gangrenosum02
Extraintestinal manifestations - Aphthous ulcers01
Extraintestinal manifestations - Primary sclerosing cholangitis01
Extraintestinal manifestations - Osteoporosis02
Extraintestinal manifestations - Anemia33
Extraintestinal manifestations - Hematological alteration01
Extraintestinal manifestations - Other1070
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =0.2896p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =0.0006p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =0.0890p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =0.0752p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =1.0000p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
  • Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis vs Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis · Chi-squared · p = =0.1032p-value was obtained from Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With UC or CD Based on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Therapies

Number of participants will be reported based on the IBD therapies which include aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators, immunosuppressants, biologics, antibiotics, probiotics, and surgeries. A participant can receive more than one IDB therapy.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With UC or CD Based on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Therapies
ParticipantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Sulfasalazine (SSZ)11614
Mesalazine (5-ASA)202536140
Olsalazine0011
Mesalazine extended release23552
Hydrocortisone43517
Prednisone18231977
Prednisolone0023
Budesonide59742
Methylprednisolone0010
Azathioprine14191281
6-mercaptopurine0203
Methotrexate4310
Infliximab139946
Adalimumab2122426
Vedolizumab1149
Certolizumab4100
Golimumab0023
Ustekinumab13821
Metronidazole3024
Ciprofloxacin2010
Other1431144
Salicylic derivatives + Immunosuppressants101927122
Biologic therapy + Immunosuppressants121414
Salicylic derivatives + Immunosuppressants + Biologic therapy19181360
SecondaryDuration of IBD Therapies

Time between the beginning of IBD therapy until the end of treatment or Day 1, whichever comes first. IBD therapies include aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators, immunosuppressants, biologics, antibiotics, probiotics, and surgeries.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of IBD Therapies
monthsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Sulfasalazine (SSZ)0.2 (NA to NA)—33.3 (17.0 to 42.0)62.3 (40.3 to 84.3)
Mesalazine (5-ASA)42.1 (3.7 to 111.1)34.3 (18.6 to 50.0)8.4 (0.2 to 347.2)54.3 (0.6 to 138.1)
Mesalazine Extended release31.0 (NA to NA)———
Olsalazine——60.0 (NA to NA)—
Hydrocortisone0.1 (0.10 to 0.13)0.1 (NA to NA)0.2 (0.2 to 0.3)0.1 (0.0 to 0.3)
Prednisone5.0 (0.9 to 207.4)2.9 (1.1 to 83.9)1.6 (0.7 to 182.0)3.0 (0.1 to 148.5)
Prednisolone———3.2 (NA to NA)
Budesonide——2.0 (1.3 to 12.4)2.8 (1.4 to 18.0)
Azathioprine40.3 (2.7 to 111.1)38.6 (4.1 to 96.31)1.5 (0.06 to 153.5)45.5 (0.2 to 181.8)
Methotrexate4.9 (3.8 to 6.0)—0.7 (NA to NA)—
Metronidazole0.2 (NA to NA)—0.2 (0.2 to 0.2)0.2 (0.2 to 0.3)
Ciprofloxacin——0.2 (NA to NA)—
Infliximab10.3 (0.8 to 17.0)62.3 (5.5 to 89.8)21.9 (3.1 to 73.4)14.2 (0.75 to 181.4)
Adalimumab27.5 (0.19 to 125.2)34.27 (5.3 to 103.8)28.6 (NA to NA)27.5 (0.1 to 125.2)
Vedolizumab———9.0 (NA to NA)
Ustekimumab66.5 (50.4 to 82.6)1.0 (NA to NA)——
Certolizumab15.7 (3.9 to 132.0)———
Golimumab——0.3 (NA to NA)—
Other:23.8 (0.2 to 47.4)—2.8 (0.1 to 128.2)4.5 (0.1 to 103.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Biologic-experience

Percentage of participants who have experienced any biologic therapy (examples, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, certolizumab) once or more than once according to medical history until the day 1. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Biologic-experience
percentage of participantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Biologic-experience72.061.533.033.8
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Have Not Responded Previously to Biologic Therapies

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Have Not Responded Previously to Biologic Therapies
percentage of participantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Have Not Responded Previously to Biologic Therapies65.125.028.520.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Reasons for Non-response to Previous Biologic Therapies

Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Based on Reasons for Non-response to Previous Biologic Therapies
percentage of participantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Poor effectiveness34.815.311.99.5
Patient decision6.9000
Remission0001.0
Unknown004.72.1
Patient poor adherence2.33.801.0
Comorbidity0000.5
Adverse reaction4.6003.7
Patient access to treatment6.9000.5
Antibodies2.31.900.5
Serum level of antidrug01.900
Other6.91.911.91.0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With UC or CD Introduced With IBD Treatment at Day 1

The IBD treatment categories that have data for at least one participant are reported.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With UC or CD Introduced With IBD Treatment at Day 1
ParticipantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Sulfasalazine (SSZ)0102
Mesalazine (5-ASA)0012
Mesalazine extended release0002
Prednisone0122
Budesonide0103
Azathioprine0110
Infliximab0001
Adalimumab1000
Vedolizumab1100
Ustekinumab0100
Metronidazole0010
Ciprofloxacin0010
Other1012
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HBI >=8 or CDAI >=220 Points Versus HBI <8 or CDAI <220 Points Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in CD Participants

CDAI assessed clinical signs and symptoms: number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general wellbeing, presence of comorbid conditions, use of antidiarrheal, physical examination and laboratory findings. Total score ranges from 0-600 points. Higher score indicates more severe disease. HBI score measures disease activity of CD based on 5 clinical parameters: general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools/day, abdominal mass, and complications. Total score is sum of individual parameters. Score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on number of liquid stools, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, professional status, educational level, participant income. Clinical variables included duration and age at diagnosis, steroid dependence or refractoriness, family history, medical history and comorbidities, criteria used for diagnosis, calprotectin and EIM.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HBI >=8 or CDAI >=220 Points Versus HBI <8 or CDAI <220 Points Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in CD Participants
ParticipantsCrohn's Disease
Number of Participants With HBI >=8 or CDAI >=220 Points Versus HBI <8 or CDAI <220 Points Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in CD Participants43
SecondaryNumber of Participants With pMayo Score >=5 Versus pMayo Score <5 Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in UC Participants

Mayo score is composed of 4 categories (bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopic appearance) rated from 0-3 that are summed into a total score ranging from 0-12. pMayo score consists of 3 sub scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician global assessment of disease severity, each graded from 0 to 3. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease. The pMayo score when compared with the full Mayo score and categorizes UC patients as being in remission (score of 0-2), having mild activity (pMayo of 3-4) or moderate to severe activity (pMayo \>=5). Socio-demographic variables included age, sex, professional status, educational level, participant income. Clinical variables included duration and age at diagnosis, steroid dependence or refractoriness, family history, medical history and comorbidities, criteria used for diagnosis, calprotectin and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM).

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With pMayo Score >=5 Versus pMayo Score <5 Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in UC Participants
ParticipantsUlcerative Colitis
Number of Participants With pMayo Score >=5 Versus pMayo Score <5 Categorized Based on Socio-demographic, Clinical and Treatment-related Variables in UC Participants42
SecondaryMean Score of Components of 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) of UC or CD Participants

SF-36 is a general quality of life (QoL)-questionnaire, which evaluates 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, bodily pain, role physical (limitations due to physical problems), role emotional (limitations due to personal or emotional problems), mental health, social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. Based on these 8 dimensions, two weighted scores were generated: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Mean score of each component (physical component and mental component) was reported.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Score of Components of 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) of UC or CD Participants
score on a scaleModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Physical Functioning64.2 ± 28.4377.5 ± 24.1071.1 ± 25.8981.1 ± 22.97
Bodily Pain52.7 ± 28.1265.0 ± 27.9057.5 ± 29.3670.6 ± 26.09
Role Physical55.5 ± 28.8762.9 ± 28.2951.8 ± 26.6369.9 ± 25.43
Role Emotional55.6 ± 28.5162.2 ± 26.8957.1 ± 28.0770.6 ± 24.04
Mental Health56.6 ± 20.4360.9 ± 19.8256.5 ± 22.6264.8 ± 19.39
Social Functioning53.8 ± 29.1966.6 ± 25.0959.2 ± 28.7069.7 ± 26.81
Vitality43.9 ± 20.3053.7 ± 21.2349.4 ± 22.5557.2 ± 20.56
General Health43.4 ± 20.6448.0 ± 23.5943.4 ± 22.2653.6 ± 23.62
SecondaryMean Total Score of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) of UC or CD Participants

The IBDQ was a 32-item questionnaire that measured 4 dimensions: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms, and social function. Within dimensions, each question presented seven possible answers/points. Each domain score was the sum of 8 responses each ranging from 1 to 7, where 1 indicated worst function and 7 the best. The sub-score ranged from 8 to 56 and thus the total score ranged from 32 to 224, where higher score indicating better quality of life.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Total Score of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) of UC or CD Participants
score on a scaleModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Mean Total Score of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) of UC or CD Participants144.8 ± 42.78159.03 ± 36.00140.2 ± 43.67165.7 ± 33.85
SecondaryMean of Percentage of Total Work Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) in UC or CD Participants

WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean total percentage of work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms) were reported in terms of hours.

Time frame:
The last 7 days prior to Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of total work impairment
Mean of Percentage of Total Work Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) in UC or CD Participants
Percentage of total work impairmentModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Mean of Percentage of Total Work Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) in UC or CD Participants20.337 ± 19.225221.184 ± 21.486024.152 ± 15.638617.700 ± 19.6796
SecondaryMean of Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean work time missed (absenteeism) was reported.

Time frame:
The last 7 days prior to Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of work time missed
Mean of Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants
percentage of work time missedModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Mean of Percentage of Work Time Missed Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants19.873 ± 30.699517.285 ± 25.13369.798 ± 16.333210.590 ± 23.7578
SecondaryMean of Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Employed participants were evaluated for this outcome measure. Mean impairment while working (presentisms) was reported.

Time frame:
The last 7 days prior to Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Impairment
Mean of Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants
Percentage of ImpairmentModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Mean of Percentage of Impairment While Working Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants33.3 ± 33.8530.0 ± 30.4029.5 ± 22.6923.1 ± 25.92
SecondaryMean Percentage of Total Activity Impairment Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants

WPAI assessed the impact of IBD on work productivity and daily activities during the previous 7 days. The WPAI included 6 questions: 1 (if currently employed); 2 (hours missed due to disease); 3 (hours missed other reasons); 4 (hours actually worked); 5 (degree disease affected productivity while working); 6 (degree disease affected regular activities). WPAI generated four component scores: percentage of work time missed (absenteeism); percentage of impairment while working (presentisms); percentage of overall work impairment (absenteeism and presentisms combined); and percentage of activity impairment. Unemployed participants only answered to questions related to employment status and regular activities impairment. Scores for WPAI range from 0% to 100%, where 0 % indicates no impairment and 100% is total loss of work productivity/activity. Mean total activity impairment was reported.

Time frame:
The last 7 days prior to Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of total activity impairment
Mean Percentage of Total Activity Impairment Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants
percentage of total activity impairmentModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Mean Percentage of Total Activity Impairment Assessed by WPAI in UC or CD Participants45.7 ± 35.8733.1 ± 30.7644.0 ± 30.4527.4 ± 29.53
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Quit Their Job Due to IBD and Unable to Return to Work

Percentages are rounded off at the nearest single decimal.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Quit Their Job Due to IBD and Unable to Return to Work
percentage of participantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Who Quit Their Job Due to IBD and Unable to Return to Work004.80
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UC or CD Categorized Based on Healthcare Resources

Healthcare resources included hospitalizations, medical appointments, imaging, and laboratory testing. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UC or CD Categorized Based on Healthcare Resources
percentage of participantsModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Hospital Admissions37.217.328.612.7
Medical Appointments: IBD Specialist67.459.664.366.7
Medical Appointments: Emergency Medical Appointment2.3000
Medical Appointments: Other Specialist4.702.44.2
Imaging and Laboratory Testing60.561.552.467.2
SecondaryTotal Direct Medical Cost for Participants With UC or CD

A cost analysis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD) was developed, classified by severity as mild and moderate-severe for each of the conditions. Direct medical costs were considered and included the following items: associated comorbidities, intestinal manifestations, surgical procedures, emergency visits, hospitalizations, medical appointments, follow-up studies, and previous pharmacological treatments; this was collected in the study including the number of participants and the proportion of them that presented the items studied. The total direct medical cost for all participants with each of the conditions was obtained, with the average 3-year cost per participant for UC and for CD multiplied by the number of all participants with UC and CD respectively. So, the values reported in the data table below represent the total direct cost for all participants with UC and CD respectively. The total direct cost was in Mexican Peso(MXN).

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · MXN
Total Direct Medical Cost for Participants With UC or CD
MXNModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Total Direct Medical Cost for Participants With UC or CD16362506.1312611636.509673667.7533842289.53
SecondaryIndirect Cost for Participants With UC or CD

A cost analysis of UC and CD was developed, classified by severity as mild and moderate-severe for each condition. Indirect cost was estimated by using number of hours missed from work (absenteeism) multiplied by average hourly labor cost including wages and benefits, to calculate average lost productivity cost per participant due to absenteeism during specified duration. Hours missed from work were assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI-GH) questionnaire, in which respondents answered 6 questions related to work productivity and impairment.The indirect medical cost for all participants with each of the conditions was obtained,with the average 3-year cost per participant for UC and for CD multiplied by the number of all employed participants with UC and CD respectively. So, values reported in data table below represent the indirect cost in totality for all employed participants with UC and CD respectively. The indirect cost is in MXN.

Time frame:
From 3 years prior to Day 1 until Day 1
Reported as:
Number · MXN
Indirect Cost for Participants With UC or CD
MXNModerate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative Colitis
Indirect Cost for Participants With UC or CD394402.91276419.1377869.29458451.24

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Mild to None Crohn's Disease0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)
Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)
Mild to None Ulcerative Colitis0/189 (0%)0/189 (0%)0/189 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Enrolled Population Set included all participants who provided written informed consent and fulfilled the study eligibility criteria.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Moderate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative ColitisTotal
Mean49.5 (20 to 82)42.8 (21 to 81)43.0 (20 to 79)43.4 (18 to 80)44.67 (18 to 82)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Moderate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative ColitisTotal
Female253319114191
Male18192375135
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Moderate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative ColitisTotal
Count of participants————0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Moderate to Severe Crohn's DiseaseMild to None Crohn's DiseaseModerate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisMild to None Ulcerative ColitisTotal
Mexico435242189326
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Unidad de Enfermedades Reumaticas y Cronico degenerativas
    Torreon, Coahuila 27000, Mexico
  • Centro De Investigacion Clinica De Alta Especialidad "Cicae"
    Torreon, Coahuila 27010, Mexico
  • Hospital Medica Sur Tlalpan
    Ciudad de Mexico, Distrito Federal 14050, Mexico
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas Y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
    Ciudad de Mexico, Distrito Federal 14080, Mexico
  • Endoamer S.C.
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44600, Mexico
  • CIMESAP Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada de Capital Variable
    Zapopan, Jalisco 45138, Mexico
  • Fundacion Santos y de la Garza Evia
    Monterrey, Nuevo Leon 64710, Mexico
  • Oncare Oncology
    San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon 66220, Mexico
  • Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud
    San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon 66278, Mexico
  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica de Oaxaca
    Oaxaca de Juarez, Oaxaca 68020, Mexico
  • Torre Medica Sanatorio Toluca
    Toluca, 50120, Mexico
  • Arke SMO S.A. De C.V
    Veracruz, 91910, Mexico
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 22, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 8, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04873700
Lead sponsor
Takeda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 5, 2021
Start date
Aug 30, 2021
Primary completion
May 17, 2022
Completion
May 17, 2022
Results posted
Nov 7, 2024
Last update
Nov 7, 2024

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion