ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04873687Updated Sep 25, 2023

Effectiveness of ECP Therapy in Stable Angina Pectoris Patients

An interventional study of External Counter Pulsation (ECP) therapy in Counterpulsation and Angina Pectoris, sponsored by Universitas Padjadjaran. Recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-25.

Primary conditionAngina, StableRegistry: Angina PectorisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Angina Pectoris — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Angina, Stable
Why
  1. The study's title name Angina, Stable, a narrower term within Angina Pectoris.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Universitas Padjadjaran · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

External Counterpulsation (ECP) is a non-invasive therapy using pressured cuff that is performed on patients with refractory stable angina pectoris to relieve symptoms and increase quality of life. In Indonesia, waiting time for getting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure for revascularization treatment in stable angina pectoris patients is way longer than international recommendation which correlates with increase morbidity and mortality during the waiting time. Utilization of ECP for such patients who wait for CABG procedure is still unclear. The investigator aim to evaluate efficacy of addition of ECP compared with medical therapy alone for this population. The efficacy is evaluated using measurement from echocardiography result, treadmill test result, and clinical outcome. if applicable, examination of myocardial perfusion using nuclear examination will also be performed.

Read the detailed description

Waiting time for elective CABG procedure in Indonesia is usually longer than six weeks, way longer than the European society of cardiology recommendation. During the waiting time, patients still complain of having troubling chest pain and at risk from 1.7% mortality even after optimal medical therapy. ECP is a non-invasive therapy using a pressured cuff performed on patients that have been utilized in refractory angina pectoris patients to relieve symptoms, increase the quality of life, and decrease future major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

This study is proof of principal clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of addition ECP therapy after optimal medical therapy for stable angina pectoris patients waiting for CABG in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia. Eligible patients will be informed about the study and randomized to the intervention arm. Patients in the experimental arm will undergo ECP therapy consisting of 36 sessions, each session @1 hour/day, five days a week with an initial pressure of 300mmHg. No intervention will be given to patients in the control arm.

The primary and secondary endpoint is the change in variables measured before and after the intervention is fully implemented. The primary endpoint variables are global longitudinal strain (GLS), Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Time to ST-Segment depression, duration of treadmill test, the Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) score, and the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) score. The secondary endpoint variable will be myocardial perfusion score measured as Summed Rest Score, Summed Stress Score, Summed Difference Score, Myocardial Micro-alternation Index (MMI), the level of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), microRNA-92a (miR-92a), NT pro BNP, Troponin, incidence of MACE, general quality of life based on questionnaire The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L, and effectiveness of ECP for stable angina pectoris patients with pharmaco-economy studies. This change will then be compared between the intervention experimental arm and control arm.

Safety oversight by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be conducted by independent parties. Internal Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will be established to oversee the study, focused on data quality. Quality control (QC) procedures will be implemented beginning with the data entry system. Data QC checks that will be run on the database will be automatically generated weekly, and any quality issues identified will be reviewed by the DMC a plan put in place for resolution.

02

Conditions studied

  • Counterpulsation
  • Angina Pectoris

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • External Counterpulsation
  • Stable Angina Pectoris
  • Indicated CABG
  • Global longitudinal strain
  • Ischemic response
03

In context

Angina, Stable Reclassified

343 studies on the registry are indexed under Angina, Stable; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is below the median of 150 across 230 interventional studies indexed under Angina, Stable.

Browse Angina, Stable studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitas Padjadjaran is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Compared within Angina, Stable, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Angina Pectoris. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 18 years old
  • Diagnosed with stable angina pectoris
  • Anatomic vessel disease (VD) lesion with 2VD/3VD
  • Indicated for CABG and in waiting list of CABG procedure; or refuse for CABG and choose medical therapy only; or patients who are decided by the responsible doctor for medical treatment alone because of the high risks of CABG surgery.
  • Not planned to urgent CABG
  • Minimum optimal medical therapy within 2 weeks
  • Able and willing to sign and comply with study procedures
  • The patient lives in Bandung City and its neighborhood
  • Retired patient; or not actively working during working hours; or willing to take the time to participate in research.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Chronic heart failure with Functional Class III - IV
  • \<35%
  • Unprotected left main stenosis >50%
  • Blood pressure >180/110mmHg
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Acute Heart Failure
  • Severe aorta regurgitation
  • Malignant arrhythmia
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Premature ventricular complex
  • Peripheral occlusive artery disease
  • Phlebitis
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Hemorrhagic diathesis
  • Severe chronic kidney disease
  • Aortic aneurysm
  • Abdominal aneurysm
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Low back pain
  • Pregnancy
  • Registered as other clinical study participant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    The intervention arm will comprise study participants who receive intervention therapy (i.e eligible stable angina pectoris patients in intervention arm who agree to participate)

    Device: External Counter Pulsation (ECP) therapy

  • No intervention
    Control

    Eligible stable angina pectoris patients in the control arm will receive no intervention therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceExternal Counter Pulsation (ECP) therapy

    ECP therapy consist of 36 session, each session @1 hour/day, five days a week with initial pressure of 300mmHg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)

    GLS is a parameter captured through transthoracic echocardiography. GLS was calculated as the mean peak longitudinal systolic strain of all the LV segments, consistent with American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  2. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

    LVEF is a parameter captured through transthoracic echocardiography. LVEF was calculated by Simpson biplane method

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  3. Change in Time to mm ST-segment Depression

    Time to induce significant ST-segment Depression using treadmill exercise test

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  4. Change in Duration of Treadmill Test

    Maximally tolerated time of treadmill exercise test using Bruce protocol or Modified Bruce protocol

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  5. Change in CCS score

    Degree of presenting chest pain symptoms using the Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class score. CCS class score ranging from 1 (mild) to 4 (severe)

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  6. Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Score

    Quality of life based on The Seattle Angina Questionnaire measurement. The possible range of scores for each of the five subscales is 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A change of 10 points in any of the subscales is considered to be clinically important.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Summed Rest Score (SRS)

    Summed Rest Score is part of myocardial perfusion parameters of SPECT myocardial perfusion defects examination. The score are accumulated from 17 polar map segment. each segment scored. the extent and severity of perfusion deficits while rest ranging from 0 to 4 with higher score mean worse clinical apperance.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  2. Change in Summed Stress Score (SSS)

    Summed Stress Score is part of myocardial perfusion parameters of SPECT myocardial perfusion defects examination. The score are accumulated from 17 polar map segment. each segment scored. the extent and severity of perfusion deficits while stress ranging from 0 to 4 with higher score mean worse clinical apperance.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  3. Change in Summed Difference Score (SDS)

    Summed Difference Score is part of myocardial perfusion parameters of SPECT myocardial perfusion defects examination. SDS can be calculated by subtracting the SRS from the SSS (SDS = SSS - SRS). This measure is used to describe the degree to which the deficit/ischemia is reversible. An SDS score of 0-1 indicates no ischemia; 2-4 points indicate mild ischemia; 5-6 points indicate moderate ischemia; while 7 or more points indicate severe ischemia.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  4. Myocardial Micro-alternation Index (MMI)

    Myocardial Micro-alternation Index is part of ECG dispersion mapping (ECG-DM)

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  5. The level of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

    Blood tests were carried out to determine levels of VEGF using ELISA and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The measurement unit is pg/ml.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  6. The level of microRNA-92a (miR-92a)

    Blood tests were carried out to determine levels of miR-92a using ELISA and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  7. The level of NT pro BNP and Troponin

    Blood tests were carried out to determine levels of NT pro BNP (measurement unit pg/ml).

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  8. The level of Troponin

    Blood tests were carried out to determine levels of Troponin (measurement unit ng/ml).

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  9. Change in Quality of Life

    Quality of life based on Questionnaire The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L, is a questionnaire used to assess the quality of life of angina pectoris patients undergoing ECP treatment, allowing us to determine how much money can be saved in extending a patient's life for one year. It consists of five assessment domains, which are walking ability, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The normal range is 0-1, with a score of 1 indicating the best quality of life.

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

  10. Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

    Number of incidence of Major adverse cardiac event

    Time frame: 2 years

  11. Effectiveness of ECP for stable angina pectoris patients

    Effectiveness of ECP for stable angina pectoris patients is based on pharmacoeconomics. The assessment will use the ICER formula, comparing optimal medication therapy from both healthcare and national insurance perspectives, taking into account about nominal outcomes, clinical outcomes, and patient quality of life outcomes. The results from the formula will then be input into a diagram to determine whether they fall into quadrant 1, 2, 3, or 4 (the best outcome is if it falls into quadrant 2).

    Time frame: At baseline and week 7 (post intervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital
    Bandung, West Java 40161, Indonesia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arora RR, Chou TM, Jain D, Fleishman B, Crawford L, McKiernan T, Nesto RW. The multicenter study of enhanced external counterpulsation (MUST-EECP): effect of EECP on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and anginal episodes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):1833-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00140-0. PubMed 10362181 ↗
  • Wu E, Desta L, Brostrom A, Martensson J. Effectiveness of Enhanced External Counterpulsation Treatment on Symptom Burden, Medication Profile, Physical Capacity, Cardiac Anxiety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):375-385. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000638. PubMed 31929322 ↗
  • Subramanian R, Nayar S, Meyyappan C, Ganesh N, Chandrakasu A, Nayar PG. Effect of Enhanced External Counter Pulsation Treatment on Aortic Blood Pressure, Arterial Stiffness and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):OC30-OC34. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23122.8743. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PubMed 27891374 ↗
  • Zhang C, Liu X, Wang X, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Ge Z. Efficacy of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Refractory Angina on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Class: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(47):e2002. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002002. PubMed 26632696 ↗
  • Head SJ, da Costa BR, Beumer B, Stefanini GG, Alfonso F, Clemmensen PM, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A, Windecker S, Juni P, Sousa-Uva M. Adverse events while awaiting myocardial revascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):206-217. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx115. PubMed 28472484 ↗
  • Rampengan SH, Prihartono J, Siagian M, Immanuel S. The Effect of Enhanced External Counterpulsation Therapy and Improvement of Functional Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Acta Med Indones. 2015 Oct;47(4):275-82. PubMed 26932695 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04873687
Lead sponsor
Universitas Padjadjaran
Responsible party
Badai Bhatara Tiksnadi (Head of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Clinic Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2023

Study contacts

Mohammad R Akbar, MD, FIHA.
Contact
m.r.akbar@unpad.ac.id
+6281221040265
Badai B Tiksnadi, MD, FIHA.
Contact
badai.bhatara.tiksnadi@unpad.ac.id
+628112237277
Mohammad R Akbar, MD, FIHA.
principal investigator · Universitas Padjadjaran

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion