CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04873401Updated Jul 22, 2026Results posted

Leveraging Social Networks to Increase COVID-19 Testing Uptake

An interventional study of Chain-referral and Credible Messenger in Covid-19, Substance Use and Opioid Use, sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by New York State Psychiatric Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
498
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This two-year project will adapt and conduct a trial examining the ability of two recruitment strategies, chain-referral and credible messenger, to reach those who use opioids and other substances in order to increase their uptake of onsite point of care COVID-19 testing that will be delivered in two community based organizations (CBOs): Alliance for Positive Change and Argus Health Inc. In Phase 1, Adapt two implementation strategies to support COVID-19 testing uptake and sustainability, adapting elements of existing efficacious social network-based interventions via a CBPR approach. In Phase 2, we will examine and compare the efficacy of two sets of implementation strategies on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake, (iii) service delivery (i.e. quarantine, medical care, contact tracing) and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs. In Phase 3, Elucidate and compare the system/organizational-, staff-, and individual-level factors that influence implementation (i.e. fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, sustainability) of the strategies to develop a plan for dissemination and scale-up in other CBOs who serve opioid and other substance using individuals in NYC.

Read the detailed description

Aims. Building on the expertise and community out-reach infrastructure of two community-based organizations (CBOs), Argus Community Inc. and Alliance for Positive Change, and following a CBPR approach, investigators propose to take two implementation strategies that have been proven to increase the reach, access, and uptake of HIV testing and related services, and adapt them to support the uptake and sustainability of point-of-service (POS) onsite COVID-19 testing in CBOs that target the underserved population of those who use opioids and other substances. Guided by social cognitive theory, Andersen's model of health care access and the EPIS framework, the specific aims are to:

(1). Adapt two implementation strategies to support COVID-19 testing uptake and sustainability, adapting elements of existing efficacious social network-based interventions via a CBPR approach; (2). Examine and compare the efficacy of two sets of implementation strategies on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake, (iii) service delivery and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs. Use of data drawn from Healthix, a public health information exchange, will supplement this comparison by generating a baseline of participant prior testing and health behavior to determine access to underserved populations as well as long-term influence on future testing behavior; and (3) Elucidate and compare the system/organizational-, staff-, and individual-level factors that influence implementation of the strategies to develop a plan for dissemination and scale-up in other CBOs who serve opioid and other substance using individuals in NYC.

Settings. Alliance for Positive Change and Argus Health Inc have well-established partnership with members of the parent grant team following partnerships on numerous initiatives targeting HIV, HCV and STIs prevention, testing and treatment for over 20 years. Argus and Alliance have had a combined presence in the communities of Washington Heights, Harlem and the South Bronx for over 50 years, and have subsequently developed considerable trust, support and "credibility" within these communities.

Design, Sample Size and Randomization. Two distinct social network recruitment strategies will be adapted and compared. Guided by the EPIS framework, SCT, and Andersen's Model, this 2-year study will comprise three phases. In Phase 1: Adaptation of outreach recruitment strategies, investigators will work with our project CAB, via a CBPR approach, to adapt chain-referral and POL strategies for uptake of COVID-19 testing, to finalize recruitment and on-site testing protocols. In Phase 2: Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation, investigators will compare the two strategies in a cross-over design at two CBOs, with initial strategy assignment randomly determined and rolled out for 4 months before cross-over. Investigators will examine the impact of each strategy on (i) reach, (ii) COVID-19 testing/repeat testing, and (iii) service delivery among those who test positive for COVID-19. In Phase 3: Sustainment, CBOs will implement the strategy with more favorable outcomes in Phase 2, and investigators will examine their sustainment of the program. Implementation evaluation will identify participant-, staff-, and organizational-level factors that influence the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of each strategy in the CBOs.

Phase 1: Adaptation of Outreach Strategies. Investigators will employ a CBPR-guided approach to adapt the social network-based outreach strategies. To do this, investigators will hold four 1-hour working groups with our CAB. All CAB members will be reimbursed for their time. These groups will address how to best employ the different strategies to reach our target population and motivate testing uptake. Protocols will be shaped by findings from working group meetings and shared back to the CAB who will provide feedback to inform changes in content and format, and help identify markers of success and potential challenges.

Phase 2: Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation Overview. During the first 4 months of Phase II each site will roll out a different recruitment strategy (randomly assigned 1:1) to the site Following four months of implementation, the sites will conduct a rapid PDSA through a series of four, weekly workgroups. Revisions to protocols will be made during these meetings and then the sites will "cross-over" and implement the other recruitment strategy for the next four months. Participants may be recruited twice, once in each strategy; any instances of repeat testing will be documented.

Participants. In Phase 2, using two different strategies, investigators aim to enroll N=500 individuals with a history of opioid and/or substance abuse within the past 6 months. Based on the geographic catchment areas of Argus and Alliance and current demographics of their current substance using clientele, investigators anticipate participants will be 64% male, 51% African American, 39% Hispanic. Inclusion/exclusion criteria. All participants, regardless of recruitment strategy, must endorse opioid or other substance abuse in the past 6 months, and must speak English or Spanish; >18years.

Study enrollment, and consent. Once an individual is screened at the agency and determined to be eligible, Research Assistants (RAs) will obtain written informed consent for study participation and consent to access their clinical information in Healthix, a large health information exchange in NYC. Following consent, the RA will administer the baseline assessment in a private office. Participants will receive remuneration in accordance with standards in this population. These procedures will occur in the same way regardless of recruitment method into the study.

Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation. Chain-referral Strategy. Recruitment of seed participants. N=16 participants who meet inclusion criteria will be recruited from among clients at Argus and Alliance (n=8 at each site) to serve as seeds. Seeds will be stratified by substance use treatment status and gender. Site staff will contact selected individuals and refer those interested to the research team who will screen for eligibility. Following the completion of the screen, the participant will be offered COVID-19 testing; they will be compensated $20 for completing the interview at the end of the visit. Participants will be given the option to help recruit others to receive a COVID-19 test for a small incentive. If participants agree, they will receive a brief training on recruitment and three coupons. The participants will be instructed to give these coupons only to people they know who use substances.

Chain-referral recruitment: Individuals redeeming coupons will be screened for study participation, assessed and offered COVID-19 testing. Those eligible and interested will be enrolled. Procedures for informed consent, study enrollment and peer education training will be identical to those for seeds. Participants will return after three weeks to receive a recruitment incentive of $10 for every coupon redeemed. During this second visit they will complete a brief questionnaire to quantify peer-recruitment attempts.

Sample size: All participants will receive a maximum of four coupons to prevent the development of "professional recruiters." The process will continue until the sample size exceeds 125 persons (at each site) or the recruitment period is over. Based on prior work with similar populations in NYC investigators anticipate being able to recruit 125 participants for a COVID-19 test in 16 weeks.

POL Strategy: Alliance and Argus have existing POL/peer outreach programs with well-established histories of community involvement. Investigators will leverage this existing infrastructure and adapt to focus on COVID-19 testing. Based on protocols developed in Phase 1, POLs will be trained to (i) initiate conversations related to stopping transmission of COVID-19; (ii) deliver effective messages endorsing benefits of COVID-19 testing, social distancing and mask wearing; (iii) identify and visit those venues known to them where those with substance use will likely congregate; (iv) set goals to engage in conversations about COVID-19 testing with the target population and (v) document/track efforts.

Recruitment of participants via credible messengers: Based on these organizations' previous POL recruitment, 4 POLs are able to recruit 10 participants per week for HIV testing and related services. This will permit recruitment of 3-4 participants/week per POL (12-16 total/week), allowing completion of enrollment for outreach strategy in 4 total months. Participants recruited via POL will be consented and interviewed in the same manner as described above. Following the interview, participants will then be offered COVID-19 testing; they will be compensated $20 for completing the interview.

Quality Improvement (QI)/PDSA: Following the completion of the first 4-month recruitment period, agency staff, CAB members and POLs will participate in quality improvement. Using an abbreviated PDSA protocol, stakeholders across both agencies will participate to facilitate information sharing, cross-learning, and capacity building. They will refine messaging, procedures, and educational content, and make a plan to implement change during the next recruitment period. The fourth workgroup will address issues associated with internal site logistics.

Assessment and analysis. Investigators will examine the impact of the intervention on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake and (iii) service delivery; and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs as well as potential mediating/moderating variables from the Andersen, SCT and EPIS models. Data drawn from Healthix on prior and future COVID-19 testing will augment study data to determine access to underserved populations and influence on future testing behavior.

Analysis overview and main outcomes. The primary outcome of interest comparing the strategies will be testing occurrence as an indicator of testing uptake. An important secondary outcome will be reach measured through the number of coupons redeemed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Covid-19
  • Substance Use
  • Opioid Use
03

In context

COVID-19

7,641 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 487 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 498 is above the median of 100 across 4,100 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

New York State Psychiatric Institute is the lead sponsor of 425 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Of its 50 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Endorse opioid use in the past 6 months
  • Speak English or Spanish
  • Age 18+

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deny history of opioid use (but will be offered COVID-19 testing)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
498 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chain Referral

    In the chain-referral intervention, a discrete number of "seeds" will be recruited from the community partners, trained and incentivized to recruit and refer members of their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing; these recruits are then trained to do the same.

    Behavioral: Chain-referral

  • Experimental
    Credible Messenger

    In the credible messenger intervention, peers identified as popular and socially influential individuals within their respective communities with lived experience are trained to engage within formal and informal social networks to promote behavior change.

    Behavioral: Credible Messenger

Interventions

  • BehavioralChain-referral

    In the chain-referral intervention, a discrete number of "seeds" will be recruited from the community partners, trained and incentivized to recruit and refer members of their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing. The peer recruiters are paid for each suvcessful and eligible recruit who enrolls to be tested. Those individuals are then themselves trained to recruit peers from their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing. This is repeated over a period of 4-6 months.

  • BehavioralCredible Messenger

    In the credible messenger intervention, peers noted to be popular and socially influential individuals with lived experience will be trained to engage within community settings and areas to encourage community members to receive COVID-19 testing at the community partnering agencies. Peers will recruit community members over a period of 4-6 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participants Who Agreed to Take a COVID-19 Rapid Test of Those Enrolled

    Number of participants who agreed to take a COVID-19 rapid test out of those who were enrolled (n=498)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Mean Number of COVID-19 Rapid Tests Taken

    Mean number of COVID-19 rapid tests taken among those who took at least 1 test (n=478)

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Uptake of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community

    Total number of coupons redeemed (Chain referral arm) out of coupons delivered OR total number of people approached in the community via credible messengers (Credible messenger arm) who enrolled in the study

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Reach of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community

    Number of people reached or approached via coupon (CR) based on number of coupons distributed or via peer/direct contact (CM), who may or may not have enrolled in the study

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Apr 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChain ReferralCredible Messenger
Started271227
Completed263223
Not completed84

Outcome measures

PrimaryParticipants Who Agreed to Take a COVID-19 Rapid Test of Those Enrolled

Number of participants who agreed to take a COVID-19 rapid test out of those who were enrolled (n=498)

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · participants who tested
Participants Who Agreed to Take a COVID-19 Rapid Test of Those Enrolled
participants who testedChain ReferralCredible Messenger
Participants Who Agreed to Take a COVID-19 Rapid Test of Those Enrolled261214
Statistical analysis
  • Chain Referral vs Credible Messenger · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.928 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.39 to 2.79
PrimaryMean Number of COVID-19 Rapid Tests Taken

Mean number of COVID-19 rapid tests taken among those who took at least 1 test (n=478)

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mean number of tests taken
Mean Number of COVID-19 Rapid Tests Taken
mean number of tests takenChain ReferralCredible Messenger
Mean Number of COVID-19 Rapid Tests Taken1.8 ± 1.751.6 ± 1.35
Statistical analysis
  • Chain Referral vs Credible Messenger · Regression, Linear · p = 0.240 · Median difference (final values): -0.173 · 95% CI -0.24 to 0.115
PrimaryUptake of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community

Total number of coupons redeemed (Chain referral arm) out of coupons delivered OR total number of people approached in the community via credible messengers (Credible messenger arm) who enrolled in the study

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Uptake of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community
ParticipantsChain ReferralCredible Messenger
Uptake of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community271227
Statistical analysis
  • Chain Referral vs Credible Messenger · Regression, Linear · p = 0.367 · Slope: 0.1171 · 95% CI 0.05 to 0.29
PrimaryReach of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community

Number of people reached or approached via coupon (CR) based on number of coupons distributed or via peer/direct contact (CM), who may or may not have enrolled in the study

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · people approached
Reach of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community
people approachedChain ReferralCredible Messenger
Reach of the Recruitment Strategy Into the Community624468
Statistical analysis
  • Chain Referral vs Credible Messenger · Regression, Linear · p = 0.005 · Slope: 0.171 · 95% CI 0.05 to 0.29

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline assessment period, up to 2 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Chain Referral0/263 (0%)0/263 (0%)32/263 (12.2%)
Credible Messenger0/223 (0%)0/223 (0%)25/223 (11.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventChain ReferralCredible Messenger
suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders32/26325/223

Baseline characteristics

The number of participants who were eligible and enrolled in the study

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Chain ReferralCredible MessengerTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years254217471
>=65 years9615
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Chain ReferralCredible MessengerTotal
Mean48.6 ± 9.546.8 ± 10.147.3 ± 9.8
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Chain ReferralCredible MessengerTotal
Gender — Male191166357
Gender — Female6651117
Gender — Non-binary/other4610
Gender — Prefer not to answer202
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Chain ReferralCredible MessengerTotal
Hispanic/Latinx196142338
White (non-Hispanic)253358
Black (non-Hispanic)343872
Other (non-Hispanic)7512
Unkown156
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Chain ReferralCredible MessengerTotal
United States263223486
08

Study locations

1 site
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 17, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Apr 4, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04873401
Lead sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Collaborators
Alliance for Postive Change, Argus Community Inc., Columbia University, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Katherine Elkington (Research Scientist, New York State Psychiatric Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2021
Start date
Apr 20, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 18, 2022
Completion
Jan 1, 2023
Results posted
Apr 18, 2023
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Katherine Elkington, PhD
principal investigator · New York State Psychiatric Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion