ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04871568CITESUpdated Apr 29, 2026

Central Vein Stenosis Due to Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Subclavian Compared to Jugular Vein

An interventional study of Temporary central dialysis catheterization in Subclavian Vein Stenosis and Jugular Vein Occlusion, sponsored by Skane University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by Skane University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2021; still recruiting 4 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a well-known complication of central venous catheterization, especially after insertion of temporary hemodialysis catheters (tHDC). Incidence and prevalence differ between studies, and exact figures are hard to tell since proper venographies seldom are performed unless the patient is symptomatic.

Most tHDC are placed in the jugular or femoral veins as catheters in the subclavian veins have been shown to result in CVS to a greater degree. However, some studies are equivocal and there are several advantages with the subclavian vein such as a lower risk for infectious and thrombotic complications, longer durability (thereby avoiding placement of a new catheter with repeated tissue trauma), increased comfort during insertion and use, less effect on blood flow if the patient moves the head, easier to mobilize.

The studies on CVS incidence originate from the 1990s when ultrasound-guided insertions were unheard of and polyurethane catheters were prevalent. The investigators believe that there is less tissue trauma when using ultrasound guidance in real-time. Furthermore, CVS is less common when silicone catheters are used instead of polyurethane catheters.

To avoid unnecessary vascular trauma and patient suffering, any pre-existing CVS should ideally be detected before cannulation attempts. A CT scan of the chest with IV contrast is preferred, but this exposes the patient to ionized radiation, is time-consuming and (although debated) may cause contrast-induced nephropathy. A brief ultrasound examination to verify central venous patency would be useful provided it is shown to have an adequate sensitivity for stenosis detection.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicentric, prospective, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Patients will be enrolled in three hospitals (Lund, Malmö, Helsingborg) in southern Sweden. The trial is investigator-initiated and non-commercial. The radiologist interpreting CT venographies will be blinded to study group allocation, whereas the patient, the treating physicians and other care providers will not be blinded.

Patients will be randomized to receive a silicone tCDC either in the right subclavian vein (intervention) or in the right internal jugular vein (control). All catheterizations will be performed in a standardized manner. A questionnaire regarding the patient's experience of the catheterization procedure is handed out as soon as possible, preferably immediately after catheterization if the clinical situation permits.

Follow-up is carried out 3-6 months after the removal of the catheter to eliminate transitory thrombosis. A CT venography with a customized protocol for this study will be performed to look for CVS. An ultrasound examination of the central veins is performed and compared to the findings of the CT venography.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subclavian Vein Stenosis
  • Jugular Vein Occlusion

Keywords

  • Central Venous Stenosis
03

In context

Constriction, Pathologic

456 studies on the registry are indexed under Constriction, Pathologic; 109 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 295 interventional studies indexed under Constriction, Pathologic.

Browse Constriction, Pathologic studies →

Lead sponsor

Skane University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (18 years of age or older).
  • In need of a tCDC with an expected treatment time of at least 7 days.
  • .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intravenous pacemaker or a PICC-line via right-sided central veins in situ.
  • Known right-sided CVS.
  • AV fistula on the right upper extremity.
  • History of central venous vascular interventions including stents, dilatations and more (but not previous central venous catheterization).
  • Central venous catheter in the right internal jugular vein or in the right subclavian vein in situ.
  • Either the right jugular vein or the right subclavian vein unavailable for catheterization due to, e.g., local skin infection, thrombosis or inability to visualize the vein with ultrasound.
  • Known allergy to iodinated contrast agents.
  • >35 kg/m2.
  • No study physician available for the catheterization.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Right subclavian vein catheterization

    The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right subclavian vein.

    Procedure: Temporary central dialysis catheterization

  • Active comparator
    Right internal jugular vein catheterization

    The temporary central dialysis catheter is placed in the right internal jugular vein.

    Procedure: Temporary central dialysis catheterization

Interventions

  • ProcedureTemporary central dialysis catheterization

    Placement of temporary central dialysis catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Central vein stenosis

    \>50 percent central vein diameter reduction (stenosis) using CT venography

    Time frame: 1.5-3 months after the catheterization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (50 percent threshold)

    Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 50 percent venous diameter reduction)

    Time frame: 1.5-3 months after the catheterization

  2. Ultrasound-guided assessment of central vein stenosis (80 percent threshold)

    Ultrasound-derived parameters indicating central vein stenosis are compared to CT venography results (with a threshold of 80 percent venous diameter reduction)

    Time frame: 1.5-3 months after the catheterization

  3. Patient experience

    Questionnaire regarding the patient's experience of discomfort during the catheterization procedure and when carrying the catheter

    Time frame: Immediately after catheterization and 3-6 months after the catheterization

  4. Dialysis problems

    Blood flow rates and interruptions during dialysis are compared between the groups

    Time frame: During dialysis sessions

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Borgquist O, Naddi L, Bozovic G, Hellberg M, Annborn M, Sjovall F, Adrian M, Hettinger E, Sjoberg P, Kander T. Central venous stenosis after subclavian versus internal jugular dialysis catheter insertion (CITES) in adults in need of a temporary central dialysis catheter: study protocol for a two-arm, parallel-group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023 May 12;24(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07350-9. PubMed 37173715 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04871568
Lead sponsor
Skane University Hospital
Responsible party
Ola Borgquist (Principal Investigator, Skane University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2021
Start date
Nov 15, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Ola Borgquist, MD, PhD
Contact
oborgquist@gmail.com
+46704156334
Thomas Kander, MD, PhD
Contact
thomas.kander@med.lu.se
Ola Borgquist, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Skånes universitetssjukhus
Thomas Kander, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Skånes universitetssjukhus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion