ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04867993AmicoolUpdated Apr 30, 2021

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics to Optimize Dosing Recommendations in Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia Treated With Hypothermia

An interventional study of Amikacin in Asphyxia Neonatorum, sponsored by University of Sarajevo. Status unknown at 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Open to participants aged Up to 1 Day. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-30.

Sponsored by University of Sarajevo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Feb 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
Up to 1 Day
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As a part of a project on perinatal clinical pharmacology, the primary aim of the present project is to study amikacin pharmacokinetics (PK) and physiology in asphyxiated neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia and to provide amikacin dosing recommendations, which will be validated prospectively. For this purpose, we aim to first collect retrospective data on amikacin available in neonates treated with hypothermia in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)s in Leuven and Amsterdam, and consequently to propose the dosing regimen to be used in the prospective amikacin PK study at our NICU in University Clinical Center (UCC) Sarajevo. At our NICU we aim to collect amikacin PK observations and other covariates in at least 40 neonates while treated with hypothermia and after re-warming period (a paired analysis), and in asphyxiated neonates not treated with hypothermia (control group).

We hereby will use a stepwise approach, as initially used to develop and to validate an amikacin dosing regimen in preterm and term neonates (De Cock RFW et al., 2012, Smits A et al, 2015).

A 3-step approach will be used, of which different parts will be conducted in different contributing hospitals:

  1. Retrospective evaluation of amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in asphyxiated neonates treated with hypothermia (University hospital Leuven, VUmc Amsterdam)
  2. Development of population PK model derived amikacin dosing recommendation
  3. Prospective PK study with validation of the new dosing regimen (UCC Sarajevo, UCC Tuzla)
Read the detailed description

Step 1: Retrospective evaluation of amikacin TDM in asphyxiated neonates treated with hypothermia (University hospital Leuven, VUmc Amsterdam)

1.1 Study patients All neonates admitted to the NICUs of the VUmc Amsterdam and University hospital Leuven who underwent treatment with hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia and who received amikacin during routine care were considered for inclusion in this retrospective analysis if TDM observations were available. Patients hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2015 were eligible for inclusion. Neonates already included in the Pharmacool trial (de Haan et al BMC Pediatrics 2012), were excluded.

Clinical characteristics at birth [gestational age (GA, weeks), birth bodyweight (grams), Apgar score at 1, 5 and 10 minutes after birth, as well as characteristics at the moment of amikacin TDM [postmenstrual age (PMA, weeks), postnatal age (PNA, days), current bodyweight (grams), concurrent ibuprofen (yes/no) or inotropic drugs (yes/no), respiratory support (i.e. continuous positive airway pressure or mechanical ventilation, yes/no), mechanical ventilation (conventional or high-frequency, yes/no) were retrospectively extracted from the patient files. Additionally, blood culture results at the start of amikacin therapy were collected from the individual laboratory reports. The daily nursing progress reports were used to collect amikacin prescription (dose and interval) data.

1.2 Amikacin dosing regimen

  • University hospital Leuven: Up to July 2011, amikacin dosing was based on Langendries JP et al, 1998. Since July 2011, the simplified model-based dosing regimen published by De Cock RFM et al, 2012) was used. Since July 2014, an adapted dosing regimen based on prospective validation is applied (Smits A et al, 2015). In both regimens, the dosing interval was prolonged with 10 hours when ibuprofen was co-administered or when asphyxia was diagnosed/considered by the treating physician.
  • Vumc Amsterdam: Up to 24 March 2015 amikacin dosing was 12 mg/kg/dose. Interval (24 hours or 36 hours) was determined based on TDM value and subsequent clearance calculation (see below). From 24 March 2015 amikacin dosing was 15 mg/kg/dose.

1.3 Drug administration and TDM sampling

  • University hospital Leuven: amikacine (Bristol-Myers Squibb) is administered intravenously over 20 minutes. As part of routine clinical care, blood samples for amikacin TDM are collected just before (trough) administration of the second dose. In a case of unexpected results or after dosing adaptation, additional TDM samples are collected, based on the decision of the treating physician.
  • Vumc: Amikacine (Bristol-Meyers Squib, and recently amikacine Hospira) is administered intravenously over 60 minutes. As part of routine clinical care, the first amikacin TDM sample is taken at least 6 h - but preferably 12-18 h - after the first amikacin administration. This blood sampling is preferably performed during fixed moments at the neonatal department. Based on the amikacin dosing and TDM plasma concentration of the patient, a dosing adaptation is suggested by the pharmacy department, according to the maximum a posteriori Bayesian fitting method, using the MW/Pharm computer program version 3.6 (Mediware, Groningen, the Netherlands). This approach allows variability in TDM sampling time, between and within patients. The predicted target trough level is \< 5 mg/L (http://tdm-monografie.org/monografie/amikacine).

1.4 Amikacin assay

  • University hospital Leuven: Until 31 May 2012, amikacin concentrations were measured with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott TDx kit, Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, IL, USA). The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.8 mg/L. The coefficient of variation (CV) was \< 5% (assessed at 5, 15, and 30mg/L). From 31 May 2012, amikacin quantification was based on a kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS) immunoassay (Roche/Hitachi Cobas c systems, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Also in this essay, the LLOQ was 0.8 mg/L. The CV was \< 4%.
  • Vumc: Until September 2011, amikacin plasma concentrations were measured with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott TDx-FLx, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA). The LLOQ was 0.8 mg/L. The CV was \< 5% (assessed at 5, 15 and 30m g/L). From September 2011, amikacin quantification was based on a particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) (ARCHITECT cSystems, Abbott, Abbott Laboratories Inc, Abbott Park, IL, USA). The limit of quantification for this amikacin assay was 2.0 µg/mL. The coefficient of variation was \< 4%.

1.5 Pharmacokinetic analysis The retrospectively collected amikacin TDM values of University hospital Leuven and VUmc Amsterdam will be added to a previously collected dataset of (near)term neonates receiving amikacin but not underwent hypothermia treatment (Smits A et al, 2015). All data will be implemented in the previously developed amikacin population PK model (De Cock R et al, 2012).

Step 2: Development of population PK model derived amikacin dosing recommendation Since a relevant number of neonates treated with hypothermia will be included, we hereby aim to compare pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, CL, volume of distribution, Vd) of this subgroup of neonates with those of term cases not treated with hypothermia (Smits A et al, 2015). Subsequently, we aim to derive an appropriate model-based dosing regimen to be considered during hypothermia in (near) term cases.

Step 3. Prospective PK study with validation of the new dosing regimen (UCC Sarajevo and UCC Tuzla)

A prospective observational cohort study conducted in NICU with the following aims:

Primary aims:

  • to collect amikacin PK observations, renal elimination characteristics and other covariates in at least 40 asphyxiated neonates while treated with hypothermia and after the re-warming period (a paired analysis) (UCC Sarajevo) and in 40 asphyxiated neonates treated with amikacin but not treated with hypothermia (control group, UCC Tuzla)
  • validation of the new dosing regimen

Secondary aims of this prospective study are:

  • to evaluate amikacin pharmacodynamics (PD) characteristics (minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC90)
  • to document the adverse effects of hypothermia (UCC Sarajevo)

3.1 Study patients Asphyxiated neonates routinely treated with IV amikacin and therapeutic hypothermia (NICU UCC Sarajevo) and asphyxiated neonates treated with IV amikacin but not treated with hypothermia (control group, NICU UCC Tuzla) will be included in the study after parental informed written consent is obtained.

3.2 Amikacin dosing regimen

The amikacin dosing regimen that is routinely used in our unit is based on NeoFax® (2009 version) and depends on PMA as follows:

  • PMA of equal or more than 35 weeks, 15 mg/kg/24 h with an additional dosing interval increase of 6 h for all ages if ibuprofen was co-administered or in the setting of perinatal asphyxia The dosing regimen (current dosing interval +12 h, 15 mg/kg/36h) derived from asphyxiated neonates treated with hypothermia in Leuven and Amsterdam (step 1-2) will be used in the prospective part of this study (step 3).

3.3 Drug administration and blood sampling Amikacin (Likacin®; 500 mg/2mL vial; Lisapharma S.p.A., Erba, Italy) is given to the neonate, as an IV infusion via umbilical vein over 20 min by use of a syringe-pump (Braun; B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA USA). Infusion is followed by slow 0.5 mL Sodium chloride 0.9% flush.

The collection of samples will be obtained to the current clinical and nursing standard procedures at both NICUs. Blood samples for amikacin TDM and corresponding creatinine concentrations will be collected by venous line via umbilical catheter while collecting the sample for other laboratory findings according to the protocol, 6 minutes before ("trough", the Ctrough) the second, third, fourth and fifth dose of amikacin, than 1h after the initiation of administration ("near peak", the maximal concentration, Cmax) of the second, third and fourth dose of amikacin, approximately 40 min after the 20-min IV infusion (Allegaert K, 2004; Langhendries JP, 1998).

Blood samples (\<0.5 mL) will be collected in heparinized tubes. The recommendations for the maximum predefined total amount of blood available for research purposes in a single neonate is 1.0 mL/kg and will be respected.

Blood samples will be centrifuged immediately after collection and subsequently stored at -80°C until analysis. Paired amikacin and creatinine concentrations will be determined.

3.5 Amikacin and creatinine assays Amikacin serum will be determined based on a particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) (ARCHITECT cSystems, Abbott, Abbott Laboratories Inc, Abbott Park, IL, USA).

Plasma/serum creatinin concentration will be quantified either by using the "Jaffa method" in Sarajevo or by using the "corrected Jaffa method" in Tuzla.

MIC90 for amikacin will be determined in each Sarajevo and Tuzla NICU before the dosing.

3.6 Pharmacokinetic analysis A compartmental pharmacokinetics approach will be performed at the Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical faculty, University of Sarajevo, B\&H.

The population pharmacokinetics approach, comparing the data on PK already reported in neonates will be performed at Leiden Academic Centre for drug research, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asphyxia Neonatorum

Keywords

  • Amikacin
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Hypothermia
  • Newborn
03

In context

Asphyxia Neonatorum

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 173 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum.

Browse Asphyxia Neonatorum studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sarajevo is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 1 Day
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for hypothermia group (University Clinical Centre Sarajevo)

  • signed parental informed written consent
  • newborn with GA ≥36 weeks
  • newborn to whom amikacin is administered by intravenous route for clinical indications
  • newborn with perinatal asphyxia treated with hypothermia

Inclusion criteria for control group (University Clinical Centre Tuzla)

  • signed parental informed written consent
  • newborn to whom amikacin is administered by intravenous route for clinical indications
  • newborn with GA ≥36 weeks
  • newborn with perinatal asphyxia defined following Bristol hypothermia protocol from 2015

    • Apgar score of ≤5 at 10 minutes after birth OR
    • Continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at 10 min after birth OR
    • Acidosis defined as either umbilical cord pH or any arterial, venous or capillary pH within 60 min of birth pH\<7.00 OR
    • Base deficit ≥-16 mmol/L in umbilical cord blood sample or any blood sample within 60 minutes of birth (arterial or venous blood)

Non-inclusion criteria for both groups

  • no parental
  • the presence of congenital hepatic or renal pathology
  • no central venous or arterial line in situ for non-invasive blood sampling procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria for both groups

  • parental withdrawal
  • the occurrence of clinical reasons to stop blood sampling
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    asphyxiated neonates treated with amikacin and hypothermia

    Amikacin (Likacin®; 500 mg/2mL vial; Lisapharma S.p.A., Erba, Italy) is given to the neonate, as an IV infusion via umbilical vein over 20 min by use of a syringe-pump (Braun; B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA USA). Infusion is followed by slow 0.5 mL Sodium chloride 0.9% flush.

    Drug: Amikacin

  • Placebo comparator
    asphyxiated neonates treated with amikacin

    Amikacin (Likacin®; 500m g/2mL vial; Lisapharma S.p.A., Erba, Italy) is given to the neonate, as an IV infusion via umbilical vein over 20 min by use of a syringe-pump (Braun; B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA USA). Infusion is followed by slow 0.5 mL Sodium chloride 0.9% flush.

    Drug: Amikacin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Plasma Concentration [Cmax]

    the first plasma concentration measured after the dosing

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Minimum Plasma concentration (Ctrough)

    the last plasma concentration measured after the dosing

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated based on a trapezoidal rule

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Clearance (CL)

    Clearance of the drug, seen from the last part of the concentration-time curve

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Volume of distribution (Vd)

    Volume of distribution of the drug, seen from the early part of the concentration-time curve

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Minumum inhibitory concentration (MIC 90)

    concentration of the drug needed to inhibit the growth of 90% of isolates

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Creatinine clearance

    clearance of the creatinine calculated by different formulas

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. adverse effects of hypothermia

    adverse outcomes of hypothermia

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Pediatric Clinic, University Clinical Centre Sarajevo
    Sarajevo, 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Recruiting
    • Muniba Omerovic · Contactpedijatrija@kcus.ba · +38733566428
    • Sabina Terzic, MD PhD · Principal investigator
    • Aida Kulo Ćesić, MD PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Cock RF, Allegaert K, Schreuder MF, Sherwin CM, de Hoog M, van den Anker JN, Danhof M, Knibbe CA. Maturation of the glomerular filtration rate in neonates, as reflected by amikacin clearance. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Feb 1;51(2):105-17. doi: 10.2165/11595640-000000000-00000. PubMed 22229883 ↗
  • Smits A, De Cock RF, Allegaert K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Danhof M, Knibbe CA. Prospective Evaluation of a Model-Based Dosing Regimen for Amikacin in Preterm and Term Neonates in Clinical Practice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct;59(10):6344-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01157-15. Epub 2015 Jul 27. PubMed 26248375 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2022, 48 months after the start.

Of 33 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Asphyxia Neonatorum, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 48 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 33 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 24, 2021
First posted
Apr 30, 2021
StartActual
Aug 28, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 2022
Last update
Apr 30, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04867993
Lead sponsor
University of Sarajevo
Collaborators
KU Leuven, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Leiden University Medical Center, University Clinical Center Tuzla
Responsible party
Sabina Terzic (MD PhD, Assistant professor, University of Sarajevo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2021
Start date
Aug 28, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2021

Study contacts

Sabina Terzic, MD PhD
Contact
sterzic1974@gmail.com
+38761207051
Aida Kulo Cesic, MD PhD
Contact
aida.kulo@mf.unsa.ba
+38761566169
Karel Allegaert, MD PhD
study chair · Catholic University Leuven, Belgium

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Amikacin

Start the discussion