CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04854616COSTEDUpdated Apr 30, 2026Results posted

Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department

An interventional study of CoSTED Intervention in Smoking Cessation, Electronic Cigarette Use and E-Cig Use, sponsored by Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.

Sponsored by Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
972
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (CoSTED) is an National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) funded randomised controlled trial (RCT). The research question is "in people attending the Emergency Department who smoke, does a brief intervention (including the provision of an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) and referral to stop smoking services) increase smoking cessation in comparison with usual care and is it cost effective?" The trial includes an internal pilot, health economic evaluation and process evaluation. The primary outcome is smoking cessation, self-reported as continuous smoking abstinence, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm. The sample size is 972 (486 in intervention and control) across 6 sites.

Read the detailed description

Research question:

In people attending the Emergency Department who smoke, does a brief intervention (including the provision of an e-cigarette and referral to stop smoking services) increase smoking cessation in comparison with usual care and is it cost effective?

Background:

Tobacco smoking is the leading cause of years of life lost in the United Kingdom (UK), and negatively impacts significantly on physical health conditions and recovery outcomes from injury or surgery. Currently, smoking prevalence is recorded at approximately 15% of the population, but this masks substantial variation between different population groups. Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) development work demonstrates that prevalence of smoking for people attending the emergency department is approximately 24%. Most current smokers will, if asked, state that they want to quit, but need support. The National Health Service (NHS) long term plan and the Tobacco control plan for England recommend smokers are supported to quit at every contact with the health service by 2023/4. To date there have been no RCTs of smoking cessation support in the Emergency Department (ED) setting in the UK, which potentially provides a highly motivating opportunistic route to intervention.

Aims and objectives:

To undertake an RCT, with internal pilot, comparing a brief intervention (including provision of an e-cigarette and referral to local smoking cessation services), assessing long term smoking abstinence, in people attending Emergency Departments.

  1. To run an internal pilot study, with clear stop/go criteria, primarily to test recruitment systems
  2. To definitively test real-world effectiveness of an ED based smoking cessation intervention in comparison with usual care, by comparing smoking abstinence at 6 month follow-up between trial groups
  3. To undertake a cost effectiveness analysis of the intervention in comparison with usual care, from an NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective
  4. To undertake an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation to assess delivery, implementation, fidelity and contamination

Methods:

Randomised Controlled Trial of people who smoke attending an Emergency Department, with an internal pilot, health economic evaluation and process evaluation. The primary outcome is smoking cessation, self-reported as continuous smoking abstinence, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm. The sample size is 972 (with a power of 90% and a difference in quit rates between the groups of 6%).

Anticipated impact and dissemination:

The investigators will definitively test an ED based smoking cessation intervention and make recommendations for future implementation if effective. The intervention has the potential to reduce smoking prevalence by at least 6% based on existing evidence, impacting on improved long term health outcomes for approximately 334,000 members of the UK population if adopted across the NHS. Results will be disseminated at international conferences and published in leading journals to reach academic experts, through NHS networks and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine to reach commissioners, managers and members of the public.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking Cessation
  • Electronic Cigarette Use
  • E-Cig Use
  • Vaping

Keywords

  • intervention
  • emergency department
  • e-cigarette
  • electronic cigarette
  • A&E
  • Accident and Emergency
  • vaping
  • behavioural intervention
  • stop smoking services
03

In context

Smoking Cessation

304 studies on the registry are indexed under Smoking Cessation; 139 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 972 is above the median of 154 across 285 interventional studies indexed under Smoking Cessation.

Browse Smoking Cessation studies →

Lead sponsor

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults ≥18 years old who are current daily tobacco smokers
  2. Current daily tobacco smoker (self-reporting smoking of at least one cigarette per day)
  3. Attending the ED for medical treatment (or accompanying a patient attending for medical treatment)
  4. Submitting an expired carbon monoxide (CO) breath test reading of more than ≥8 parts per million (ppm).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Requiring immediate medical treatment as defined by the treating clinician.
  2. In police custody.
  3. Known history of allergy to nicotine replacement products.
  4. Currently defined as dual users - already using an e-cigarette daily as well as smoking conventional cigarettes.
  5. Without the capacity to give informed consent for participation in the study
  6. Have taken part in the CoSTED trial already
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
972 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CoSTED Intervention

    CoSTED is an opportunistic smoking cessation intervention comprising three elements: 1. brief smoking cessation advice 2. the provision of an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) and training in its use 3. referral to stop-smoking services

    Behavioral: CoSTED Intervention

  • No intervention
    Treatment as Usual

    Signposting to NHS smoking cessation services through provision of written information about local services.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCoSTED Intervention

    Brief smoking cessation advice, the provision of an e-cigarette starter kit and training in its use, and referral to stop smoking services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Continuous Smoking Abstinence

    The primary outcome is smoking cessation, self-reported as continuous smoking abstinence, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm.This is according to the Russell standard, stated as: continuous abstinence (Russell Standard) \[ Time Frame: Six months post quit date \] Self-report of smoking not more than five cigarettes from the Quit date, supported by biochemical validation (expired air carbon monoxide)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

Secondary outcomes

  1. 7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence

    7-day point prevalence abstinence, i.e. current smoking status, Self-report of having smoked no cigarettes (not even a puff) in the past seven days, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  2. Number of Quit Attempts

    Numerical value

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  3. Number of Cigarettes Per Day

    Numerical value

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  4. Nicotine Dependence

    Measured by using the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence. 1-2= low dependence, 3-4 low to moderate dependence, 5-7= moderate dependence, 8-10= high dependence. Minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 10.

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  5. Number of Times Using an E-cigarette Per Day

    Numerical value

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  6. Self-reported Dry Cough or Mouth or Throat Irritation

    This will be measures on symptoms in the last week on a scale of 1-5, 1= not at all (best score) to 5= extremely (worst score)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  7. Motivation to Stop Smoking

    Motivation to Stop Smoking scale 1-7. 1= no motivation to stop smoking (worst score) 7= motivate to stop in the next month (best score)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  8. Adverse Events

    The number of participants reporting serious adverse events.

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

  9. Smoking Status

    This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

    Time frame: 1 month after randomisation

  10. Smoking Status at 3 Months

    This is the only outcome that will be asked at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months from randomisation. This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

    Time frame: 3 months after randomisation

  11. Smoking Status at 6 Months

    This is the only outcome that will be asked at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months from randomisation. This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

    Time frame: 6 months after randomisation

07

Results

Posted Apr 30, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Started484488
Completed479476
Not completed512
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject512

Outcome measures

PrimaryContinuous Smoking Abstinence

The primary outcome is smoking cessation, self-reported as continuous smoking abstinence, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm.This is according to the Russell standard, stated as: continuous abstinence (Russell Standard) \[ Time Frame: Six months post quit date \] Self-report of smoking not more than five cigarettes from the Quit date, supported by biochemical validation (expired air carbon monoxide)

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Continuous Smoking Abstinence
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Continuous Smoking Abstinence3520
Secondary7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence

7-day point prevalence abstinence, i.e. current smoking status, Self-report of having smoked no cigarettes (not even a puff) in the past seven days, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide monitoring with cut off of ≥8ppm

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence11363
SecondaryNumber of Quit Attempts

Numerical value

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Median · Number of quit attempts
Number of Quit Attempts
Number of quit attemptsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Number of Quit Attempts2 (1 to 4)1 (0 to 3)
SecondaryNumber of Cigarettes Per Day

Numerical value

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Median · Number of cigarette smoked a day
Number of Cigarettes Per Day
Number of cigarette smoked a dayCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Number of Cigarettes Per Day0 (0 to 10)10 (0 to 15)
SecondaryNicotine Dependence

Measured by using the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence. 1-2= low dependence, 3-4 low to moderate dependence, 5-7= moderate dependence, 8-10= high dependence. Minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 10.

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Nicotine Dependence
score on scaleCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Nicotine Dependence3.7 ± 2.214.17 ± 2.24
SecondaryNumber of Times Using an E-cigarette Per Day

Numerical value

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Median · Number of E-Cigarettes per day
Number of Times Using an E-cigarette Per Day
Number of E-Cigarettes per dayCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Number of Times Using an E-cigarette Per Day5 (0 to 10)0 (0 to 3)
SecondarySelf-reported Dry Cough or Mouth or Throat Irritation

This will be measures on symptoms in the last week on a scale of 1-5, 1= not at all (best score) to 5= extremely (worst score)

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Self-reported Dry Cough or Mouth or Throat Irritation
scores on a scaleCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Score 1-5 (dry cough)1= not at all (best score) to 5= extremely (worst score)1 (1 to 2)1 (1 to 3)
Score 1-5 (Throat/ Mouth irritation)1= not at all (best score) to 5= extremely (worst score)1 (1 to 2)1 (1 to 2)
SecondaryMotivation to Stop Smoking

Motivation to Stop Smoking scale 1-7. 1= no motivation to stop smoking (worst score) 7= motivate to stop in the next month (best score)

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Motivation to Stop Smoking
scores on a scaleCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Motivation to Stop Smoking4 (3 to 5)4 (2 to 5)
SecondaryAdverse Events

The number of participants reporting serious adverse events.

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Adverse Events2525
SecondarySmoking Status

This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

Time frame:
1 month after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Smoking Status
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Smoking Status9449
SecondarySmoking Status at 3 Months

This is the only outcome that will be asked at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months from randomisation. This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

Time frame:
3 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Smoking Status at 3 Months
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Smoking Status at 3 Months11358
SecondarySmoking Status at 6 Months

This is the only outcome that will be asked at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months from randomisation. This will be a binary question of "have you smoked even a single puff of a cigarette in the past 2 weeks"- point prevalence abstinence

Time frame:
6 months after randomisation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Smoking Status at 6 Months
ParticipantsCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Smoking Status at 6 Months11363

Adverse events

Collected over from enrolment until end of follow-up up to 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CoSTED Intervention0/310 (0%)25/310 (8.1%)23/310 (7.4%)
Treatment as Usual0/292 (0%)25/292 (8.6%)20/292 (6.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Throat/mouth irritation (extreme)Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders25/31025/292
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCoSTED InterventionTreatment as Usual
Dry cough (extreme)Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders13/31012/292
Throat/mouth irritation (extreme)Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/3108/292

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CoSTED InterventionTreatment as UsualTotal
Mean40.52 ± 13.5840.48 ± 13.7240.50 ± 13.65
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CoSTED InterventionTreatment as UsualTotal
Female182187369
Male302301603
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CoSTED InterventionTreatment as UsualTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian283664
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American292857
White419406825
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported81826
Carbon monoxide concentration
Carbon monoxide concentration(Participants)CoSTED InterventionTreatment as UsualTotal
Count of participants484488972
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UY, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Notley C, Clark L, Belderson P, Ward E, Clark AB, Parrott S, Agrawal S, Bloom BM, Boyle AA, Morris G, Gray A, Coats T, Man MS, Bauld L, Holland R, Pope I. Cessation of smoking trial in the emergency department (CoSTED): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e064585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064585. PubMed 36657751 ↗
  • Ward E, Belderson P, Clark A, Stirling S, Clark L, Pope I, Notley C. How do people quit smoking using e-cigarettes? A mixed-methods exploration of participant smoking pathways following receiving an opportunistic e-cigarette-based smoking cessation intervention. Addiction. 2024 Dec;119(12):2185-2196. doi: 10.1111/add.16633. Epub 2024 Sep 10. PubMed 39252616 ↗
  • Pope I, Clark LV, Clark A, Ward E, Belderson P, Stirling S, Parrott S, Li J, Coats T, Bauld L, Holland R, Gentry S, Agrawal S, Bloom BM, Boyle AA, Gray AJ, Morris MG, Livingstone-Banks J, Notley C. Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 2024 Apr 22;41(5):276-282. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213824. PubMed 38531658 ↗
  • Belderson P, Ward E, Pope I, Notley C. Selecting an e-cigarette for use in smoking cessation interventions and healthcare services: findings from patient and public consultation for the COSTED trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 4;14(3):e078677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078677. PubMed 38443079 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 28, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 31, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data underlying the main trial results will be available in a public, open access repository immediately following publication of the major findings of the study. Details of the repository and a persistent URL will be provided on publication of the main results. Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form, and other documents will also be available.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04854616
Lead sponsor
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
University of East Anglia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 22, 2021
Start date
Jan 4, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2023
Completion
Sep 30, 2023
Results posted
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 30, 2026

Study contacts

Ian Pope, MD
principal investigator · Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion