CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04851379Updated Apr 20, 2021

PLACE OF THE 18F-FDG-PET/CT IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP IN PATIENTS WITH CLASSICAL FEVER OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN (FUO)

An observational study in Fever of Unknown Origin, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-20.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
44
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective : To explore the diagnostic contribution of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a population of patients with classical fever of unknown origin (FUO), to precise its place in the diagnostic decision tree in a real-life setting and to identify factors associated with a diagnostic 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Methods: All adult patients (age≥18 years) with a diagnosis of classical FUO who underwent a 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the University Hospital of Montpellier (France) between April 2012 and December 2017 were included. True positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT which evidenced a specific disease causing FUO were considered to be contributive.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fever of Unknown Origin

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fever of Unknown Origin
  • 18F-FDG-PET/CT
03

In context

Fever

601 studies on the registry are indexed under Fever; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 200 across 188 observational studies indexed under Fever.

Browse Fever studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,244 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This retrospective study included all adult patients (age≥18 years) with a diagnosis of classical FUO who underwent a 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the University Hospital of Montpellier (France) between April 2012 and December 2017.

Inclusion criteria

  • age≥18 years
  • a diagnosis of classical FUO who underwent a 18F-FDG-PET/CT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-refusal to participate-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the diagnostic contribution of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT

    the diagnostic contribution of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a population of patients with classical FUO.

    Time frame: day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. 18F-FDG-PET/CT place in the diagnostic decision tree in a real-life setting

    18F-FDG-PET/CT place in the diagnostic decision tree in a real-life setting

    Time frame: day 1

  2. factors associated with a diagnostic 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

    factors associated with a diagnostic 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

    Time frame: day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University hospital of Montpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — nc

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04851379
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
Start date
Dec 8, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2021
Completion
Apr 1, 2021
Last update
Apr 20, 2021

Study contacts

Camille ROUBILLE, MCUPH
study director · UH MONTPELLIER

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion