CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04839978Updated Mar 5, 2026Results posted

Community Trial in the Cherokee Nation

An interventional study of Connect Program and Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) in Opioid Abuse, sponsored by Emory University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
919
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The target population is students attending high schools in small rural towns in the 14 counties that partially or fully fall within the Cherokee Nation reservation. Following recruitment of 20 school-based clusters, clusters are allocated to either the intervention condition or delayed-intervention control condition using constrained randomization. Constrained randomization helps to ensure balanced cluster sizes as well as similar levels of risk between the intervention and control at baseline. Study participants include all 10th grade students enrolled in the participating study high schools and students will be followed into the first year after their expected graduation.

Read the detailed description

The national public health opioid crisis has disproportionately burdened rural White populations, and disproportionately burdened American Indian populations. Therefore, the Cherokee Nation (CN) and Emory University public health scientists have designed an opioid prevention trial to be conducted in at-risk rural communities in the CN (in northeast Oklahoma) with primarily White and American Indian adolescents and young adults. The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate a theory-based, integrated multi-level community intervention designed to prevent the onset and escalation of opioid and other drug misuse. The researchers propose a cluster randomized trial building directly on the success of their most recent previous trial, which demonstrated that the intervention effectively reduced alcohol and other drug use among American Indian and other youth living within the CN. Two distinct intervention approaches-community organizing as implemented in the established Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) intervention protocol, and universal school-based brief intervention and referral as implemented in the established Connect intervention protocol -will be expanded and integrated to further enhance effects in preventing and reducing opioid misuse. The CMCA and Connect interventions were originally designed to target adolescent alcohol use but nevertheless showed significant beneficial effects on use of other drugs, including prescription drug misuse. The proposed study will: (1) further improve the design of the interventions with increased focus on opioids, (2) test the expanded, integrated versions in a cluster randomized trial, and (3) design and test new systems for sustained implementation within existing structures of the Cherokee Nation. Building upon the extant prevention science evidence, this study will respond to a gap in evidence concerning opioid misuse prevention among at-risk adolescents transitioning to young adulthood among American Indian and other rural youth.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Abuse

Keywords

  • American Indian
  • Cherokee Nation
  • Community intervention
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 919 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,386 studies on the registry; 236 are open to participants now.

Of its 229 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 174 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Tenth grade students enrolled in the participating high schools

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to understand written or verbal English

Inclusion criteria for high schools:

  • Counties that partially or fully fall within the Cherokee Nation reservation
  • Town population of 3,000 or less
  • Class size between 30 to 100 students

Exclusion criteria for high schools:

  • Metropolitan and micropolitan cores (Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes of 1 and 4)
  • Existence of a community drug prevention coalition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
919 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Preventive Intervention

    Students in schools assigned to the preventive intervention study condition will take part in the Connect school-based prevention program and the community-level Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) intervention.

    Behavioral: Connect Program · Behavioral: Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA)

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Students in schools assigned to the control group will not receive the Connect and CMCA interventions. Schools in the control group will receive usual school and community prevention and will be offered the trial's programs after the end of this three-year study.

Interventions

  • BehavioralConnect Program

    The Connect program includes school-based screening, brief intervention and referral, and will be treated as part of the participating schools' prevention programs. A computer-based screening and brief intervention will be supported by Cherokee Nation Behavioral Health (CNBH) supervised Connect coaches universally, to reduce potential stigma associated with speaking to a Connect coach and to reinforce drug free norms among all students. Follow-up of moderate to high-risk youth will be conducted by a Connect Coach through Zoom, other electronic communication, or in-person visits, with referral to Cherokee Nation or community services if deemed necessary.

  • BehavioralCommunities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA)

    The community-level intervention Communities Mobilizing for Change and Action (CMCA) will involve educating and organizing of adult volunteers and consent will be assumed by their participation. Trainings and tools will be provided, including Family Action Kits, to support local families, community organizations and citizens, including information on national and local opioid and other drug use, evidence-based policies, programs and practices, and how to motivate and create family and local action for drug prevention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Days of Alcohol Use

    The number of days of alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  2. Number of Days of Heavy Alcohol Use

    The number of days of heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  3. Number of Days of Marijuana Use

    The number of days of marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  4. Number of Days of Opioid Misuse

    The number of days of opioid drug misuse use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Social Support From Parent/Caregiver

    Social support from parents/caregivers is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  2. Social Support From Friend

    Social support from a friend is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  3. Social Support From Teacher

    Social support from a teacher is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  4. Social Support From Other Adult

    Social support from an adult, other than a parent/caregiver or teacher, is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  5. Perceived Availability of Alcohol

    Ease or difficulty in accessing alcohol is assessed with 4 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  6. Perceived Availability of Marijuana

    Ease or difficulty in accessing marijuana is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  7. Perceived Availability of Prescription Opioids

    Ease or difficulty in accessing prescription opioids is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  8. Social Normative Beliefs About Alcohol Use

    Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people drinking alcohol. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  9. Social Normative Beliefs About Marijuana

    Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people using marijuana. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  10. Social Normative Beliefs About Prescription Opioids

    Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people missing prescription opioids. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  11. Self-Efficacy

    Self-efficacy is assessed with 3 items asking how easy or hard it would be for participants to ask for help or refuse alcohol or drugs. Responses given on a 4-point scale, where 1 = very easy and 4 = very hard. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating increased self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  12. Normative Estimates of Peer Drug Use

    Normative estimates of peer drug use (alcohol, marijuana, prescription opioid misuse) are assessed with 3 items asking about how many of their peers in school used drugs in the past year. Possible responses are 1 = none or almost none, 2 = less than half, 3 = about half, 4 = more than half, and 5 = almost all or all. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher normative estimates of peer drug use.

    Time frame: Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)

  13. Proportion of Participants With Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

    Model predicted proportion of participants with alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

    Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

  14. Proportion of Participants With Heavy Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

    Model predicted proportion of participants with heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

    Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

  15. Proportion of Participants With Marijuana Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

    Model predicted proportion of participants with marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

    Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

  16. Number of Participants With Opioid Drug Misuse 6 Months Post-Graduation

    The number of participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in the past 30 days at the survey administered 6-month post-graduation.

    Time frame: 6 Months Post-Graduation

07

Results

Posted Apr 30, 2025

Participant flow

A total of 919 participants were enrolled from 20 high schools in the Cherokee Nation Reservation, in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, USA. Participant enrollment began on September 29, 2021 (the day of the Baseline survey) and the assessment at the end of high school (spring of 12th grade) occurred on May 17, 2024. The final study assessment for the 6-months post-graduation time point occurred on December 31, 2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePreventive InterventionControl Group
Started465454
Completed 6 months post-graduation assessment214196
Completed330307
Not completed135147
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up135147

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Days of Alcohol Use

The number of days of alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · days
Number of Days of Alcohol Use
daysPreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.71 ± 0.170.58 ± 0.14
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.70 ± 0.160.70 ± 0.16
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.69 ± 0.150.84 ± 0.18
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.68 ± 0.161.01 ± 0.22
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.66 ± 0.171.21 ± 0.28
PrimaryNumber of Days of Heavy Alcohol Use

The number of days of heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · days
Number of Days of Heavy Alcohol Use
daysPreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.51 ± 0.110.30 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.50 ± 0.100.40 ± 0.09
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.48 ± 0.100.52 ± 0.11
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.47 ± 0.100.68 ± 0.14
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.46 ± 0.110.90 ± 0.20
PrimaryNumber of Days of Marijuana Use

The number of days of marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · days
Number of Days of Marijuana Use
daysPreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.53 ± 0.201.71 ± 0.22
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.50 ± 0.181.88 ± 0.21
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.46 ± 0.182.07 ± 0.23
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.44 ± 0.192.28 ± 0.27
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.41 ± 0.222.51 ± 0.35
PrimaryNumber of Days of Opioid Misuse

The number of days of opioid drug misuse use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · days
Number of Days of Opioid Misuse
daysPreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade0.24 ± 0.090.07 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade0.19 ± 0.070.10 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade0.15 ± 0.050.13 ± 0.05
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade0.12 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade0.10 ± 0.050.23 ± 0.10
SecondarySocial Support From Parent/Caregiver

Social support from parents/caregivers is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Support From Parent/Caregiver
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.50 ± 0.033.45 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.50 ± 0.033.47 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.49 ± 0.023.48 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.49 ± 0.033.50 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.49 ± 0.033.51 ± 0.03
SecondarySocial Support From Friend

Social support from a friend is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Support From Friend
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.43 ± 0.033.39 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.43 ± 0.033.40 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.44 ± 0.033.41 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.44 ± 0.033.43 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.44 ± 0.043.44 ± 0.04
SecondarySocial Support From Teacher

Social support from a teacher is assessed with 6 items, which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Support From Teacher
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.25 ± 0.033.19 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.27 ± 0.033.22 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.29 ± 0.033.25 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.31 ± 0.033.28 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.33 ± 0.043.31 ± 0.04
SecondarySocial Support From Other Adult

Social support from an adult, other than a parent/caregiver or teacher, is assessed with 6 items which are responded to on a 4-point scale where 1 = never and 4 = often. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater support.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Support From Other Adult
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade3.05 ± 0.053.06 ± 0.05
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade3.09 ± 0.043.09 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade3.14 ± 0.043.11 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade3.18 ± 0.053.13 ± 0.05
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade3.22 ± 0.053.15 ± 0.05
SecondaryPerceived Availability of Alcohol

Ease or difficulty in accessing alcohol is assessed with 4 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Perceived Availability of Alcohol
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.18 ± 0.072.22 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.20 ± 0.062.27 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.22 ± 0.062.32 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.24 ± 0.072.37 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.26 ± 0.072.42 ± 0.07
SecondaryPerceived Availability of Marijuana

Ease or difficulty in accessing marijuana is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Perceived Availability of Marijuana
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.04 ± 0.072.10 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.06 ± 0.072.14 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.08 ± 0.072.18 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.10 ± 0.072.23 ± 0.07
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.12 ± 0.072.27 ± 0.07
SecondaryPerceived Availability of Prescription Opioids

Ease or difficulty in accessing prescription opioids is assessed with 5 items using a 4-point scale where 1 = very difficult to get and 4 = very easy to get. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater ease of availability.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Perceived Availability of Prescription Opioids
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.52 ± 0.041.47 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.51 ± 0.031.49 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.49 ± 0.031.51 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.48 ± 0.031.53 ± 0.04
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.47 ± 0.041.55 ± 0.04
SecondarySocial Normative Beliefs About Alcohol Use

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people drinking alcohol. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Normative Beliefs About Alcohol Use
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.11 ± 0.032.03 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.10 ± 0.032.02 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.10 ± 0.032.01 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.09 ± 0.032.00 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.08 ± 0.031.99 ± 0.03
SecondarySocial Normative Beliefs About Marijuana

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people using marijuana. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Normative Beliefs About Marijuana
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.16 ± 0.032.08 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.16 ± 0.032.09 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.16 ± 0.032.09 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.16 ± 0.032.09 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.15 ± 0.042.10 ± 0.04
SecondarySocial Normative Beliefs About Prescription Opioids

Participants are asked 4 items to assess if they think various social groups (parents, community adults, peers, self) disapprove of young people missing prescription opioids. Responses are given as 1 = don't disapprove, 2 = disapprove, and 3 = strongly disapprove. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating stronger disapproval.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Social Normative Beliefs About Prescription Opioids
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.54 ± 0.032.46 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.55 ± 0.022.49 ± 0.02
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.56 ± 0.022.51 ± 0.02
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.57 ± 0.032.54 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.58 ± 0.032.56 ± 0.03
SecondarySelf-Efficacy

Self-efficacy is assessed with 3 items asking how easy or hard it would be for participants to ask for help or refuse alcohol or drugs. Responses given on a 4-point scale, where 1 = very easy and 4 = very hard. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating increased self-efficacy.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Self-Efficacy
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade1.59 ± 0.031.65 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade1.58 ± 0.021.64 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade1.57 ± 0.021.63 ± 0.02
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade1.55 ± 0.031.62 ± 0.03
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade1.54 ± 0.041.60 ± 0.04
SecondaryNormative Estimates of Peer Drug Use

Normative estimates of peer drug use (alcohol, marijuana, prescription opioid misuse) are assessed with 3 items asking about how many of their peers in school used drugs in the past year. Possible responses are 1 = none or almost none, 2 = less than half, 3 = about half, 4 = more than half, and 5 = almost all or all. The total score is expressed as the mean across items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher normative estimates of peer drug use.

Time frame:
Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Normative Estimates of Peer Drug Use
score on a scalePreventive InterventionControl Group
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 10th Grade2.50 ± 0.062.51 ± 0.06
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 11th Grade2.45 ± 0.062.52 ± 0.06
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 11th Grade2.41 ± 0.062.52 ± 0.06
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Fall of 12th Grade2.36 ± 0.062.52 ± 0.06
Baseline (Fall of 10th Grade) to Spring of 12th Grade2.32 ± 0.072.52 ± 0.07
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

Model predicted proportion of participants with alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

Time frame:
6 Months Post-Graduation
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation
proportion of participantsPreventive InterventionControl Group
Proportion of Participants With Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation0.30 (0.23 to 0.37)0.47 (0.39 to 0.55)
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Heavy Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

Model predicted proportion of participants with heavy alcohol use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. Heavy alcohol use is defined as having at least four (among young women) or five (among young men) alcoholic drinks within a couple of hours. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

Time frame:
6 Months Post-Graduation
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Heavy Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation
proportion of participantsPreventive InterventionControl Group
Proportion of Participants With Heavy Alcohol Use 6 Months Post-Graduation0.15 (0.10 to 0.21)0.25 (0.19 to 0.33)
SecondaryProportion of Participants With Marijuana Use 6 Months Post-Graduation

Model predicted proportion of participants with marijuana use in the past 30 days is compared between study arms. The Least Squares Mean values are limited to the 6-month post-graduation time point while adjusting for baseline use.

Time frame:
6 Months Post-Graduation
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Participants With Marijuana Use 6 Months Post-Graduation
proportion of participantsPreventive InterventionControl Group
Proportion of Participants With Marijuana Use 6 Months Post-Graduation0.12 (0.08 to 0.19)0.20 (0.13 to 0.27)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Opioid Drug Misuse 6 Months Post-Graduation

The number of participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in the past 30 days at the survey administered 6-month post-graduation.

Time frame:
6 Months Post-Graduation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Opioid Drug Misuse 6 Months Post-Graduation
ParticipantsPreventive InterventionControl Group
Number of Participants With Opioid Drug Misuse 6 Months Post-Graduation13

Adverse events

Collected over Information on adverse events was collected on days when the surveys were administered, during the period of time of survey administration. Surveys were administered each fall and spring semester from baseline (fall of 10th grade) to spring of 12th grade (up to 31 months and 19 days). Adverse events were not collected during the survey administered at 6-months post-graduation.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Preventive Intervention0/465 (0%)0/465 (0%)0/465 (0%)
Control Group0/454 (0%)0/454 (0%)0/454 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Mean15.5 ± 0.615.6 ± 0.715.5 ± 0.7
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Female230214444
Male215222437
Decline to answer201535
Missing033
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
American Indian Only130136266
White Only174149323
American Indian and White102103205
Other5561116
Missing459
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
United States465454919
Participants reporting alcohol use in past 30 days
Participants reporting alcohol use in past 30 days(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Alcohol use reported7492166
Missing response527
Participants reporting heavy alcohol use in past 30 days
Participants reporting heavy alcohol use in past 30 days(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Heavy alcohol use reported435295
Missing response4711
Participants reporting marijuana use in past 30 days
Participants reporting marijuana use in past 30 days(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Marijuana use reported6868136
Missing response7916
Participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in past 30 days
Participants reporting prescription opioid misuse in past 30 days(Participants)Preventive InterventionControl GroupTotal
Prescription opioid misuse reported211738
Missing response121830
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cherokee Nation Reservation
    Tahlequah, Oklahoma 74464, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Komro KA, Livingston MD, Skinner JR, Livingston BJ, Kominsky TK, Jagtiani A, Barry CM, Wagenaar AC, Cooper HLF, Harmon M, Ivanich E, LaBounty H, Gassaway AN, Talavera-Brown SL. Primary Prevention of Drug Overdoses in Rural Low-Resource and Tribal Communities: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Am J Public Health. 2025 Sep;115(9):1508-1517. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308205. PubMed 40768695 ↗
  • Jagtiani A, Livingston MD, Barry CM, Talavera-Brown S, LaBounty H, Skinner JR, Livingston BJ, Lincoln AN, Komro KA. Tribal Identity, Pain Interference, and Substance Use Among American Indian and Alaska Native Adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;178(11):1192-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.3284. PubMed 39312248 ↗
  • Komro KA, Kominsky TK, Skinner JR, Livingston MD, Livingston BJ, Avance K, Lincoln AN, Barry CM, Walker AL, Pettigrew DW, Merlo LJ, Cooper HLF, Wagenaar AC. Study protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a school, family, and community intervention for preventing drug misuse among older adolescents in the Cherokee Nation. Trials. 2022 Feb 23;23(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06096-0. PubMed 35197100 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 15, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Mar 30, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified participant data will be available for sharing, provided all data requests are reviewed and approved by the Cherokee Nation Institutional Review Board (IRB). Data and associated documentation sharing requires a negotiated data-sharing agreement that provides for: 1) review and approval of the data request and study protocol by the Cherokee Nation IRB, 2) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes, 3) restrictions against attempting to identify study participants, 4) a commitment to securing the data using secure computer technology, 5) a commitment to destroying data after the specific requested analyses are completed, 6) agreement to submit all presentations and manuscripts to the appropriate tribal authorities for review and approval prior to public dissemination and publication, 7) reporting responsibilities to the Cherokee Nation, 8) restrictions on redistribution of the data to third parties, and 9) proper acknowledgement of the source of the data.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04839978
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Kelli Komro (Professor, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2021
Start date
Sep 29, 2021
Primary completion
May 17, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Results posted
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Study contacts

Kelli Komro, PhD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion