An observational study in Necrotising Fasciitis, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-23.
Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Observational
The primary objective of this work is to determine if fluorescence signal intensity changes from a vascular perfusion fluorophore (indocyanine green) can be associated with the presence of necrotizing fasciitis.
Hypothesis - Tissue regions affected with necrotizing fasciitis will demonstrate reduced fluorescence intensity compared to an unaffected region without clinical evidence of necrotizing fasciitis.
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF)-commonly known as 'flesh-eating bacteria'-is an aggressive soft-tissue infection that has a high mortality rate (30-50%). NF is generally associated with traumatic inoculation of extremely aggressive bacteria into the soft-tissues surrounding the fascial layer of connective tissue, just deep to the subcutaneous fat. This tissue layer provides an ideal environment for bacterial growth and also facilitates rapid advancement of the bacteria along the fascia. The result is a soft-tissue infection that often spreads centrally prior to detection and/or adequate management, leading to systemic sepsis, multi-organ failure, and death.
Further complicating NF management is that there is no definitive diagnostic test. Patients with NF present generally with pain, fever, and elevated inflammatory labs (white blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP)), other lab abnormalities (elevated glucose and creatinine; reduced sodium and hemoglobin); however, these are non-specific findings that are associated with numerous other-nonfatal-conditions. For this reason, a diagnosis of NF is often missed until the condition has progressed too far.
Medical fluorescence is a nascent form of medical imaging that seeks to improve the recognition of important anatomical structures and disease processes through machine-assisted, visual identification using fluorescent probes called fluorophores. Several types of fluorophores exist: targeted fluorophores, enzyme-activated fluorophores, and simple intravascular fluorophores.
Intravascular fluorophores, primarily indocyanine green (ICG), have been available for \~100 years. ICG is FDA approved and has an excellent safety record with no demonstrable toxicity. When injected intravenously and viewed with an appropriate fluorescence imager, ICG effectively maps out the local vasculature, enabling the viewer to distinguish perfused and non-perfused tissues. ICG's FDA-approved indications and uses include angiography to determine cardiac output, hepatic function, liver blood flow, and ophthalmic anatomy.
Upon histological examination of tissues affected by NF, there exist four commonly observed features: 1) the presence of bacteria; 2) robust neutrophil infiltration; 3) tissue necrosis; 4) vascular thrombosis. DH-H Department of Pathology currently reviews tissue biopsies with respect to these criteria when evaluating tissue for the presence of necrotizing fasciitis (Soloman et al, Modern Pathology, 2018, pp 546-552). While useful to guide clinical decision-making, histological review is not considered to be a definitive diagnostic finding, but these observations do have moderate sensitivity and specificity with culture data, which is considered to be the ultimate determinant of an NF diagnosis.
Because of the profound pro-thrombotic effects of necrotizing fasciitis within the subcutaneous tissues, we hypothesize that the administration of ICG and subsequent imaging of a bodily region affected with NF will demonstrate substantially reduced fluorescence compared to the patient's unaffected tissues. If we can demonstrate that ICG fluorescence voids are characteristic of NF, this could potentially lead to a more rapid, and potentially more accurate, diagnosis of NF that would lead to more rapid definitive management and-likely-improved outcomes.
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate whether ICG fluorescence may be used as a non-invasive method of identifying the presence of NF.
28 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 152 across 16 observational studies indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing.
Browse Fasciitis, Necrotizing studies →Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 488 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.
Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (68%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subjects presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with clinical suspicion for necrotizing fasciitis (history, exam, lab studies, imaging studies).
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Biopsy and archival tissue
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients with clinical suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis would receive a weight-appropriate IV dose of indocyanine green (ICG, FDA-approved) with immediate fluorescence imaging of the affected body part and simultaneous imaging of an unaffected region
Drug: Indocyanine green solution
Patients with clinical suspicion of necrotizing fasciitis would receive a weight-appropriate IV dose of indocyanine green (ICG, FDA-approved) with immediate fluorescence imaging of the affected body part and simultaneous imaging of an unaffected region
Diagnosis of Necrotising Fascitis using indocyanine green
Administration of ICG and subsequent imaging of a bodily region affected with NF will demonstrate substantially reduced fluorescence compared to the patient's unaffected tissues. Demonstration that ICG fluorescence voids are characteristic of NF.
Time frame: One Day
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center →