An interventional study of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® in Necrotizing Fascitis and Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection, sponsored by Benjamin T. Miller. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.
Sponsored by Benjamin T. Miller · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, pilot, parallel group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. This will be a single center study coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio. Data will be collected in a secure manner using REDCap housed at CCF. The study will consist of 2 arms: treatment with Cytal® Wound Matrix 2-Layer and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) versus standard of care dressings. Wound debridement procedures will be performed by surgical staff at CCF. A co-investigator trained in the application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® will apply these treatments as outlined in section 6.1.2 Administration. This study will be conducted with IRB approval and written informed consent of each participant enrolled. The trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov before the first participant is enrolled.
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a type of soft tissue infection that is characterized by necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues and muscle fascia. Prompt diagnosis and surgical exploration are crucial in the management of these potentially fatal infections.1,2 For most patients, this requires an initial extensive, wide debridement with repeated inspection and debridement every 24-48 hours to remove all necrotic tissue.3 As a result, tissue reconstruction often necessitates flap surgery with autologous, split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for sufficient coverage. The process during which the wound bed becomes ready for skin grafting can be lengthy, arduous, and often times costly. Post-discharge regimens may consist of pain management for daily dressing changes, nutritional supplements, multiple follow up visits in clinic and likely the involvement of a plastic and reconstructive surgeon.4 Therefore, strategies to promote the healing of these wounds may significantly improve the morbidity of this disease.
One such adjunct to the management of wounds is the use of mammalian-derived extracellular matrices (ECM). Multiple published case reports have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ECM in the healing process of complex wounds.5-12 A randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with chronic venous ulcers using an ECM derived from the submucosal layers of the porcine jejunum.8 Their findings demonstrated significant improvement in wound healing as compared to a standard-care group at 12 weeks of treatment (55% vs 34%, p = 0.196).
Cytal® and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) are acellular, ECM products derived from porcine bladder epithelial basement membrane and tunica propria. It is thought that these products provide an optimal environment for healing by providing a scaffold for tissue regeneration and promoting neovascularization. These products have previously been demonstrated to improve healing in NF wounds.9-12 However, to date, there have been no randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of ECM in the healing of NF wounds. We hypothesize that wound beds treated with Cytal® and MicroMatrix® will have a significantly decreased time to skin graft readiness as compared to those treated with standard of care wound management.
This is a prospective, pilot, parallel group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. This will be a single center study coordinated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio. Data will be collected in a secure manner using REDCap housed at CCF. The study will consist of 2 arms: treatment with Cytal® Wound Matrix 2-Layer and MicroMatrix® (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro Township, NJ, U.S.A.) versus standard of care dressings. Wound debridement procedures will be performed by surgical staff at CCF. A co-investigator trained in the application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix® will apply these treatments as outlined in section 6.1.2 Administration. This study will be conducted with IRB approval and written informed consent of each participant enrolled. The trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.gov before the first participant is enrolled.
28 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 74 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Fasciitis, Necrotizing.
Browse Fasciitis, Necrotizing studies →Benjamin T. Miller is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
This arm will receive application of Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix®
Device: Cytal® Wound Matrix · Device: MicroMatrix®
This is the only study to use this intervention in necrotizing soft tissue wounds
This is the only study to use this intervention in necrotizing soft tissue wounds
Time to readiness for grafting of the wound bed
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
Relative wound healing as assessed by the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT)
Relative wound healing as assessed by the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT) between the two study arms
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
Assess the relative rate of wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and need for re-intervention (including incision and drainage)
To assess the relative rate of wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and need for re-intervention (including incision and drainage) between the treated and untreated wound beds
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess the rate of product excision resulting from wound complications, allergic reaction, or intolerance to the product
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess relative rates of wound closure, measured as the proportion of the remaining wound area compared to the starting wound area
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess relative skin graft size as a percentage of starting wound area
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
To assess the relative percentages of skin graft take
Time frame: From randomization to readiness for grating, up to 12 weeks
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Benjamin T. Miller