ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04836143Updated Apr 8, 2021

Eyes That Do Not Meet the Eligibility Criteria of Clinical Trials on Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Proportion of the Real-World Patient Population and Reasons for Exclusion

An observational study in Age-related Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Kim's Eye Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-08.

Sponsored by Kim's Eye Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
512
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the proportion of eyes that do not meet the eligibility criteria of clinical trials on neovascular AMD among the entire sample of eyes diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. The eligibility criteria of the VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) studies, were used for this investigation.

Read the detailed description

Neovascular AMD is one of the primary causes of severe visual impairment in developed countries. Previously, laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy was used as its mainstay treatment. However, the efficacy of these treatment modalities has obvious limitations. In 2006, the FDA-approved anti-VEGF agent, ranibizumab, was introduced, followed by aflibercept in 2012. In addition, the off-label use of bevacizumab has been widely adopted. The introduction of these anti-VEGF agents has markedly improved the treatment outcomes of neovascular AMD, resulting in a significant decrease in the rate of visual loss and blindness. Currently, clinical trials are actively being performed to develop better treatment methods for neovascular AMD.

In general, conducting clinical trials are expensive and require years to complete. Therefore, estimating the time required to complete the planned patient enrollment is essential for establishing an efficient clinical trial plan. Clinical trials are usually conducted in a controlled environment and have sophisticated eligibility criteria. Thus, all patients cannot be enrolled into a trial, and some of them, or sometimes the majority of them, are excluded on the basis of the eligibility criteria.

Estimation of the proportion of patients in the study population who do not meet the eligibility criteria is important for several reasons. First, it may help to identify whether the results of the clinical trial can be applied to the real-world patients. Secondly, it may also help to predict the time required to finish the planned patient enrollment. In addition, if a particular set of criteria results in the exclusion of a relatively large number of patients, patient enrollment in future clinical trials could be accelerated by modifying some of these criteria. Furthermore, since the characteristics of neovascular AMD differ between Asian and Caucasian populations, obtaining data on Asian populations would be of great value.

Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the proportion of eyes that do not meet the eligibility criteria of clinical trials on neovascular AMD among the entire sample of eyes diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. The eligibility criteria of the VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) studies, were used for this investigation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

  • Age-related Macular Degeneration
  • Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 512 is above the median of 110 across 409 observational studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Kim's Eye Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients diagnosed with treatment-naive active neovascular AMD and were treated with anti-VEGF

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with treatment-naïve, active neovascular AMD between January 2017 and December 2017.
  • Patients aged ≥ 50 years old
  • Patients who received intravitreal anti-VEGF injection after the diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
512 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DrugIntravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection

    Intravitreal injection of either ranibizumab or aflibercept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of eyes that do not meet the eligibility criteria of clinical trials on neovascular AMD among the entire sample of eyes diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD

    The proportion of eyes that do not meet the eligibility criteria of clinical trials on neovascular AMD among the entire sample of eyes diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. The eligibility criteria of the VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) studies, were used for this investigation.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jae Hui Kim
    Seoul, 150-034, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V, Korobelnik JF, Kaiser PK, Nguyen QD, Kirchhof B, Ho A, Ogura Y, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Soo Y, Anderesi M, Groetzbach G, Sommerauer B, Sandbrink R, Simader C, Schmidt-Erfurth U; VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 Study Groups. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17. Erratum In: Ophthalmology. 2013 Jan;120(1):209-10. PubMed 23084240 ↗
  • Moore TJ, Zhang H, Anderson G, Alexander GC. Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1451-1457. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3931. PubMed 30264133 ↗
  • Sertkaya A, Wong HH, Jessup A, Beleche T. Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):117-26. doi: 10.1177/1740774515625964. Epub 2016 Feb 8. PubMed 26908540 ↗
  • Kim JH, Chang YS, Kim JW, Kim CG, Lee DW. Age-related differences in the prevalence of subtypes of Neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the first diagnosed eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):891-898. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-04228-4. Epub 2019 Jan 7. PubMed 30617580 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04836143
Lead sponsor
Kim's Eye Hospital
Responsible party
Jae Hui Kim (Consultant, Kim's Eye Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 8, 2021
Start date
Aug 26, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2020
Completion
Jul 26, 2020
Last update
Apr 8, 2021

Study contacts

Jae Hui Kim, M.D.
principal investigator · Kim's Eye Hospital, South Korea

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion