CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04827355Updated Apr 8, 2025

Reflux Band in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

An interventional study of External Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device and Sham Device in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This 12 week biomarker targeted double blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll subjects with salivary pepsin positive laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to assess efficacy of the external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, also known as the Reflux Band. Subjects will be randomized to one of two arms: control or experimental. Following the 8 week intervention period subjects in both arms will continue in a 4 week unblinded period. The primary hypothesis is that a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the experimental arm will meet the primary endpoint for symptom response, compared to subjects in the control arm.

Read the detailed description

This study seeks to understand if the Reflux Band is an effective treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in comparison to a sham device. LPR is a syndrome in which acid that is made in the stomach travels up the esophagus and into the throat, causing chronic symptoms including throat clearing, voice hoarseness, sore throat, etc. Participation in the study may or may not benefit you directly, and may result in new knowledge that may help others.

Participation in this study involves: 3 - 4 in person visits (2 of which are part of standard of care) ranging from 30 - 45 minutes each and 2 virtual visits, either by phone or video, each 15 minutes. Participants are assigned with a 50/50 chance (similar to a coin flip) via a computer generator to receive the Reflux Band or sham device (a device that will not provide you medical therapy) which they will wear around their neck nightly while sleeping (6+ hours) over a duration of 8 weeks. The Reflux Band, which has been cleared for use by the FDA, applies pressure to the outside of the neck at the cricoid cartilage, at the middle of the neck, and increases the internal pressure of the muscle separating the throat from the esophagus (upper esophageal sphincter). Participants will only wear the band while sleeping at night and remove in the morning upon waking. The in person visits will occur at one of these UCSD La Jolla locations: the Perlman Medical Office Gastroenterology clinic, the Center for Voice and Swallowing, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute (ACTRI) Clinic.

There is an optional 4 week extension at the end of this study in which the Reflux Band will be refit (if sham) to provide the manufacturer's specified pressure. This portion contains 1 virtual follow up during week 10 and an in person follow up during week 12, at which time study participation will conclude.

The most commonly expected risks of the study are skin reaction, discomfort, and difficulty sleeping. These were generally mild and short in duration. No serious risks were observed when the Reflux Band was worn around the neck in previous studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Keywords

  • Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI)
  • Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,066 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is close to the median of 72 across 711 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults between 18-99, English or Spanish speaking
  • ≥8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (dysphonia, throat clearing, cough, globus, and/or sore throat)
  • Current use of double daily dose acid suppression therapy (ex. omeprazole 40mg, omeprazole 20mg and famotidine 20mg)
  • Laryngoscopic exam prior to screening with current symptoms
  • At least 1 of the following:

    • Elevated reflux testing
    • Findings on upper endoscopy that are consistent with pathologic GERD
    • Fasting pepsin analysis result of ≥25 ng/mL within 4 months of enrollment (12 months if treatment plan has not changed) *testing allowed at enrollment if not previously obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of Reflux Band (UES Compression Device)
  • Sino-pulmonary conditions (such as asthma, COPD, post-nasal drip, heavy voice use) as primary etiology of laryngeal symptoms as deemed by treating gastroenterologist and / or laryngologist
  • Laryngeal mass or lesion on laryngoscopy
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Unable to consent in English or Spanish
  • Imprisoned
  • Patients with a prior foregut surgery
  • Patients with a known achalasia diagnosis
  • Inability to fast for 4 hours
  • Active tobacco use
  • Supplemental oxygen use
  • Contraindication to UES Compression Device manufacturer guidelines:
  • Patients with implants or implant parts that reside in the area where Reflux Band is applied: implanted pacemarker, implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), vagus nerve stimulator (VNS), or other such devices implanted in the neck
  • Patients diagnosed with glaucoma.
  • Patients who had a malignancy of the neck, including neck surgery.
  • Patients that may have an altered mental status including due to the use of sedative drugs or narcotics.
  • Patients with carotid artery disease, uncontrolled thyroid disease, a history of cerebrovascular disease, or connective tissue disorder of Marfan's Syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
  • Patients who use nocturnal NIV machines such as CPAP or BiPAP.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Participants allocated to the control arm will be fit with the UES Compression Device at a pressure known not to provide intervention.

    Device: Sham Device

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Participants allocated to the experimental arm will be fit with the UES Compression Device according to manufacturer guidelines.

    Device: External Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device

Interventions

  • DeviceExternal Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device

    External Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device fit to manufacturer guidelines.

    Also known as: Reflux Band, Reza Band

  • DeviceSham Device

    External Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) Compression Device fit to pressure known not to provide treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure response to the UES Compression Device in pepsin positive LPR.

    Change in reflux symptom index score (primary outcome) between intervention versus sham arm will determine device efficacy.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measure pepsin response to the UES Compression Device in pepsin positive LPR.

    Change in salivary pepsin concentration between pre and post treatment.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;101(8):1900-20; quiz 1943. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x. PubMed 16928254 ↗
  • Olson NR. Laryngopharyngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Oct;24(5):1201-13. PubMed 1754220 ↗
  • Cohen SM, Pitman MJ, Noordzij JP, Courey M. Management of dysphonic patients by otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;147(2):289-94. doi: 10.1177/0194599812440780. Epub 2012 Feb 24. PubMed 22368039 ↗
  • Ruiz R, Jeswani S, Andrews K, Rafii B, Paul BC, Branski RC, Amin MR. Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a survey of primary care physician practice patterns. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Mar;140(3):192-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.6533. PubMed 24481258 ↗
  • Litvinov AV. [Method of tracheobronchial spraying of drugs in aerosols]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1976 Jan;116(1):100-1. No abstract available. Russian. PubMed 1020172 ↗
  • de Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E, Martinucci I, Bellini M, Fattori B, Ceccarelli L, Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ricchiuti A, Savarino V, Berrettini S, Marchi S. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363. PubMed 22969200 ↗
  • Shaker R, Babaei A, Naini SR. Prevention of esophagopharyngeal reflux by augmenting the upper esophageal sphincter pressure barrier. Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1002/lary.24735. Epub 2014 Jun 27. PubMed 24782387 ↗
  • Slivers SL, Vaezi MF, Vakil MB, et al. Prospective study of upper esophageal sphincter assist device for treating extraesophageal reflux. Otolaryngol Open J. 2016; 2(1): 31-38. doi: 10.17140/OTLOJ-2-109
  • Yadlapati R, Craft J, Adkins CJ, Pandolfino JE. The Upper Esophageal Sphincter Assist Device Is Associated With Symptom Response in Reflux-Associated Laryngeal Symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;16(10):1670-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Jan 31. PubMed 29408585 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Sep 5, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared with other researchers.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04827355
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Rena Yadlapati (Professor of Clinical Medicine, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
Start date
May 7, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Study contacts

Rena Yadlapati, MD, MSHS
principal investigator · UC San Diego Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion