CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04815538Updated Mar 26, 2021

The Relationship Between Workplace Environment and Metabolic Syndrome in Different Industries

An observational study in Metabolic Syndrome, Protection Against, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-26.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
156
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The prevalence of MetS and its components among industrial workers and its risk factors correlates among them and compare them with those in employees from a nonindustrial setting, and explore the influence of different industries on hematological parameters especially WBCs derangement

Read the detailed description

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), an important risk factor for Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD), is associated with a 2-fold increase in consequences of CVD and 1.5-fold increase in the total mortality . The term MetS refers to a clustering of CVD risk factors including abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, high blood glucose, high levels of blood triglycerides, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. An inappropriate lifestyle is one of the most important risk factors for MetS and CVD . Likely, Workplace and working conditions can affect an employee's lifestyle including dietary intake, physical activity, sleep pattern, and their hobbies.

Workplace environment may also affect the occurrence of metabolic syndrome, Air pollution is another risk factor that can increase the risk of metabolic disorders. Recent epidemiological and experimental studies have reported an association between increased level of air pollution with insulin resistance, weight gain, and obesity . Air pollution is higher in some industrial work environments, including those of the gas and petrochemical industries. This may also increase the risk of MetS and CVD among employees of those workplaces. Few studies have assessed the health of employees in industrial workplaces. However, the working conditions of industrial workplace can have a significant impact on the lifestyle and health of employees.

The prevalence of metabolic syndrome has recently been suggested to vary greatly depending on the subject's business category; high prevalence of metabolic syndrome has been reported among the retired, unemployed, bus drivers, university employees, and workers in the agricultural industry , oil industry , and health care sector .

Type of occupation is also important in development of metabolic syndrome. For example, the incidence of metabolic syndrome in the white-collar workers are higher than other male workers. Those with sedentary or shift work carry a higher risk of metabolic syndrome. The incidence of metabolic syndrome is 2.3-fold higher in those working for 10 or more hours per day.

Multiple studies have linked benzene exposure with the abnormality of hematologic parameters, such as the reduction in the counts of white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), neutrophil, and lymphocyte, even at low exposure levels (\< 1 ppm). A decreased WBC count has been considered as a key clinical sign of benzene-induced hematotoxicity.

However, studies investigating the relationship between work environment and metabolic syndrome in our region are scarce. We therefore, conducted this study to determine the relationship between work environment and metabolic syndrome among a petrochemical workers \& non industrial workers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolic Syndrome, Protection Against
03

In context

Metabolic Syndrome

1,963 studies on the registry are indexed under Metabolic Syndrome; 329 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 156 is below the median of 200 across 458 observational studies indexed under Metabolic Syndrome.

Browse Metabolic Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

active exposed industrial workers in selected factories

Inclusion criteria

  • Active workers more than 1 year in selected plants with matched controls from employee of Assiut University.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Workers who had been working for less than 1 year in their petrochemical plants
  2. Workers with self-reported and/or diagnosed carcinomas, hematological diseases, and/or immune diseases.
  3. Workers taking any medicine in the preceding 2 weeks affecting lipid profile \& blood picture.
  4. Workers unwilling to provide biological samples or doing so in insufficient volume.
  5. Workers diagnosed MetS and its components before joing the petrochemical industry.
  6. Workers with morbid obesity BMI > 40
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
156 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • industrial workers

    Active workers more than 1 year in petrochemical plant, fertilizer factory , electrical station and food industry

    Behavioral: the subscale of Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II

  • control group

    office work unexposed

    Behavioral: the subscale of Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II

Interventions

  • Behavioralthe subscale of Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II

    Nutritional health behavior included the following nine items: "choose a low-fat diet"; "limit the use of sugars"; "eat servings of bread, cereal, and rice"; "eat servings of fruit"; "eat servings of vegetables"; "eat servings of meat, poultry, fish, dietary guidelines

    Also known as: Occupational Physical activity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Metabolic Syndrome no. among each group

    MetS was defined according to International Diabetes Federation criteria as: central obesity (defined as waist circumference 90 cm for men and 80 cm for women, plus any two of the following four factors: Raised TG level (150 mg/dl or on treatment for lipid abnormality), reduced HDL cholesterol (¼90 cm for men and \>¼80 cm for women and any two of the following four factors: triglycerides \>¼150 mg/ dl, reduced HDL cholesterol (\<40 mg/dl in men and \<50 mg/dl in women or on treatment for lipid abnormality), raised blood pressure (systolic blood pressure 130 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 85 mm Hg or on treatment for hypertension),raised fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (FPG100 mg/dl or on treatment for diabetes).

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression

  2. Nutritional health behavior

    nutritional health behavior was obtained using the subscale of Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Nutritional health behavior included the following nine items: "choose a low-fat diet"; "limit the use of sugars"; "eat servings of bread, cereal, and rice"; "eat servings of fruit"; "eat servings of vegetables"; "eat servings of meat, poultry, fish, dried beans, eggs and nuts"; "eat servings of milk, yogurt or cheese"; "read labels to identify nutrients"; and "eat breakfast." The number of daily servings for each food group was set according to the dietary guidelines, Participants were asked to rate nine items on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (routinely). A higher mean score indicated a greater level of participation in nutritional health behavior.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression

Secondary outcomes

  1. blood sample for Complete blood picture

    5 ml of blood to measure WBCs derangement

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang JH, Li RH, Huang SL, Sia HK, Lee SS, Wang WH, Tang FC. Relationships between different types of physical activity and metabolic syndrome among Taiwanese workers. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 23;7(1):13735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13872-5. PubMed 29061986 ↗
  • Hidaka T, Hayakawa T, Kakamu T, Kumagai T, Hiruta Y, Hata J, Tsuji M, Fukushima T. Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components among Japanese Workers by Clustered Business Category. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 15;11(4):e0153368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153368. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27082961 ↗
  • Jeong HS. The Relationship between Workplace Environment and Metabolic Syndrome. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Oct;9(4):176-183. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2018.1346. PubMed 30325358 ↗
  • Clementi EA, Talusan A, Vaidyanathan S, Veerappan A, Mikhail M, Ostrofsky D, Crowley G, Kim JS, Kwon S, Nolan A. Metabolic Syndrome and Air Pollution: A Narrative Review of Their Cardiopulmonary Effects. Toxics. 2019 Jan 30;7(1):6. doi: 10.3390/toxics7010006. PubMed 30704059 ↗
  • Mini GK, Sarma PS, Thankappan KR. Overweight, the major determinant of metabolic syndrome among industrial workers in Kerala, India: Results of a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Sep-Oct;13(5):3025-3030. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 17. PubMed 30033228 ↗
  • Sajid Jabbar A, Ali ET. Impact of Petroleum Exposure on Some Hematological Indices, Interleukin-6, and Inflammatory Markers of Workers at Petroleum Stations in Basra City. J Environ Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;2020:7693891. doi: 10.1155/2020/7693891. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32831856 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04815538
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mariam Roshdy Elkhayat (lecturer, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 25, 2021
Start date
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 26, 2021

Study contacts

Mariam R Elkhayat, lecturer
Contact
mariam.elkhayat@aun.edu.eg
+20 00201003708261
Mai kamal, lecturer
Contact
mai_heamatology@aun.edu.eg
0 122 397 1678
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion