CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04813133Updated Nov 20, 2024

Role of Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program in Insulin Dependent Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients

An interventional study of Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Physiotherapy in Diabetic Neuropathies, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
216
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine the role of Synchronized Lifestyle modification program along with Physiotherapy on the symptoms of DPN in patients on insulin therapy.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder which influence about 8.3% of adult population and is the fifth major cause of death globally. In Pakistan, prevalence of type 2 diabetes is 16.98% according to recent survey held in 2019. DM is classified into type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, there is an absolute deficiency of insulin secretion due to an autoimmune pathologic process occurring in beta islets of pancreas. While Type 2 diabetes is characterized by a combination of insulin resistance and inadequate insulin secretion with resultant hyperglycemia leading to micro and macrovascular complications. Macrovascular complications include cardiovascular disease, stroke and peripheral artery disease. Amongst microvascular complications, Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common complication in both developed and developing countries. DPN is a symmetrical, length-dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathy which is attributed to metabolic and micro vessel alterations due to hyperglycemia and concomitant cardiovascular risk covariates. Major risk factors for development of DPN include duration of diabetes, hyperglycemia, and age, followed by prediabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. DPN can engender disablement in touch sensation, vibration sense, lower limb proprioception, and kinesthesia thus contributing to impaired balance, altered gait with increased risk of falling. DPN occurs in more than 50% of people with type 2 diabetes. It is a salient risk factor for skin breakdown, amputation, and reduced physical mobility consequently lowering the quality of life Management of DPN is multifaceted and includes efforts to alter the natural history (lifestyle changes) and symptomatic treatments through pharmacological interventions. Daily habits and actions exert an enormous influence on short-term and long-term health and quality of life. Importance of dietary modification is enhanced if it is synchronized with the circadian rhythm of the body. Therefore, Synchronized Lifestyle modification program is a personalized, homeostasis restoring, liver centric lifestyle modification program that works through the correction of body clock rhythm. Lifestyle medicine comprises of cluster of positive lifestyle practices including maintenance of a healthy body weight, regular physical activity, cessation of cigarette smoking, stress reduction as well following a few nutritional practices such as increasing whole grains and consuming more fruits and vegetables. Lifestyle modification, including diet and exercise, slow the progression of neuropathy by promoting small nerve fiber regeneration. Dietary modifications include intake of nutrient, such as whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, low-fat dairy, lean meats, nuts, and seeds. These foods help to maintain body weight, attain individualized glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid goals and prevent complications of diabetes. Exercise improves three of the biggest risk factors for diabetic neuropathy including insulin sensitivity and glucose control, obesity, and dyslipidemia. These exercises include aerobic exercise that improves glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in diabetics. Strength training exercise improves postural sway during standing, and gait characteristics during level-ground walking. While the flexibility exercise are suggested for refining distal joint mobility and plantar pressure distribution during gait. Thus, Exercise is known to enhance multiple metabolic factors that may affect nerve health and microvascular function, which may indirectly protect against peripheral nerve damage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathies

Keywords

  • Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program
  • Diabetic Neuropathy
  • Insulin
03

In context

Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 216 is above the median of 60 across 768 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Peripheral Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Both males and females
  2. Five years duration of clinically diagnosed type 2 Diabetes were included in the study
  3. On insulin therapy
  4. Diagnosed to have peripheral neuropathy according to Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument with a physical examination score > 2.5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Type 1 Diabetics
  2. Type 2 Diabetics
  3. On oral hypoglycemic and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 analogues, patients having neuropathies due to other causes (Vitamin B₁₂ deficiency, Drug and Alcohol abuse), patients with other co-morbidities (Renal insufficiency, Heart, Liver and Eye diseases)
  4. Patients with foot ulcers and orthopedic or surgical problems of lower limb
  5. Patients with peripheral vascular diseases, inability to walk independently
  6. Patients receiving any structured supervised physiotherapy intervention
  7. Pregnant females were excluded from the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
216 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program

    Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program

    Other: Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program

  • Experimental
    Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Physiotherapy

    Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Physiotherapy

    Other: Synchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Physiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Physiotherapy

    Physiotherapy included Aerobics, Resistance exercise, Flexibility exercise, and Balance exercise.

    Other: Physiotherapy

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    No intervention will be given to this Group

Interventions

  • OtherSynchronized Lifestyle Modification Program

    Synchronization of dietary intake with circadian rhythm of the body.

  • OtherSynchronized Lifestyle Modification Program and Physiotherapy

    Synchronization of dietary intake with circadian rhythm of the body along with Physiotherapy ( Aerobics, flexibility, resistance and balance exercises.)

  • OtherPhysiotherapy

    Only Physiotherapy training which includes ( Aerobics, flexibility, resistance and balance exercises.)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lifestyle pattern assessment

    Changes from baseline assessed through a self structured questionnaire consisted of open ended questions to assess the timing and type of food taken in meals, daily water intake and sleeping habits. Total 10 questions are included.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Calculation of Body Mass Index

    Changes from baseline calculated by measuring height through metal measuring tape in meters and weight in kilograms through potable manual weighing scale. BMI with minimum value of 18.5 and maximum value of 24.5 Kilogram/ square meter. Below 18.5 is considered as underweight and above 24.9 is considered as obese

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Measurement of Systolic Blood Pressure

    Changes from baseline are assessed by using Mercury Sphygmomanometer with minimum value of 110 millimeter of Mercury and maximum value of 130 millimeter of Mercury. Below 110 millimeter of Mercury is considered as low systolic pressure and above 130 millimeter of Mercury is considered as high systolic pressure

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Measurement of Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Changes from baseline are assessed by using Mercury Sphygmomanometer with minimum value of 60 millimeter of Mercury and maximum value of 90 millimeter of Mercury. Below 60 millimeter of Mercury is considered as low diastolic pressure and above 90 millimeter of Mercury is considered as high diastolic pressure

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Assessment of Presence and Severity of Neuropathy by Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) that consists of a history questionnaire comprising of 15 questions related to symptoms of diabetic neuropathy with a score of \>7 is considered as abnormal and Physical examination that consists of inspection of foot for deformities, ulcers and callus formation, Ankle reflex and vibration sensation with a score of \>2.5 is considered abnormal

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Measurement of Peak Latency of Sensory Nerves of lower extremities (Sural and Peroneal)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with a maximum value of 4.2 millisecond for sural nerve and 6.1 milliseconds for peroneal nerve are considered normal. Values below 4.2 and 6.1 milliseconds are considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Measurement of Amplitude of Sensory Nerves of lower extremities (Sural and Peroneal)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with a value of 2 microvolts for peroneal nerve and 6 microvolts for sural nerve are considered normal. Values below 2 and 6 microvolts were considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Velocity of Sensory Nerves of lower extremities (Sural and Peroneal)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with minimum limit of 44 meters /second and maximum limit of 64 meters/second. Value below 44m/sec and above 64m/sec are considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Onset Latency of Motor Nerves (Peroneal and Tibial)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with a value of 6.1 milliseconds for both nerves is considered normal. Value below 6.1 milliseconds is considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Amplitude of Motor Nerves (Peroneal and Tibial)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with a value of 2 millivolts for peroneal nerve and 3 millivolts for tibial nerve is considered normal. Value below 2 and 3 microvolts is considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Velocity of Motor Nerves (Peroneal and Tibial)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Nerve Conduction Studies with a value of 41 m/sec is considered normal. Value below 41 m/sec is considered abnormal

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  12. Assessment of Balance by Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Changes from baseline are assessed by Berg Balance Scale (BBS) with Low Fall Risk score of 41-56, Medium Fall Risk 21-40, High Fall Risk 0-20

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  13. Fasting Blood Glucose

    Changes from baseline are measured by glucose oxidase strip method in milligram/deciliter using glucometer with a minimum value of 72 mg/dL and a maximum value of 99mg/dL is considered normal. Value below 72mg/dL is considered as hypoglycemia and value above 99 mg/dL is considered hyperglycemia.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  14. Serum HbA1c concentration

    Changes from baseline are measured by Ion Exchange Chromatography with a minimum value of 4% and maximum value of 5.9% is considered normal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  15. Serum Triglycerides

    Changes from baseline are measured by Glycerol Phosphate Enzyme Based Method with a minimum value of 150 milligram /deciliter and a maximum value of 199 milligram/deciliter is considered normal. Value above 200 milligram/deciliter is considered as increased serum triglycerides

    Time frame: 12 week

  16. Serum Total Cholesterol

    Changes from baseline are measured by Cholesterol Oxidase Enzyme Based Method with a minimum value of 125 and a maximum value of 200 milligram /deciliters considered as normal. Value above 200 milligram/deciliter is considered as hypercholesterolemia.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  17. Serum Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL)

    Changes from baseline are measured by Friedewald calculation with a minimum value of 100 and a maximum value of 120 milligram /deciliter is considered as normal.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  18. Serum High Density Lipoproteins (HDL)

    Changes from baseline are measured by Direct Enzymatic Immuno-inhibition with a maximum value of 40milligram/deciliter and higher is considered as normal. Value below 40 milligram/deciliter is considered as abnormal.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pakistan Railway Hospital, Islamabad
    Islamabad, Federal 44000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Domingueti CP, Dusse LM, Carvalho Md, de Sousa LP, Gomes KB, Fernandes AP. Diabetes mellitus: The linkage between oxidative stress, inflammation, hypercoagulability and vascular complications. J Diabetes Complications. 2016 May-Jun;30(4):738-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.12.018. Epub 2015 Dec 18. PubMed 26781070 ↗
  • Aamir AH, Ul-Haq Z, Mahar SA, Qureshi FM, Ahmad I, Jawa A, Sheikh A, Raza A, Fazid S, Jadoon Z, Ishtiaq O, Safdar N, Afridi H, Heald AH. Diabetes Prevalence Survey of Pakistan (DPS-PAK): prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes using HbA1c: a population-based survey from Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 21;9(2):e025300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025300. PubMed 30796126 ↗
  • Diabetes DOF. DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION OF DIABETES OTHER CATEGORIES OF GLUCOSE. 2010;33.
  • Lilly E, Homburg B. P R O G R E S S I O N , Initiating Insulin Therapy in Type 2. 2009;32:0-5.
  • Majeedkutty NA, Jabbar MA. Physical Therapy for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy : A Narrative Review. 30(1):112-25.
  • Alam U, Riley DR, Jugdey RS, Azmi S, Rajbhandari S, D'Aout K, Malik RA. Diabetic Neuropathy and Gait: A Review. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Dec;8(6):1253-1264. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0295-y. Epub 2017 Sep 1. PubMed 28864841 ↗
  • Papanas N, Ziegler D. Risk Factors and Comorbidities in Diabetic Neuropathy: An Update 2015. Rev Diabet Stud. 2015 Spring-Summer;12(1-2):48-62. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2015.12.48. Epub 2015 Aug 10. PubMed 26676661 ↗
  • Kluding PM, Bareiss SK, Hastings M, Marcus RL, Sinacore DR, Mueller MJ. Physical Training and Activity in People With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Paradigm Shift. Phys Ther. 2017 Jan 1;97(1):31-43. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20160124. PubMed 27445060 ↗
  • Education DS. 4 . Lifestyle Management. 2017;40(January):33-43.
  • Nadi M, Marandi SM, Esfarjani F, Saleki M, Mohammadi M. The Comparison between Effects of 12 weeks Combined Training and Vitamin D Supplement on Improvement of Sensory-motor Neuropathy in type 2 Diabetic Women. Adv Biomed Res. 2017 May 2;6:55. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.205528. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28553628 ↗
  • Handsaker JC, Brown SJ, Bowling FL, Maganaris CN, Boulton AJ, Reeves ND. Resistance exercise training increases lower limb speed of strength generation during stair ascent and descent in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabet Med. 2016 Jan;33(1):97-104. doi: 10.1111/dme.12841. Epub 2015 Jul 17. PubMed 26108438 ↗
  • Andayani TM, Izham M, Ibrahim M, Asdie AH. Comparison of the glycemic control of insulin and triple oral therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2010;1(April):13-8.
  • Rahimi N, Samavati Sharif MA, Goharian AR, Pour AH. The Effects of Aerobic Exercises and 25(OH) D Supplementation on GLP1 and DPP4 Level in Type II Diabetic Patients. Int J Prev Med. 2017 Aug 8;8:56. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_161_17. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28900535 ↗
  • DE BODO RC, ALTSZULER N, DUNN A, STEELE R, ARMSTRONG DT, BISHOP JS. Effects of exogenous and endogenous insulin on glucose utilization and production. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959 Sep 25;82:431-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb44924.x. No abstract available. PubMed 13814676 ↗
  • Donnor T, Sarkar S. Insulin- Pharmacology, Therapeutic Regimens and Principles of Intensive Insulin Therapy. 2023 Feb 15. In: Feingold KR, Ahmed SF, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E, de Herder WW, Dhatariya K, Dungan K, Hofland J, Kalra S, Kaltsas G, Kapoor N, Koch C, Kopp P, Korbonits M, Kovacs CS, Kuohung W, Laferrere B, Levy M, McGee EA, McLachlan R, Muzumdar R, Purnell J, Rey R, Sahay R, Shah AS, Singer F, Sperling MA, Stratakis CA, Trence DL, Wilson DP, editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278938/ PubMed 25905175 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04813133
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2021
Start date
Feb 5, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2022
Completion
Jan 30, 2022
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Shazia Ali, PhD
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion