CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04767191Kenya-TESUpdated Nov 1, 2023

Malaria Therapeutic Efficacy Study (TES) Kenya

A Phase 4 interventional study of artemether lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin piperaquine in Uncomplicated Malaria, sponsored by Jhpiego. Completed at 2 sites in Kenya. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-01.

Sponsored by Jhpiego · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. In line with this WHO recommendation, Kenya Ministry of Health (MOH) is conducting the TES to determine the efficacy of artemether lumefantrine (AL), and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP), the first and second line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Kenya. The objective of this study is to inform the decisions or actions made by a public health authority (Kenya Ministry of Health) to inform decision on revision of the antimalarial guidelines and policy in Kenya. Jhpiego's Impact Malaria project in Kenya, with funding and technical oversight from US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) through USAID and CDC, will support the Kenya MOH in its effort to evaluate the efficacy of AL and DHP in the treatment of children with uncomplicated malaria. The study is being conducted by Kenya MOH, with technical support and funding by PMI-USAID through Jhpiego in Kenya.

Read the detailed description

WHO recommends that Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) for 1st and 2nd line antimalarial medicines should be routinely carried out and data made available for decision-making due to the threat of emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance in malaria-endemic countries, especially in Africa. In its strategy to strengthen malaria surveillance, Kenya's Ministry of Health (MOH) National Malaria Program (NMP) planned to conduct TES every three years to ascertain continuing efficacy of the first and second-line treatments. The last TES for 1st line treatment of malaria in Kenya was done in Siaya county in 2016. In line with the WHO recommendation, Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Kenya, with funding and technical oversight from Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) will be supporting the Kenya MOH NMP to conduct a TES to assess the efficacy of the current first and second line treatment policy in Kenya. The study is being conducted by Kenya MOH NMP, with technical oversight and funding by CDC through the Jhpiego Impact Malaria project in Kenya.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of Artemether Lumefantrine (AL) and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine (DHP) for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria infections.

Study Sites: One site will be selected in Siaya county and one site will be selected in Bungoma county (Kimilili Sub-County). Both sites will be Level-2 facilities (health centers) with high outpatient department attendance of patients with malaria. At each site, there will be two study arms: one arm for AL and one arm for DHP.

Study Period: March 2021 to September 2021

Study Design: This surveillance study is a two-arm prospective study Patient population: Febrile patients aged between 6 months and 59 months, with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum monoinfection.

Sample Size: At each site, at least 100 patients will be enrolled per drug (200 patients per site, 400 patients total).

Treatment(s) and follow-up: Clinical and parasitological parameters will be monitored over a 28-day follow-up period to evaluate AL efficacy, and over a 42-day follow-up period to evaluate DHP efficacy.

Primary endpoints: The proportion of patients with early treatment failure, late clinical failure, late parasitological failure or an adequate clinical and parasitological response as indicators of efficacy. Recrudescence will be distinguished from re-infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

Secondary endpoints: The frequency and nature of adverse events.

Exploratory endpoints: to determine the polymorphism of molecular markers of drug resistance and evasion of diagnostic testing; to determine the blood concentration of AL

02

Conditions studied

  • Uncomplicated Malaria

Browse trials for

03

In context

Malaria

1,299 studies on the registry are indexed under Malaria; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 220 across 1,027 interventional studies indexed under Malaria.

Browse Malaria studies →

Lead sponsor

Jhpiego is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age between 6 months to 59 months; mono-infection with P. falciparum confirmed by positive blood smear (i.e. no mixed infection);
  • parasitaemia of 1,000 - 100,000/µl asexual forms;
  • presence of axillary temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or history of fever during the past 24 h;
  • ability to swallow oral medication;
  • haemoglobin ≥5.0 g/dL at admission;
  • informed consent from a parent or guardian;
  • parent/guardian agrees to bring the patient for planned follow-up visits at day 7, 14, 21, and 28

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • general danger signs or signs of severe falciparum malaria according to the definitions of WHO;
  • severe malnutrition according to WHO child growth standards (WHO, 2006), children with marasmus or oedematous malnutrition;
  • mixed or mono-infection with another Plasmodium species detected by microscopy;
  • presence of febrile conditions due to diseases other than malaria (e.g. measles, acute lower respiratory tract infection, severe diarrhea with dehydration) or other known underlying chronic or severe diseases (e.g. cardiac, renal and hepatic diseases, HIV/AIDS);
  • regular medication, which may interfere with antimalarial pharmacokinetics;
  • history of hypersensitivity reactions or contraindications to any of the medicine(s) being tested or used as alternative treatment(s);
  • history of receiving any antimalarial treatment in the preceding 72 hours;. exposure to malaria vaccine
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    artemether lumefantrine

    The drug is approved and in use by the Kenya Ministry of Health as the 1st line treatment for malaria. The study is to assess the continued efficacy of the drug.

    Drug: artemether lumefantrine

  • Active comparator
    dihydroartemisinin piperaquine

    The drug is approved and in use by the Kenya Ministry of Health as the 2nd line treatment for malaria. The study is to assess the continued efficacy of the drug.

    Drug: dihydroartemisinin piperaquine

Interventions

  • Drugartemether lumefantrine

    The drugs are approved and in use by the Kenya Ministry of Health as the 1st and 2nd line treatment for malaria. The study is to assess the continued efficacy of the two drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria.

  • Drugdihydroartemisinin piperaquine

    Antimalarial Combinations

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients (in the Artemether Lumefantrine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test.

    Time frame: By day 28 post-treatment

  2. Number of patients (in the Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine arm) with clinical and parasitological cure (i.e. free of malaria symptoms and parasites) assessed clinically and via microscopy and rapid diagnostic test.

    Time frame: By day 42 post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients (in the Artemether Lumefantrine arm arm) with treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: by day 28 post-treatment

  2. Number of patients (in the Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine arm) with treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: by day 42 post-treatment

  3. Number of patients (in the Artemether Lumefantrine arm) with molecular markers of drug resistance assessed via phenotype test

    Time frame: by day 28 post-treatment

  4. Number of patients (in the Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine arm) with molecular markers of drug resistance assessed via phenotype test

    Time frame: by day 42 post-treatment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Makhonge Health Centre
    Bungoma, Bungoma County, Kenya
  • Kaluo Health Centre
    Siaya, Siaya County, Kenya
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04767191
Lead sponsor
Jhpiego
Collaborators
Kenya Ministry of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2021
Start date
Mar 15, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2022
Completion
Dec 18, 2022
Last update
Nov 1, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion