ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04763564Updated Jul 23, 2024Results posted

Efficacy of Liraglutide Therapy in Patients With IPAA

A Phase 2 interventional study of Liraglutide Pen Injector and Placebo Pen Injector in Pouchitis and Irritable Pouch Syndrome, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to an interruption in drug supply, the study was terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis(IPAA; pouch) due to refractory inflammatory bowel disease and increased bowel frequency in the absence of significant pouch inflammation will be randomized to liraglutide or placebo in a prospective cross over study.

Read the detailed description

Randomized, double-blind, 2-period, placebo- controlled, crossover proof of concept study.

Ten patients with increased bowel frequency defined as bowel frequency > 8 bowel movements in 24 hours on at least 4 of 7 days/week and presence of high bowel frequency > 4 weeks despite adequate therapy for acute pouchitis or Crohn's like disease of the pouch will be randomized to either liraglutide or placebo treatment for 6 weeks (Period 1). Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to 1 of 2 treatment sequences, liraglutide-placebo or placebo-liraglutide, and receive either liraglutide or volume-matched placebo. After a wash-out period of at least 5 days (the half-life of liraglutide is 11-12 hours, thus the minimal washout period of 5 days is equal to 10 half-life's) patients will be crossed over to the other treatment arm (Period 2). Since high bowel frequency can result in significant malaise and dehydration, patients not responding to the respective therapies in period 1 may be crossed over after 4 weeks of therapy or in period 2 can be terminated early at week 4. The rationale behind the early termination is based on 2 open-label cohorts reporting the efficacy of liraglutide or exenatide in patients with high output ileostomies (the patient group the most comparable to the pouch patient population). Glucagon-like peptide- 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist therapy even at the lowest dose showed an almost immediate effect reducing the ostomy output after 1-3 days in most patients.Thus, patients not responding to a 4-week therapy with a GLP-1receptor agonist are highly unlikely to respond if the therapy would be continued.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pouchitis
  • Irritable Pouch Syndrome

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pouchitis

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Pouchitis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 20 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Pouchitis.

Browse Pouchitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • will be obtained before any trial-related procedures
  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients with IPAA and bowel frequency > 8 bowel movements in 24 hours on at least 4 of 7 days/week and presence of high bowel frequency > 4 weeks despite adequate therapy for acute pouchitis or Crohn's like disease of the pouch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant pouch inflammation defined as an endoscopic pouch disease activity index (PDAI ) ≥ 4
  • Known stricture of the ileo-anal anastomosis or afferent limb stricture
  • New onset of high bowel frequency in the setting of acute pouchitis
  • IPAA since \< 6 months
  • Known Clostridium difficile pouchitis
  • Known chronic nausea and/or vomiting in the past
  • Known type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • History of or active neoplasia
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2
  • Renal impairment defined as (glomerular filtration rate \< 30)
  • Clinically significant decompensated liver disease defined as elevation of , alanine transaminase or > 2-fold the (Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis with liver function tests (LFT's) \<1.5 upper limits of normal can be included)
  • class 3 or greater heart failure or recent (within 6 months) cardiovascular event
  • Prior history of pancreatitis
  • Prior treatment with a GLP-1receptor agonist
  • Known to liraglutide or any product components
  • Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of and not using a highly effective method.
  • Participation in any clinical trial of an approved or non-approved medicinal product within 30 days before screening.
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardize patient's safety or compliance with the protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liraglutide then Placebo

    Participants will be randomly assigned to 6-week Liraglutide treatment. Then after a 5-day washout, treatment will continue with 6 weeks of placebo.

    Drug: Liraglutide Pen Injector · Drug: Placebo Pen Injector

  • Experimental
    Placebo then Liraglutide

    Participants will be randomly assigned to 6-week placebo treatment. Then after a 5-day washout, treatment will continue with 6 weeks of Liraglutide.

    Drug: Liraglutide Pen Injector · Drug: Placebo Pen Injector

Interventions

  • Treatment will be initiated at 0.6 mg per day for one week. The patient will be instructed to increase the dose to 1.2/day and 1.8 mg /day in week 2 and in week 3, respectively. From week 3 after the start of the drug until week 6 the patient will apply 1.8 mg/day liraglutide. In case of intolerance (e.g. occurrence of refractory nausea) at a higher dose (e.g. 1.8 mg daily, the highest dose in this trial) liraglutide can be reduced to the previous level.

    Also known as: Victoza

  • DrugPlacebo Pen Injector

    Matching placebo pens used to administer normal saline in the same fashion as for liraglutide

    Also known as: Saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .

    Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 4 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 4 and treatment period 2 at week 10 vs baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 (treatment period 1) and week 10 (treatment period 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs Placebo

    Bowel frequency during the day and night was recorded on a daily basis. The 7-day mean number of bowel movements during the day (from getting up until bedtime) and during the night (during sleep) at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 on liraglutide or placebo therapy is depicted. Baseline, week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)

  2. Discontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm

    Number of patients discontinuing Liraglutide therapy in treatment or placebo arm due to intolerance in treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12

    Time frame: treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12

  3. Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.

    Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 6 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 6 or treatment period 2 at week 12 vs baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 12 (treatment period 2)

07

Results

Posted Jul 23, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Small cross-over proof of concept study. The findings need to be verified in a more extensive prospective randomized study.

Participant flow

Due to an interruption in drug supply, the study was terminated after 8 of 10 patients were included.

First Intervention
Participant flow — First Intervention
MilestoneLiraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Liraglutide
Started35
Completed35
Not completed00
Washout
Participant flow — Washout
MilestoneLiraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Liraglutide
Started35
Completed35
Not completed00
Second Intervention
Participant flow — Second Intervention
MilestoneLiraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Liraglutide
Started35
Completed35
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .

Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 4 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 4 and treatment period 2 at week 10 vs baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4 (treatment period 1) and week 10 (treatment period 2)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage reduction of bowel frequency
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .
percentage reduction of bowel frequencyLiraglutidePlacebo
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 4 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline .36.3 ± 19.817.3 ± 15.7
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.03 (A priori threshold for significance was \< 0.05. Significance level liraglutide vs. placebo in percent reduction of bowel frequency at week 4 vs. baseline.)
SecondaryChange in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs Placebo

Bowel frequency during the day and night was recorded on a daily basis. The 7-day mean number of bowel movements during the day (from getting up until bedtime) and during the night (during sleep) at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 on liraglutide or placebo therapy is depicted. Baseline, week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4 and week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 10 and week 12 (treatment period 2)
Reported as:
Mean · Bowel movements / day or night
Change in the 7 Day Mean Number of Day and Night Bowel Frequency at Week 4 and 6 vs Baseline on Liraglutide vs Placebo
Bowel movements / day or nightLiraglutidePlacebo
Baseline Bowel Frequency Day8.8 ± 2.38.8 ± 2.3
Baseline Bowel Frequency Night3.3 ± 1.78.8 ± 2.3
Week 4 Day5.3 ± 2.26.9 ± 2.2
Week 4 Night2.3 ± 1.13.1 ± 1.6
Week 6 Day5.4 ± 1.97.0 ± 2.0
Week 6 Night Placebo week 62.1 ± 1.03.1 ± 1.8
SecondaryDiscontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm

Number of patients discontinuing Liraglutide therapy in treatment or placebo arm due to intolerance in treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12

Time frame:
treatment period 1 before week 6 or treatment period 2 before week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Discontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm
ParticipantsLiraglutidePlacebo
Discontinuation of Therapy in Each Treatment Arm00
SecondaryMean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.

Mean percentage reduction of 7-day bowel frequency after 6 weeks of therapy on Liraglutide vs placebo compared to baseline (baseline is defined as the mean 7-day bowel frequency in a 7-day period during the screening period before week 0). Due to the cross-over design, the outcome is reported depending on randomization in treatment period 1 at week 6 or treatment period 2 at week 12 vs baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, week 6 (treatment period 1) and week 12 (treatment period 2)
Reported as:
Mean · Percent reduction of bowel frequency
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.
Percent reduction of bowel frequencyLiraglutidePlacebo
Mean % Reduction of Bowel Frequency in Percent of the Mean 7-day Bowel Frequency After 6 Weeks of Therapy on Liraglutide vs Placebo Compared to Baseline.36.8 ± 18.715.7 ± 5.3
Statistical analysis
  • Liraglutide vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01

Adverse events

Collected over The adverse events were collected from each study participant from the screening visit until the last study visit at week 14. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Liraglutide0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)8/8 (100%)
Placebo0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)6/8 (75%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventLiraglutidePlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/82/8
Diarrhea (intermittent)Gastrointestinal disorders4/82/8
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/82/8
FatigueGeneral disorders2/81/8
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders2/81/8
Hypoglycemic episodeMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/82/8
Acid refluxGastrointestinal disorders1/81/8
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders1/81/8
Joint painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/81/8
Hair lossGeneral disorders1/80/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years358
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
Mean49 (42 to 55)52 (44 to 65)51 (42 to 65)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
Female246
Male112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White358
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
United States358
Daily bowel frequency
Daily bowel frequency(bowel movements/day)Liraglutide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LiraglutideTotal
Mean10.9 ± 2.112.8 ± 2.012.1 ± 3.1
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Herfarth H, Long MD, Hansen JJ, Anderson C, English E, Buse JB, Barnes EL. Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Patients With an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis and Chronic High Bowel Frequency: A Placebo-Controlled, Crossover, Proof-of-Concept Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 1;119(9):1935-1938. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002801. Epub 2024 Apr 12. PubMed 38668926 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 3 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina [UNC].

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04763564
Collaborators
Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2021
Start date
Mar 22, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2023
Completion
Oct 16, 2023
Results posted
Jul 23, 2024
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Hans Herfarth, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Liraglutide

Start the discussion