ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04757233Updated Dec 12, 2024

Personalizing Self-management in Diabetes - Pilot Study

An interventional study of GlucoType in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-12.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2018, registered Dec 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to conduct a pilot feasibility study a novel informatics intervention, GlucoType (also called Platano for Latino users) that incorporates computational analysis of self-monitoring data to help individuals with type 2 diabetes personalize diabetes self-management strategies. This study will include 20 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) recruited from economically disadvantaged and medically underserved communities to test Platano for 4 weeks to assess its acceptability and feasibility. The main outcome measures include problem-solving abilities in diabetes (Diabetes Problem-Solving Inventory (DPSA)) and self-reported diabetes self-care (Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCA)). In addition, this study will include a controlled laboratory experiment to assess whether participants can understand and follow personalized nutritional goals generated by Platano.

Read the detailed description

Growing evidence highlights significant differences in individuals' physiology and glycemic function and their cultural, social, and economical circumstances that impact diabetes self-management. These discoveries paved the way for precision medicine-an approach to personalizing medical treatment to an individual's genetic makeup, clinical history, and lifestyle. Computational learning methods have been successfully used for identifying clinical phenotypes-observable manifestations of diseases. Studies showed the benefits of tailoring not only medical treatment, but also behavioral interventions; however, tailoring typically relies on expert identification of tailoring variables and decision rules, and on standard surveys. Data collected with self-monitoring can more accurately reflect an individual's behaviors and glycemic patterns, thus highlighting their "behavioral phenotypes", yet such data are rarely utilized in tailoring.

The ongoing focus of this research is on facilitating problem-solving in diabetes self-management. Well-developed problem-solving skills are essential to diabetes management result in better diabetes self-care behaviors lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and can be fostered with face-to-face interventions. Previous research suggested problem identification and generation of alternatives as critical steps in problem-solving in diabetes. In previous work, the investigators developed an informatics intervention that relied on expert-generated knowledge for assisting individuals on these steps of problem-solving. In this pilot feasibility study, the investigators study an alternative solution that relies on computational pattern analysis of data collected with self-monitoring technologies to tailor the problem-solving assistance to individuals' unique behavioral phenotypes. The intervention, GlucoType uses computational learning methods to identify systematic patterns in individuals' diet, physical activity, and sleep, captured with custom-built and commercial self-monitoring technologies, and correlates these patterns with fluctuations in individuals' blood glucose levels. GlucoType then uses this information to 1) identify behavioral patterns associated with high glycemic excursion, 2) formulate personalized goals to modify these behaviors, 3) provide in-the-moment decision support to help individuals be more consistent in meeting their goals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • GlucoType
  • Informatics
  • Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,589 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 81 across 7,713 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,135 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 179 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 146 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • A diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.
  • A participant of the Washington Heights/Inwood Informatics Infrastructure for Comparative Effectiveness Research (WICER), a patient of the AIM clinic, or a patient of a participating Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) health center for at least 6 months
  • Has participated in at least one diabetes education session at the participating site in the last 6 months
  • Proficient in either English or Spanish
  • Must own a basic cell phone

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of serious illness (e.g. cancer diagnosis with active treatment, advanced stage heart failure, multiple sclerosis)
  • Presence of cognitive impairment
  • Plans for leaving their healthcare provider in the next 12 months
  • Does not have a computer and/or Internet access
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single arm

    Intervention: GlucoType Single arm study; all participants assigned to use the intervention

    Behavioral: GlucoType

Interventions

  • BehavioralGlucoType

    GlucoType is an mobile Health intervention for facilitating self-management in T2DM built for iPhone and Android smartphones. GlucoType includes a custom-built interface for low-burden capture of diet and blood glucose (BG) levels and relies on a commercial activity tracker, FitBit, for capture of sleep and physical activity. It then applies computational phenotyping techniques to identify patterns of associations between daily activities and changes in BG levels. GlucoType uses an expert system developed by our research team to translate identified phenotypes into automatically-generated personalized behavioral goals for improving glycemic control formulated in natural language.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in score on Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCA)

    Change in score on Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCA) - 12-item with 5 sub-scales (diet, exercise, home blood glucose testing, foot care, smoking status). The respondent is asked how many days in the past week he/she performed the behavior (ranges from 0 to 7); higher scores indicates higher performance.

    Time frame: From Baseline to 4 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Clinical Directors Network
    New York, New York 10018, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, Ben-Yacov O, Lador D, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M, Suez J, Mahdi JA, Matot E, Malka G, Kosower N, Rein M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Dohnalova L, Pevsner-Fischer M, Bikovsky R, Halpern Z, Elinav E, Segal E. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell. 2015 Nov 19;163(5):1079-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001. PubMed 26590418 ↗
  • Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, Cox CE, Duker P, Edwards L, Fisher EB, Hanson L, Kent D, Kolb L, McLaughlin S, Orzeck E, Piette JD, Rhinehart AS, Rothman R, Sklaroff S, Tomky D, Youssef G; 2012 Standards Revision Task Force. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S100-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S100. No abstract available. PubMed 23264420 ↗
  • Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30. PubMed 25635347 ↗
  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009 [cited 2016 Jun 4]. (Springer Series in Statistics)
  • Liao KP, Cai T, Savova GK, Murphy SN, Karlson EW, Ananthakrishnan AN, Gainer VS, Shaw SY, Xia Z, Szolovits P, Churchill S, Kohane I. Development of phenotype algorithms using electronic medical records and incorporating natural language processing. BMJ. 2015 Apr 24;350:h1885. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1885. PubMed 25911572 ↗
  • Hripcsak G, Albers DJ. Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):117-21. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001145. Epub 2012 Sep 6. PubMed 22955496 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04757233
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2021
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2018
Completion
Apr 30, 2018
Last update
Dec 12, 2024

Study contacts

Olena Mamykina, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion