ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04755101CardNMH3Updated Apr 24, 2025

Efficacy of a Right-sided Ablation of the Anterior Ganglionated Plexus for Neurally Mediated Syncope

An interventional study of EPS, electro-anatomical mapping, ARGP ablation, and pharmacological evaluation. and EPS, electro-anatomical mapping, and pharmacological evaluation. in Syncope, Neurogenic and Syncope, sponsored by Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden. Recruiting at 3 sites in Belgium. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-24.

Sponsored by Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2021; still recruiting 5 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The third study on CardNM (CardNMH3 study) is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with a sham control group investigating the efficacy and safety of a computed tomography (CT)-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus to prevent recurrence of syncope in patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS).

The primary goal of the study is to determine whether a CT-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus safely reduces the risk of recurrent episodes of syncope in patients with a history of recurrent NMS.

Two-third of the patients will be randomized to the active arm and one-third to the control arm (sham).

The study procedure is described in the 'detailed description' and 'intervention description'.

Syncope burden, syncope occurrence and quality of life will be assessed by questionnaires at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. A 24-h rhythm registration will be performed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up to investigate the influence of the intervention on heart rate.

The effect of CardNM on blood pressure and on chronotropic sinus node function will be evaluated in 2 additional substudies. Patients enrolled in the blood-pressure substudy will undergo a 24-h blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Participants in the sinus node competence substudy will undergo a bicycle exercise test at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Investigators aim to achieve complete follow-up for 110 patients who meet the study enrollment criteria. If syncope-free survival (primary endpoint) is significantly different between the 2 arms after the enrollment of fewer than 110 patients (minimum 55 patients), enrollment into the trial will be prematurely stopped. The study may also be terminated prematurely if safety concerns occur.

Read the detailed description

The efficacy of therapeutic strategies mentioned in the guidelines for patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is limited. The first clinical study on cardiac denervation in humans was published in 2005. Derived from this first method, different approaches to cardioneuroablation (CNA) to treat NMS have been published. Such ablations are complex, bi-atrial, and extensive. Cardio-neuromodulation (CardNM) is a less extensive and right-sided approach to CNA, based on a tailored vagolysis of the sinoatrial node through partial ablation of the anterior right-ganglionated plexus. Evidence from a single-center, non-randomized, unblinded trial showed that CardNM was associated with a reduction in syncope burden exceeding 90%.

This third study on CardNM (CardNMH3 study) is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with a sham control group investigating the efficacy and safety of a computed tomography (CT)-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus to prevent recurrence of syncope in patients with neurally mediated syncope.

The primary goal of the study is to determine whether a CT-guided, right-sided ablation of the anterior ganglionated plexus safely reduces the risk of recurrent episodes of syncope in patients with a history of recurrent NMS.

Two-thirds of the patients will be randomized to the active arm and one-third to the control arm (sham).

In all patients, the endocardial site to potentially target during ablation will be annotated before the procedure by a target line (TL) on a computed tomographic image of the heart imported into the CARTO system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA), as detailed in the 'intervention description'.

The study procedure will be performed under general anesthesia according to a standardized protocol. In all patients, a diagnostic electrophysiology study (EPS) and electroanatomical mapping of the right atrium and the surrounding veins will be performed first. This image will be merged with the CT image and the TL will be visible. Randomization will be performed electronically at this stage of the procedure.

In patients assigned to the active arm, the TL will be targeted by ablation as detailed in the intervention description'.

The ablation procedure is considered complete when one of the following conditions is fulfilled:

  1. 10 radiofrequency applications have been delivered;
  2. After 5 radiofrequency applications, the P-P interval is \<70% of the baseline procedural P-P interval and remains >550 ms 5 min after the last radiofrequency application;
  3. ≥5 radiofrequency applications have been delivered and the operator estimates that no additional P-P interval shortening will be obtained by additional radiofrequency applications;
  4. 3 radiofrequency applications have been delivered and the P-P interval is \<550 ms after the last radiofrequency application and remains stable after 5 min of waiting.

In all patients, a pharmacological evaluation and new diagnostic EPS will be performed to further evaluate the sinus node and atrioventricular nodal intrinsic activity at the end of the procedure, either after the diagnostic part of the procedure in the sham group or after the ablation in the active arm.

Syncope burden, syncope occurrence and quality of life will be assessed by questionnaires completed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. A 24-h rhythm registration will be performed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up to investigate the influence of the intervention on heart rate.

The effect of CardNM on blood pressure and on chronotropic sinus node function will be evaluated in 2 additional substudies. Patients enrolled in the blood-pressure substudy will undergo a 24-h blood pressure monitoring at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Participants in the sinus node competence substudy will undergo a bicycle exercise test at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Investigators aim to achieve complete follow-up for 110 patients who meet the study enrollment criteria. If the syncope-free survival, the primary endpoint of the study, is significantly different between the 2 arms after the enrollment of fewer than 110 patients (minimum 55 patients), enrollment into the trial will be prematurely stopped. The study may also be terminated prematurely if safety concerns occur.

02

Conditions studied

  • Syncope, Neurogenic
  • Syncope

Keywords

  • cardioneuroablation
  • cardio-neuromodulation
  • ganglionated plexi
  • right-anterior ganglionated plexus
  • ablation
03

In context

Syncope, Vasovagal

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Syncope, Vasovagal; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 59 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Syncope, Vasovagal.

Browse Syncope, Vasovagal studies →

Lead sponsor

Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be in sinus rhythm and have ≥3 syncopes during the last 18 months* and a previous positive tilt table test (TTT) with a cardioinhibitory or mixed response (VASIS I, IIA or IIB classification).

    * syncopes occurring during TTT are not taken into account

  • Patients have a 'preserved cholinergic SN reserve', defined as ≥20% sinus heart rate increment during a pharmacological test with atropine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<14 years age
  • Any unstable medical condition, \<12 months
  • Inability to provide consent or undergo follow-up
  • Syncope due to a non-cardiac disease or due to an advanced neuropathy
  • Moderate to severe valvular or subvalvular aortic stenosis or mitral stenosis
  • Overt heart failure or \<45%
  • Current pregnancy
  • Chronotropic negative medications unless judged mandatory
  • 4 g amiodarone intake during the 2 months preceding enrollment
  • Alternating RBBB and LBBB, HV interval >70 ms
  • LBBB, bifascicular block (RBBB + LAHB, RBBB + LPHB)
  • PR interval permanently >240 ms
  • Pacemaker or automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator device
  • Permanent AF, PAF or electrical cardioversion during the last 6 months
  • Channelopathy
  • Tilt table test with VASIS III response or with VASIS II response and AV-Block
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Righ-sided ARGP ablation

    two-thirds of the patients will be randomized to procedural arm A: a diagnostic evaluation followed by cardio-neuromodulation (CardNM) and a pharmacological evaluation

    Procedure: EPS, electro-anatomical mapping, ARGP ablation, and pharmacological evaluation.

  • Sham comparator
    Placebo

    one-third of the patients will be randomized to procedural arm B: a diagnostic evaluation followed by a pharmacological evaluation.

    Procedure: EPS, electro-anatomical mapping, and pharmacological evaluation.

Interventions

  • ProcedureEPS, electro-anatomical mapping, ARGP ablation, and pharmacological evaluation.

    EPS and electro-anatomical mapping of the right atrium and the surrounding veins. A target line (TL) is traced at the posteroseptal side of the junction, between the right atrium and superior vena cava, facing the mid and caudal parts of the right superior pulmonary vein antrum on the right heart cavities on a CT image imported into the CARTO system. This map will be carefully merged with the CT image and the TL will be visible. Sequential ablations will be delivered along theTL until the procedure endpoint is reached. Pharmacological evaluation.

  • ProcedureEPS, electro-anatomical mapping, and pharmacological evaluation.

    EPS and electro-anatomical mapping of the right atrium and the surrounding veins. A target line (TL) is traced at the posteroseptal side of the junction, between the right atrium and superior vena cava, facing the mid and caudal parts of the right superior pulmonary vein antrum on the right heart cavities on a CT image imported into the CARTO system. This map will be carefully merged with the CT image and the TL will be visible. No ablation is performed (sham). Pharmacological evaluation.

    Also known as: EPS, electro-anatomical mapping, no ablation, and pharmacological evaluation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Syncope free survival

    The primary efficacy endpoint is the number of days elapsed from study procedure to first syncope recurrence or to study close-out.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first syncope recurrence, assessed up to 12-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Syncope burden

    Corrected cumulative number of syncope episodes

    Time frame: 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up.

  2. Number of beats with prespecified P-P intervals

    Mean number of beats with prespecified P-P intervals over 24-h

    Time frame: 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up.

  3. Heart rate variability

    Standard deviation of the average NN (SDNN)

    Time frame: 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up.

  4. Quality of life scale based on the questionnaire 'Impact of Syncope on Quality of Life (ISQL)

    Comparison of scores; higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up.

07

Study locations

2 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04755101
Lead sponsor
Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden
Collaborators
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, AZ Sint-Jan AV, Biosense Webster, Inc., Trium Clinical Consulting
Responsible party
Philippe Debruyne (Cardiologist, head of Electrophysiology and Research Departments, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 15, 2021
Start date
Mar 24, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2025

Study contacts

Philippe Debruyne, MD
Contact
philippe.debruyne@skynet.be
0032478229896
Philippe Debruyne, MD
principal investigator · Imeldaziekenhuis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion