An interventional study of Standard oxygen and Nasal high-flow in Acute Viral Bronchitis, Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Jens Bräunlich. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-31.
Sponsored by Jens Bräunlich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The study compares oxygen and NHF in patients with acute viral illness. The duration will be 72h. After them physiological parameters and the outcome will be evaluated.
268 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchitis; 26 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 120 across 184 interventional studies indexed under Bronchitis.
Browse Bronchitis studies →Jens Bräunlich is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will use standard oxygen via face mask of nasal prongs as usual care.
Device: Standard oxygen
Patients will use NHF instead of oxygen. Oxygen will be supplemented via the NHF flow.
Device: Nasal high-flow
COT describes the application of low-flow oxygen in any way (Hudson mask, nasal prongs,...).
Also known as: COT
F is combination of room air supplemented with oxygen can be better patients. This gas mixture will be provided to the patient with a specialized nasal prong.
Also known as: NHF
Rox index
(SpO2/FiO2)/RR = index without a unit, mean Rox-index in the two groups, comparison between the groups (significant differences), physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
Time frame: 72 hours
paCO2 in mmHg
physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
Time frame: 72 hours
pH
physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
Time frame: 72 hours
escalation of therapy
use of noninvasive ventilation, intubation, to assess differences between the two groups
Time frame: 72 hours
paO2 in mmHg
physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
Time frame: 72 hours
Plan to share: Yes — original/ raw data
Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jens Bräunlich