CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04747249COVIPACT 2Updated Jul 31, 2026Results posted

Psychological Care of Oncology Patients With Post-traumatic Stress in the Context of a COVID-19

An interventional study of Psychological support in Solid Carcinoma, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Covid19, sponsored by Centre Francois Baclesse. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-31.

Sponsored by Centre Francois Baclesse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns of the risk of infection may lead to fear, anxiety or psychological disorders that may become generalised and long-lasting, corresponding to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD generally occurs in circumstances such as terrorist attacks, hostage-taking, bombings, aggression, accidents... The current health crisis also represents an increased risk of PTSD.

After the first moments of stress, the illness becomes more diffuse: personality change (introverted/extraverted), sleep disorders, heart problems, hypervigilance reaction, agoraphobia, symptoms of reminiscence, irritability, decreased concentration, memory loss... In some people, PTSD can lead to more disabling problems such as (crowd) avoidance.

In order to help patients with PTSD, clinical psychology offers therapeutic approaches which, starting from a debriefing with the patient, provide supportive therapy which (i) reassures by providing information on the symptomatology, in order to play down the present state of mind, (ii) allows for the expression of what was experienced during the event, (iii) initiates a process of elaboration of the trauma through transference.

A previous study conducted at the François Baclesse Center during the first COVID-19 lockdown (April to June 2020), which included 735 patients, assessed the impact of the pandemic on cancer patients treated in day hospitals. That study found that 21% of patients met criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and 23% reported insomnia. Based on these findings, the present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted psychological intervention for patients with pandemic-related PTSD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Solid Carcinoma
  • Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Covid19
03

In context

Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

2,237 studies on the registry are indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; 553 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 70 across 1,856 interventional studies indexed under Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic.

Browse Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Francois Baclesse is the lead sponsor of 109 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient treated or followed up for a solid tumour at the François Baclesse Centre
  • Patient with a score suggesting moderate or high posttraumatic stress symptoms (IES-R score ≥ 24) related to the COVID-19 epidemic
  • The patient's state of health is compatible with the programme: psychological care for 6 months.
  • Information note signed by the patient
  • Any associated geographical, social or psychopathological conditions that might compromise the patient's ability to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with no symptoms suggestive of moderate or high post-traumatic stress (IES-R score \<24)
  • Patient deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • Patient already receiving psychological care
  • Patient whose diagnosis of the disease was made within one month prior to the proposal for participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Psychological support

    Monthly psychological support

    Other: Psychological support

Interventions

  • OtherPsychological support

    Psychological care will be based on a monthly interview lasting approximately 45 minutes for 6 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With Improvement in Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms

    Improvement in post-traumatic stress symptoms observed during or at the end of the intervention, defined as a decrease below the threshold of 24 on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) compared with baseline. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report questionnaire assessing post-traumatic stress symptoms across intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal domains, with total scores ranging from 0 to 88 and higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Resilience Scores

    Done with Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a self-report questionnaire (commonly 25 items) assessing resilience, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating greater resilience.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePsychological Support
Started29
Completed22
Not completed7
Withdrew: Death2
Withdrew: Patient's decision5

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of Patients With Improvement in Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms

Improvement in post-traumatic stress symptoms observed during or at the end of the intervention, defined as a decrease below the threshold of 24 on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) compared with baseline. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report questionnaire assessing post-traumatic stress symptoms across intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal domains, with total scores ranging from 0 to 88 and higher scores indicating higher symptom severity.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Patients With Improvement in Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
ParticipantsPsychological Support
Proportion of Patients With Improvement in Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms12
SecondaryResilience Scores

Done with Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a self-report questionnaire (commonly 25 items) assessing resilience, with total scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating greater resilience.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · Score range 0 to 100
Resilience Scores
Score range 0 to 100Psychological Support
Resilience Scores62 (18 to 93)

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Psychological Support2/29 (6.9%)——

Baseline characteristics

All patients included were described at baseline

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Psychological Support
Median62 (39 to 80)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Psychological Support
Female26
Male3
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Psychological Support
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre Francois Baclesse
    Caen, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 24, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04747249
Lead sponsor
Centre Francois Baclesse
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 10, 2021
Start date
Jun 18, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2022
Completion
Sep 5, 2022
Results posted
Jun 24, 2026
Last update
Jul 31, 2026

Study contacts

Antony NARAYANASSAMY, M
principal investigator · Centre François Baclesse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion