ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06553612AFTERGYN2Updated Sep 24, 2026

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Assessment in Day Hospitalization Versus Standard Care on the Deployment of Supportive Oncology Care Recommended by the Personalized Post-cancer Plan in Patients at the End of Initial Treatment for Gynecological Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Endometrial Cancer

An interventional study of Multidisciplinary assessment and Standard assesment in Gynecologic Cancer and Remission, sponsored by Centre Francois Baclesse. Recruiting at 13 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Centre Francois Baclesse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
268
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This project proposes a structuring of supportive oncology care for the recovery phase after gynecological cancer (ovarian/trope/peritoneum or endometrium). Patients will be divided into three groups based on the identification of oncological support care needs. Patients with supportive oncology care needs will be randomized into two groups: the experimental group, receiving a personalized post-cancer plan with a multidisciplinary assessment of supportive oncology care needs in a day hospital and coordinated follow-up by the referring study nurse, and the control group, receiving a personalized post-cancer plan without a day hospital. Randomization will be stratified according to tumor location (ovary vs. endometrium), use of supportive oncology care during treatment, and treatment center. Patients with no need for supportive oncology care will be followed in an observational cohort. The main objective is to identify and manage the supportive oncology care needs of patients in remission from endometrial or ovarian cancer to improve their quality of life and post-treatment follow-up. A medico-economic analysis will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Remission

Keywords

  • supportive oncology care
  • personalized post-cancer plan
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Francois Baclesse is the lead sponsor of 110 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient > 18 years
  • Patients in remission from treatment of endometrial or ovarian/tumor/peritoneal cancer.
  • Patient who has completed her initial treatment; patients on maintenance therapy are eligible.
  • Fluency in French
  • Patient with access to a telephone line
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Signature of prior to any specific study procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any associated medical or psychiatric condition that could compromise the patient's ability to participate in the study
  • Patient with locoregional or recurrence
  • Patient deprived of liberty, under guardianship or curatorship
  • Simultaneous participation in a therapeutic clinical trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
268 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Delivery of personalized post-cancer plan with multidisciplinary assessment of oncology support care needs in a day hospital

    Other: Multidisciplinary assessment

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Delivery of a personalized post-cancer plan without a day hospital

    Other: Standard assesment

  • Other
    Cohort

    Follow-up as part of an observational cohort

    Other: Observational cohort

Interventions

  • OtherMultidisciplinary assessment

    Delivery of a personalized post-cancer plan with multidisciplinary assessment of oncology support care needs in a day hospital

  • OtherStandard assesment

    Delivery of a personalized post-cancer plan without a day hospital

  • OtherObservational cohort

    Patients with no cancer sequelae, no adverse effects and no need for oncological support care will not be randomized, but will be followed as part of an observational cohort

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the proportion of patients for whom the supportive oncology care recommended in the personalized post-cancer plan has been implemented.

    The primary criterion is the proportion of patients who have implemented at least one of the supportive oncology treatments recommended in the personalized post-cancer plan within 6 months of receiving the personalized post-cancer plan.

    Time frame: 6 months after delivery of personalized post-cancer plan, i.e. about 8 months after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison, 12 months after delivery of the personalized post-cancer plan, of the impact of the intervention on the improvement of side effects and/or sequelae identified at the end of the initial treatments.

    Proportion of patients presenting, at 12 months, an improvement (reduction in grade according to CTCAE v5.0 criteria) in at least one of the side effects and/or sequelae identified at the end of the initial treatments according to the INCa identification grids (1st and 2nd levels).

    Time frame: 12 months after delivery of personalized post-cancer plan, i.e. about 14 months after inclusion

07

Study locations

7 of 13 sites recruiting
  • CHU, Besançon
    Besançon, France
    Recruiting
    • Laura MANSI, MD · Contact
    • Laura MANSI, MD · Principal investigator
  • François Baclesse
    Caen, France
    Recruiting
    • Florence JOLY, Prof · Contact
  • Centre Jean Perrin
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Centre Léon Bérard
    Lyon, France
    Recruiting
    • Olivia LE SAUX, MD · Contact
    • Olivia LE SAUX, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hopital Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
    • Frederic SELLES, MD · Contact
    • Frederic SELLES, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hopital Europeen George Pompidou
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Claire GERVAIS, MD · Contact
  • Hôpital COCHIN
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Anne Catherine PIKETTY, MD · Contact
    • Anne Catherine PIKETTY, MD · Principal investigator
  • Institut Curie
    Paris, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Diana BELLO ROUFAI, MD · Contact
    • Diana BELLO ROUFAI, MD · Principal investigator
  • Hopital privé des Côtes d'Armor
    Plérin, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Jerome MARTIN-BABAU, MD · Contact
    • Jerome MARTIN-BABAU, MD · Principal investigator
  • Institut Curie, St Cloud
    Saint-Cloud, France
    Recruiting
    • Diana BELLO ROUFAI, MD · Contact
    • Diana BELLO ROUFAI, MD · Principal investigator
  • CHU, Saint Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, France
    Not yet recruiting
    • Aurélie BENETON, MD · Contact
    • Aurélie BENETON, MD · Principal investigator
  • CHU
    Strasbourg, France
    Recruiting
    • Virginie LEROY, MD · Contact
    • Philippe TRENSZ, MD · Principal investigator
  • Gustave Roussy
    Villejuif, France
    Recruiting
    • Patricia PAUTIER, MD · Contact
    • Patricia PAUTIER, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 51 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2024
First posted
Aug 14, 2024
StartActual
Jun 7, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 7, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 7, 2029
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06553612
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 14, 2024
Start date
Jun 7, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 7, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 7, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Florence JOLY, Prof
Contact
f.joly@baclesse.unicancer.fr
02 31 45 50 50

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion