ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT04746378PRAISEUpdated Apr 12, 2024

PRedictive Accuracy of Initial Stone Burden Evaluation.

An observational study in Urolithiasis, Ureterolithiasis and Nephrolithiasis, sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is intended to be a prospective registry of patients undergoing any kind of stone treatment that have a pre-operative CT available. This imaging will be used to measure the stone burden in three different ways: in a single dimension (cumulative stone diameter), in two dimensions (surface area) and in three dimensions (volume).The primary purpose is to identify what way of measuring stone burden is most predictive of outcomes after stone treatment such as stone free status, operative time and complications.

Read the detailed description

The current EAU and AUA guidelines still base the recommendations for stone treatment on cumulative stone diameter, a linear measurement of the stone burden. Multiple nomograms rather use the stone burden's surface area to predict post-operative outcomes. More recently, volume has been prposed as the most accurate measure of stone burden and the variable to be reported in stone treatment literature. Although inuitively a three dimensional evaluation is most likely the most accurate representation of the stone burden to be treated.

Several reports however have compared different ways of measuring stone burden and could not confidently identify volume as the most accurate predictor of surgical outcomes.

With this study, we aim to prospectively collect data on a large group of patients that have a pre-operative CT scan available. This imaging will be used to assess the stone burden in different ways, linear, two dimensional and three dimensional. Both procedural and post-operative data will be collected to identify which of the measurements is most accurate in predicting outcomes such as stone free status, operative time and complications such as bleeding. Patients can be included regardless of the procedure that is proposed to treat the stone. After inclusion and after having undergone the procedure, at least one post-operative assessment is necessary to be able to evaluate the pre-operative variables against post-operative outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urolithiasis
  • Ureterolithiasis
  • Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

  • ureteroscopy
  • extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
  • percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • stone burden
  • non-contrast computed tomography
03

In context

Urolithiasis

253 studies on the registry are indexed under Urolithiasis; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 150 across 65 observational studies indexed under Urolithiasis.

Browse Urolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent is the lead sponsor of 689 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing any stone treatment that have a pre-operative CT that can be used for post-processing evaluation of the stone burden with specified software. Primary stone treatment only.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Availability of computed tomography imaging
  • Undergoing any of the previously described procedures: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, uretero(reno)scopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • Able to read and understand the information regarding the study and able to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under the stated age limit
  • No pre-operative computed tomography imaging available
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy

    Patients that are included in the study and undergo a shockwave lithotripsy. The pre- and postoperative assessment remains the same across groups

    Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, CSD · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, SA · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, 3D

  • uretero(reno)scopy

    Patients that are included in the study and undergo a semirigid or flexible uretero(reno)scopy. The pre- and postoperative assessment remains the same across groups

    Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, CSD · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, SA · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, 3D

  • percutaneous nephrolithotomy

    Patients that are included in the study and undergo a percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The pre- and postoperative assessment remains the same across groups

    Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, CSD · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, SA · Diagnostic Test: Computed Tomography, 3D

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testComputed Tomography, CSD

    Measurement of the stone burden by cumulative stone diameter, the sum of linear longest diameters of all the stones to be treated within one patient as measured on the CT or by additional rendering software

    Also known as: Cumulative Stone Diameter

  • Diagnostic testComputed Tomography, SA

    Measurement of the stone burden by surface area, the sum of surface areas of all the stones to be treated within one patient as measured on the CT or by additional rendering software

    Also known as: Stone Surface Area

  • Diagnostic testComputed Tomography, 3D

    Measurement of the stone burden by volume of all the stones to be treated within one patient, as measured on the CT or by additional rendering software

    Also known as: Stone Volume

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stone Free Status

    Any residual stone fragments after the initial treatment

    Time frame: 1 day to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative Time

    Time needed to treat the stone burden as measured during one treatment session

    Time frame: intra-operative

  2. Complication

    Any complication thet can be attributed to the procedure that was performed

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Currently, we have not planned to share individual patient data with any other researchers

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04746378
Collaborators
EAU Young Academic Urologists Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Group, European Association of Urology Section of Uro-Technology, Endourological Society TOWER Research Team
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2021
Start date
Sep 9, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 12, 2024

Study contacts

Thomas Tailly, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion