CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04734444Updated Jun 17, 2025

SonoClear Acoustic Coupling Fluid (ACF) Mimicking Brain Tissue

An interventional study of SonoClear ACF in Brain Tumour, High Grade Glioma and Low-grade Glioma, sponsored by SonoClear AS. Completed at 4 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-17.

Sponsored by SonoClear AS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this clinical investigation is to assess the safety and performance of the SonoClear Acoustic Coupling Fluid (ACF). The performance will be assessed by analysis of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and assessment of image quality by using the Surgeon Image Rating (SIR) Scale.

This is a prospective, multi-centre single-arm study where the performance of SonoClear ACF relative to routinely used acoustic coupling fluid is investigated by each patient being their own control. Patients with the diagnosis of HGG and LGG at up to 10 sites will be included. Additionally, safety data are collected at 30 days and 6 months post-procedure.

Read the detailed description

Ultrasound images will be obtained at different timepoints during the operation. First timepoint being after craniotomy (no fluids involved). Second timepoint being when some tumour is left in the bottom of the deeper part of the resection cavity (approximately 80% of tumour removed), and third timepoint being when the surgeon deems resection of the tumour to be completed. At the second and third timepoint ultrasound acquisition will be performed twice at each timepoint. Once with routinely used saline / Ringer's solution and once with SonoClear ACF.

There are two performance related primary endpoints, based on core lab assessments:

  1. To show that ultrasound images obtained with SonoClear ACF are less influenced by image artefacts compared to images obtained with standard of care saline or Ringer´s solution, by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The CNR is a measure of the relative noise in the image. To achieve this endpoint, the use of SonoClear ACF must lead to superior image quality in comparison with Saline/Ringer´s solution. Superior image quality is defined as the CNR being statistically different between the images obtained with saline/Ringer and SonoClear ACF respectively, i.e., significantly less noise in the images obtained with SonoClear ACF.
  2. To show that ultrasound images obtained with SonoClear ACF are of better quality compared to images obtained with standard of care Saline/Ringer's solution, by using a qualitative assessment, called the Surgeons Image Rating (SIR) scale. A Panel of Experts will assess the quality of the obtained images by answering 3 questions for each image. The SIR a 1-10 numeric rating scale, is used to measure the quality of the image according to three questions to be answered at the three different timepoints during the operation.

This SIR is designed to explore whether SonoClear ACF, having shown to provide better quantitative image quality in the CNR analysis, allows surgeons to detect this improved image quality. Eventually this improved image quality should result in better decision-making during surgery about margins of excision and residual tumour resection.

Primary Safety Endpoint

The primary safety hypothesis is to prove the primary safety event rate is less than 10%. The primary safety event is defined as any core lab determined major MRI finding when post-operative MRI is compared to pre-operative MRI that was found by the DMC to be serious and probably or definitely related to the study device OR any DMC determined serious adverse event that is probably or definitely related to the study device that occurs within 30 days of the procedure. Success is demonstrated by observing 0 of these events out of 37 subjects exposed to SonoClear ACF. This is equivalent to a two-sided p-value less 0.05 for the alternative hypothesis that the primary safety event rate in subjects undergoing tumor resection using ACF is less than 10%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Tumour
  • High Grade Glioma
  • Low-grade Glioma
  • Glioblastoma

Keywords

  • Acoustic Coupling Fluid (ACF)
  • Ultrasound imaging in brain tumour surgery
  • brain tumour surgery
03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,920 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 449 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is above the median of 36 across 1,617 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

SonoClear AS is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A diffuse malignant glial tumour (high (grade III and IV) or low grade (grade I-II) is suspected from the diagnostic MRI scan
  • A tumour that extends at least 3 cm in depth from the surface of the brain (confirmed by MRI)
  • Pre- or peri-procedural confirmed histopathology of glioma
  • ≥18 years of age
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70
  • Life expectancy of more than 30 days at the time of the procedure
  • Negative pregnancy test for female subjects of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to give consent (e.g. severe cognitive impairment)
  • History of brain radiation therapy
  • Recent meningitis (within 6 months prior to screening visit)
  • Other active infection (within 30 days prior to screening visit)
  • Immuno-incompetent patient (e.g. failing immune system due to AIDS)
  • Patients taking immune-suppressive medication
  • Intended biopsy only (meaning: cases not suitable for resection)
  • Known hypersensitivity to egg protein
  • Known hypersensitivity to soybean or peanut protein
  • Known Hypersensitivity to glycerol
  • Known Hypersensitivity to polysorbates
  • Pregnant or lactating females or females who intend to become pregnant during the time of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SonoClear acoustic coupling fluid (ACF) mimicking brain tissue

    SonoClear

    Device: SonoClear ACF

Interventions

  • DeviceSonoClear ACF

    The SonoClear ACF is intended to be used as an acoustic coupling fluid during ultrasound imaging in brain surgery of human beings

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) to quantify the reduction in noise

    To show that ultrasound images obtained when using SonoClear ACF are less influenced by image artefacts compared to images obtained when using routinely used saline solution measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the images.

    Time frame: During ultrasound guided brain tumour resection

  2. Surgeons Image Rating (SIR) to assess the image quality

    Quality assessment of the images is done by the core-lab in a blinded manner using the Surgeon Image Rating (SIR) scale, a 1-10 rating scale to score the quality of the image according to 3 questions at different time points during the operation. First timepoint being after craniotomy (no fluids involved). The second time point is when some tumour is left in the bottom of the deeper part of the resection cavity (approximately 80% of tumour removed), and the third time point being when the surgeon deems resection of the tumour to be completed.

    Time frame: During ultrasound guided brain tumour resection

  3. Adverse events up to 30 days post procedure

    The primary safety hypothesis is to prove the primary safety event rate is less than 10%. A primary safety event is defined as any core lab determined major MRI finding when post-operative MRI is compared to pre-operative MRI that was found by the DMC to be serious and probably or definitely related to the study device OR any DMC determined serious adverse event that is probably or definitely related to the study device that occurs within 30 days of the procedure. Success is demonstrated by observing 0 of these events out of 37 subjects exposed to SonoClear ACF. This is equivalent to a two-sided p-value less 0.05 for the alternative hypothesis that the primary safety event rate in subjects undergoing tumor resection using ACF is less than 10%.

    Time frame: safety data are collected up to 30 days post procedure

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
    Günzburg, 89312, Germany
  • Philipps-Universität Marburg
    Marburg, 35037, Germany
  • Instituto Neurologico "C. Besta"
    Milan, 20133, Italy
  • University Hospital Bratislava
    Bratislava, 83305, Slovakia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04734444
Lead sponsor
SonoClear AS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Jun 17, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion