ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04725981CoToInUpdated Oct 13, 2022

Vaginal Stump Infection After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

An interventional study of Total laparoscopic hysterectomy in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Vaginal Infection, sponsored by Spital Limmattal Schlieren. Terminated at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-13.

Sponsored by Spital Limmattal Schlieren · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Insufficient recruitment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
141
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Comparing two surgical techniques in relation to vaginal stump infection, analysis of patient-based and therapy-based risk factors.

Read the detailed description

Comparing two surgical techniques for vaginal stump infection after total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy. Analysis of patient-based and therapy-based risk factors with the aim of optimizing the surgical technique and objectifying the risk factors. Control group: old colpotomy technique (3 Z-sutures PDS 0); Intervention group: new colpotomy technique (3 Z sutures with PDS 0 and 1 continuous suture with V-Loc 2-0)

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
  • Vaginal Infection

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vaginal closure technique
03

In context

Vaginitis

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Vaginitis; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 141 is above the median of 108 across 71 interventional studies indexed under Vaginitis.

Browse Vaginitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Spital Limmattal Schlieren is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient > = 18 years old
  2. Indication for total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy
  3. Benign uterine disease
  4. Signed for study participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with malignant gynecological diseases
  2. Combination with other abdominal / vaginal interventions, except:

    • Adhesiolysis
    • Endometriosis removal (without rectovaginal endometriosis)
    • Conization
    • Hysteroscopy / curettage
  3. therapy with cytostatics, ,
  4. Bleeding tendency / haemophilia
  5. Acute infection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
141 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A (test surgical technique)

    Colpotomy closure technique: 3 Z-suture with PDS 0 and 1 continuous suture with V-Loc 2-0

    Procedure: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

  • Active comparator
    Arm B (control surgical technique)

    Colpotomy closure technique: 3 Z-suture with PDS 0

    Procedure: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy

    Control group: colpotomy closure technique: 3 Z-sutures PDS 0 Intervention group: colpotomy closure technique: 3 Z sutures with PDS 0 and 1 continuous suture with V-Loc 2-0

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with vaginal stump infection in intervention group and control group

    7.-10. day and 6 weeks postoperatively: 1. T ° C (fever\> = 38 ° C) 2. blood pressure (mm Hg) 3. general condition (good, reduced, bad) 4. Speculum examination / condition of the colpotomy: * non-irritating / intact * dehiscent * bleeding * fibrin-coated * purulent * tender * hyperemic * Infiltrated * Fistula formation 5. Lower abdominal pain (Visual Analog Scale (VAS): 0-10 6. transvaginal sonography: encapsulated RF on vaginal stump J: ☐N: ☐ 7. Laboratory CRP (\> 10mg / L) Hb (\<120 g / L) Lc ( \>10 G / L) The diagnosis of vaginal stump infection was made based on 2 of 3 positive clinical symptoms, 1 additional criterion and the corresponding sonographic findings. I. Clinical symptoms: 1. Fever\> = 38 ° C; 2. Dolence, redness, swelling, pus in the colpotomy area; 3. Lower abdominal pain ( VAS \>5) II. Sonographic signs (TVUS): encapsulated cystic mass on the vaginal stump Additional criteria: 1. CRP increased (\> 10mg / l); 2. Antibiotic therapy needs

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identify of patient-based and treatment-based risk factors for vaginal stump infection.

    connection between Obesity ( BMI \>30 kg/ m2), nicotine abuse ( \>5 cigarettes/d), anemia ( Hb \<120g/L), operation time ( \>120min), uterine volume ( \>100 cm3) and appearance of vaginal stump infection

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Spital Limmattal
    Schlieren, Kanton Zurich 8952, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2022, 49 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2020
First posted
Jan 27, 2021
StartActual
Aug 23, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2022
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 13, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04725981
Lead sponsor
Spital Limmattal Schlieren
Responsible party
Tatiana Naydina Ragaz (Senior Gynecologist in Women's Clinic, Spital Limmattal Schlieren) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2021
Start date
Aug 23, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2022
Completion
Sep 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 13, 2022

Study contacts

Tatiana Naydina Ragaz
principal investigator · Tatiana Naydina Ragaz, Deputy Senior Gynecologist Women's Clinic, Spital Limmattal, Zurich Schlieren

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion