CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04718545Updated Apr 15, 2025Results posted

Effectiveness of Modified-free Gingival Graft for Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession Defects

An interventional study of Mucogingival surgery in Gingival Recession, Localized, sponsored by Göteborg University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-15.

Sponsored by Göteborg University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to evaluate, whether use of the modified free gingival graft (mod-FGG) technique improves treatment outcomes after surgical root coverage at mandibular incisors with gingival recession defects.

Read the detailed description

Gingival recession defects (GRD), defined as displacement of the gingival margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction, are frequent clinical findings in the general population.

The major indications for root coverage procedures are improved esthetics, reduction of root hypersensitivity and the increase of the dimensions of keratinized tissue in order to facilitate infection control and prevent further progression of gingival recession defects. Numerous surgical techniques for root coverage have been suggested, with different degrees of success as assessed by the proportion of complete root coverage. The scientific evidence has revealed that mandibular incisors were associated with the least favourable outcomes when compared to other teeth. The lower success rate and lower predictability of root coverage procedures at lower incisors, teeth with the highest frequency of GRDs, may be related to the unfavorable anatomic conditions including marginal frenum attachment, high muscle pull and a shallow vestibule. These features are frequently encountered in the anterior area of the mandible, while they are rare in the maxillary anterior region.

The so-called "Free Gingival Graft" (FGG) was shown to be the most effective procedure for gingival augmentation at sites with minimal amount of keratinized tissue. Great variability in terms of proportion of root coverage (range: 11% to 87%; mean: 63%) has been reported when applying this technique, however. One of the challenges may be the inadequate blood supply to the portion of the FGG placed on the exposed root surface. A modified version of the FGG technique (mod-FGG) has been proposed, aiming to improve the vascularity of the recipient site over the denuded root surface. However, there is to date no scientific evidence whether the mod-FGG provides better clinical results than the conventional FGG.

The hypothesis of the study is that the mod-FGG will improve predictability and treatment outcomes for root coverage at mandibular incisors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gingival Recession, Localized

Browse trials for

03

In context

Gingival Recession

402 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingival Recession; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 368 interventional studies indexed under Gingival Recession.

Browse Gingival Recession studies →

Lead sponsor

Göteborg University is the lead sponsor of 265 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Periodontally and systemically healthy
  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth)
  • Thin phenotype
  • Probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤3 mm
  • Absence of excessive tooth mobility
  • Absence of cervical composite restorations or non-carious cervical lesions
  • Shallow vestibule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Smoking
  • Alcoholism
  • Para-functional habits
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Excessive crowding or misalignment of teeth
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Free Gingival Graft

    A mucogingival surgery where a gingival graft harvested from the palate is placed on a conventionally prepared recipient site and sutured to cover the mucosal recession

    Procedure: Mucogingival surgery

  • Experimental
    Modified Free Gingival Graft

    A mucogingival surgery where a gingival graft harvested from the palate is placed on a modified recipient site and sutured to cover the mucosal recession

    Procedure: Mucogingival surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureMucogingival surgery

    The gingival recession at mandibular incisor site will be covered by a gingival graft harvested from the palate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Mid-facial Recession Coverage (mRC)

    mRC measured as a percentage

    Time frame: up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Keratinized Tissue (KT) Gain

    KT gain measured in mm

    Time frame: up to 1 year

07

Results

Posted Apr 15, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFree Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival Graft
Started1515
Completed1515
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Mid-facial Recession Coverage (mRC)

mRC measured as a percentage

Time frame:
up to 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Mean Mid-facial Recession Coverage (mRC)
percentageFree Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival Graft
Mean Mid-facial Recession Coverage (mRC)60.7 (56.0 to 65.3)91.8 (87.1 to 96.4)
SecondaryKeratinized Tissue (KT) Gain

KT gain measured in mm

Time frame:
up to 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Keratinized Tissue (KT) Gain
mmFree Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival Graft
Keratinized Tissue (KT) Gain2.2 ± 0.94.2 ± 0.8

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Free Gingival Graft0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Modified Free Gingival Graft0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Free Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival GraftTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years151530
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Free Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival GraftTotal
Mean36.7 ± 10.935.8 ± 10.036.2 ± 10.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Free Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival GraftTotal
Female6915
Male9615
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Free Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival GraftTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Free Gingival GraftModified Free Gingival GraftTotal
United Arab Emirates151530
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg
    Gothenburg, 40530, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tonetti MS, Jepsen S; Working Group 2 of the European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: consensus report of Group 2 of the 10th European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S36-43. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12219. PubMed 24640999 ↗
  • Cairo F. Periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions at single and multiple teeth. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Oct;75(1):296-316. doi: 10.1111/prd.12186. PubMed 28758301 ↗
  • Cortellini P, Bissada NF. Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S204-S213. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671. PubMed 29926948 ↗
  • Zucchelli G, Marzadori M, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, Stefanini M. Coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft techniques for the treatment of deep gingival recession in the lower incisors. A controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Aug;41(8):806-13. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12269. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 24802283 ↗
  • Holbrook T, Ochsenbein C. Complete coverage of the denuded root surface with a one-stage gingival graft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1983;3(3):8-27. No abstract available. PubMed 6358084 ↗
  • Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182. PubMed 24641000 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 10, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Jan 8, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04718545
Lead sponsor
Göteborg University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 22, 2021
Start date
Mar 10, 2021
Primary completion
May 5, 2022
Completion
May 5, 2022
Results posted
Apr 15, 2025
Last update
Apr 15, 2025

Study contacts

Tord Berglundh, DDS, PhD
study chair · Goteborg University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion