CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04715698Updated Jan 20, 2021

Effectiveness of A Hemodynamic-Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control

An interventional study of ICG-guided drug selection and empirical drug selection in Hypertension, sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-20.

Sponsored by Peking University People's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2018, registered Jan 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A single-center, single-blind, randomized study to investigate the effectiveness of a hemodynamic-guided treatment strategy to improve blood pressure control

Read the detailed description

Hypertension is a hemodynamic-related disorder characterized by abnormalities of the cardiac output (CO) and/or systemic vascular resistance (SVR). It is hypothesized that selecting antihypertensive therapy based on patients' hemodynamic profile could lead to more effective blood pressure (BP) control than standard care in a real-world population of hypertensive patients in outpatient setting. A single-center, randomized trial was conducted to include adults with uncontrolled hypertension who seek outpatient care at Peking University People's Hospital between December 2018 and December 2019 in Beijing, China.

Participants were randomly assigned to the standard care group or the hemodynamic group in a 1:1 ratio. Impedance cardiography (ICG) was performed with all participants to measure hemodynamic parameters. Only physicians in the hemodynamic group were provided with patients' ICG findings and a computerized clinical decision support of recommended treatment choices based on patients' hemodynamic profiles. The primary outcomes were the reductions in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) levels at the follow-up visit 8(±4) weeks after baseline. Secondary outcomes included achievement of BP goal of \<140/ 90 mmHg and the reductions in BP by baseline BP, age, sex, and BMI.

The ICG device used (HDproTM CHM T3002/P3005, designed by Beijing Li-Heng Medical Technologies, Ltd, manufactured by Shandong Baolihao Medical Appliances, Ltd.) was developed based on improved hardware and advanced digital filtering algorithms, and has been validated versus both invasive thermodilution and non-invasive echocardiography in different settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • ICG-guided
  • Hemodynamic profiling
  • Impedance cardiography
03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 965 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 90 across 4,995 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking University People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 584 studies on the registry; 233 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. office BP >= 140/90 mmHg
  2. hypertensive patients who were treatment naive or previously treated with 1-3 anti-hypertensives
  3. age 18-85, males or females
  4. agree to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. having unstable hemodynamics diseases, or had myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) within previous 6 months
  2. using large doses of diuretics or beta-blockers (usually refers to double max doses) and can not stop dosing
  3. atrial fibrillation (AF) or severe arrhythmia
  4. severe aortic regurgitation
  5. severe thoracic fluids
  6. height weight out of ranges: 120-230 cm30-230 kg
  7. using more than 3 antihypertensives
  8. known secondary hypertension
  9. refused to sign informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICG-guided

    anti-hypertensive drug selection based on physician's experience and hemodynamic profiling by measured ICG

    Other: ICG-guided drug selection

  • Active comparator
    Empirical

    anti-hypertensive drug selection based on physician's experience only

    Other: empirical drug selection

Interventions

  • OtherICG-guided drug selection

    anti-hypertensive drug selection based on patient's hemodynamic profiling and physician's experience

  • Otherempirical drug selection

    anti-hypertensive drug selection based on physician's experience only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline systolic blood pressure at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline systolic blood pressure at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  2. Change from baseline diastolic blood pressure at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline diastolic blood pressure at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. BP control rate at 8 weeks

    proportion of subjects with BP \< 140/90 mmHg at 8 weeks post-baseline visit

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  2. Change from baseline heart rate (HR) at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline heart rate (heart beats per minute) at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  3. Change from baseline cardiac index (CI) at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline cardiac index (cardiac output devided by body surface area) at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  4. Change from baseline arterial stiffness (AS) at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline arterial stiffness at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  5. Change from baseline systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline systemic vascular resistance index at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

  6. Change from baseline thoracic blood volume standing/supine ratio (TBR) at 8 weeks

    Change from baseline thoracic blood volume standing vs supine ratio at 8 weeks in the window of 4-12 weeks

    Time frame: 8 weeks post-baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking University People's Hospital
    Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lu Y, Wang L, Wang H, Gu J, Ma ZJ, Lian Z, Zhang Z, Krumholz H, Sun N. Effectiveness of an impedance cardiography guided treatment strategy to improve blood pressure control in a real-world setting: results from a pragmatic clinical trial. Open Heart. 2021 Sep;8(2):e001719. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001719. Erratum In: Open Heart. 2021 Oct;8(2):e001719corr1. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001719corr1. Open Heart. 2021 Nov;8(2):e001719corr2. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001719corr2. PubMed 34580169 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04715698
Lead sponsor
Peking University People's Hospital
Collaborators
Yale University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Ningling Sun (Director of Hypertension Department at Heart Center, Peking University People's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 20, 2021
Start date
Dec 31, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Jan 20, 2021

Study contacts

Ningling Sun
principal investigator · Department of Hypertension at Heart Centr, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion