CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04704427Updated Jan 11, 2021

Rehabilitative BCI in Acute Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of Non-invasive BCI training and Traditional Physiotherapy protocol in Stroke, Acute, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-11.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In order to explore the role and expound the mechanism of rehabilitative brain computer interface (BCI)-based training (referred to as the Walk Again Neurorehabilitation protocol) in neurofunctional reconstruction in acute phase of cerebral infarction, the investigators choose non-invasive BCI to study lower limb function of patients with acute cerebral infarction. The investigators evaluate lower limb function, the influence on the central brain functional network and relevant immuno-inflammatory indicators, so that the investigators can explore the therapeutic effect and mechanism in the acute phase of cerebral infarction and provide theoretical bases and feasible guidances for the treatment of post-stroke dyskinesia.

Read the detailed description

The participants will be randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group will receive BCI-based lower limb functional training, 30 minutes per time, 5 times per week, with a 4-week training period; the control group will only receive routine lower limb training, with the same treatment frequency, intensity and duration. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare the relevant evaluation indexes of the experimental group and the control group after treatment and 90 days. In this study, the investigators will use Lower Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA) to comprehensively evaluate the function of lower limbs, Functional Ambulation Category Scale (FAC) and 10-meter walking test (10MWT) for walking ability, modified Barthel index (MBI) for daily living abilities, functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI)and near infrared functional brain imaging (NIRS) to evaluate brain function and network reconstruction, the translocator protein(TSPO)-positron emission tomography (PET) and blood immune inflammation indicators to evaluate systemic and intracranial immune status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute

Keywords

  • Brain Computer Interface
  • Lower Limb Function Recovery
  • Brain Machine Interface
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 217 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The diagnosis of cerebral infarction conforms to the diagnostic criteria of "Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018".
  2. 35 ≤ age ≤ 60 .
  3. Onset (last-seen-well) time to randomization time from 24-72 hours.
  4. First onset.
  5. The lesion is assessed by MRI as a single subcortical infarction of the anterior circulation.
  6. 5 ≤NIHSS≤15 (and 1 ≤6a/b≤3 ).
  7. 1 ≤FAC functional walking scale score ≤ 3.
  8. Signed informed consent from subject or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable vital signs.
  2. Progressive stroke.
  3. Patients have received intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment.
  4. Cardiogenic cerebral embolism.
  5. Presence of moderate or higher vascular stenosis or vulnerable plaque based on Imaging assessment.
  6. With other diseases of the nervous system.
  7. With serious diseases of other systems (severe circulatory system, respiratory system, motor system) and other diseases unsuitable for training, such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, lung infection, severe liver or kidney insufficiency, lower extremity venous thrombosis.
  8. Lower limb dysfunction caused by other reasons, such as fracture, lower limb deformity, etc.
  9. With contraindications in imaging examinations, such as metal implantation, fear of claustrophobia, and severe obesity.
  10. Patient who cannot cooperate with training, such as mental disorders, cognitive dysfunction, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) \<21 points, etc.
  11. Other reasons: alcoholism; pregnancy; skull defect; indwelling urinary catheter; vision defects affect training, etc.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rehabilitative BCI training

    The experimental group will receive brain computer interface-based lower limb function training (BCI-LLT), 30 minutes/time, 5 times/week, with a 4-week training period.. The training using the lower limb orthosis targeted the patient's ability to walk.

    Device: Non-invasive BCI training

  • Active comparator
    Traditional physical therapy protocol

    The control group will only receive traditional physical therapy protocol. The traditional physical therapy protocol of lower limb conducted with the same treatment frequency, intensity and duration of treatment, including muscle strength training, balance training and walking training, etc.

    Other: Traditional Physiotherapy protocol

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-invasive BCI training

    In the experimental group, the participants receive non-invasive rehabilitative BCI training. The training using the lower limb orthosis targeted the patient's ability to walk.

  • OtherTraditional Physiotherapy protocol

    In the control group,the participants receive the traditional physiotherapy protocol, including muscle strength training, balance training and walking training, etc.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Fugl-Meyer score of lower limbs from baseline to 4 weeks.

    It consists of 17 individual assessments that are summed to generate a total score. Scores range from 0-34, the higher the better.

    Time frame: 0-4 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional ambulation category scale

    This scale indicates the ability to walk independently and serves as the primary outcome measure.Participants will be asked to walk at their normal comfortable pace (handheld assistive device is acceptable if needed).

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  2. 10-meter walk test

    Gait speed will be measured as the average of 3 times 10-meter walk tests. Participants will be asked to walk at their normal comfortable pace (handheld assistive device is acceptable if needed).

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  3. Modified Barthel index

    Scale range: 0-100 (with higher scores indicating a greater ability to complete activities of daily living)

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  4. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

    The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity.

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  5. Gait analysis ( stride frequency, step length and velocity)

    To evaluate the walking ability

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  6. Nodal functional connectivity strength analysis by functional magnetic resonance imaging

    To evaluate the brain function and network

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  7. Changes in oxyhaemoglobin in related cortex by Functional near-infrared spectroscopy

    To evaluate the brain cortex function.

    Time frame: 4 weeks and 90 days.

  8. The translocator protein(TSPO)-positron emission tomography (PET)

    Respond to inflammation in the brain

    Time frame: 4 weeks.

  9. Fugl-Meyer score of lower limbs

    It consists of 17 individual assessments that are summed to generate a total score. Scores range from 0-34, the higher the better.

    Time frame: 90 days.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jackson A, Zimmermann JB. Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord--restoring motor function. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Dec;8(12):690-9. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.219. Epub 2012 Nov 13. PubMed 23147846 ↗
  • Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, Laer L, Yilmaz O, Brasil FL, Liberati G, Curado MR, Garcia-Cossio E, Vyziotis A, Cho W, Agostini M, Soares E, Soekadar S, Caria A, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol. 2013 Jul;74(1):100-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.23879. Epub 2013 Aug 7. PubMed 23494615 ↗
  • Lopez-Larraz E, Sarasola-Sanz A, Irastorza-Landa N, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A. Brain-machine interfaces for rehabilitation in stroke: A review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):77-97. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172394. PubMed 30056435 ↗
  • Chaudhary U, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Sep;12(9):513-25. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Erratum In: Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Feb 17;13(3):191. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.23. PubMed 27539560 ↗
  • Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation. Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):767-837. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2016. PubMed 28275048 ↗
  • Donati AR, Shokur S, Morya E, Campos DS, Moioli RC, Gitti CM, Augusto PB, Tripodi S, Pires CG, Pereira GA, Brasil FL, Gallo S, Lin AA, Takigami AK, Aratanha MA, Joshi S, Bleuler H, Cheng G, Rudolph A, Nicolelis MA. Long-Term Training with a Brain-Machine Interface-Based Gait Protocol Induces Partial Neurological Recovery in Paraplegic Patients. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 11;6:30383. doi: 10.1038/srep30383. PubMed 27513629 ↗
  • Selfslagh A, Shokur S, Campos DSF, Donati ARC, Almeida S, Yamauti SY, Coelho DB, Bouri M, Nicolelis MAL. Non-invasive, Brain-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Locomotion Rehabilitation in Individuals with Paraplegia. Sci Rep. 2019 May 1;9(1):6782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43041-9. Erratum In: Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54834-3. PubMed 31043637 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04704427
Lead sponsor
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 11, 2021
Start date
Jan 16, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 25, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 11, 2021

Study contacts

Junwei Hao, MD,PHD
Contact
haojunwei@vip.163.com
010-83199088
Haijie Liu, MD,PHD
Contact
haijieliu@163.com
+8615822841534
Guoguang Zhao
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion