ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04697095SURViVORUpdated Sep 8, 2026

Survival of Monocytes Collected From Patients With Atrophic AMD in Retinal Pigmented Epithelium Explants

An interventional study of Blood samples in Age Related Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affects 2 million people in France and is the main cause of irreversible blindness in France. All patients initially have an early form of the disease. This early form can evolve in two different ways: the atrophic form, which progresses slowly, and the exudative or neovascular form, which has a more rapid evolution. While there are treatments for the exudative form of the disease, there is currently no therapy for the atrophic form of AMD. Recently, it has been demonstrated in atrophic AMD that there is accumulation of inflammatory cells, monocytes, in the sub-retinal space. This space is located between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors. It is physiologically devoid of immune cells (immune privilege). Monocytes secrete many pro-inflammatory molecules, such as cytokines. Some cytokines (IL-1, IL6 and TNF) have a deleterious role on RPE and photoreceptors in mouse models. The identification of specific cytokines would help to better understand this disease and consider potential targeted therapies. Our project is based on the hypothesis that monocytes extracted from patients with AMD have a superior survival on RPE compared to monocytes extracted from healthy patients (without retinal pathology), and more particularly in atrophic forms of AMD. The main aim of this study is to compare the survival of monocytes extracted from patients with atrophic AMD to monocytes extracted from patients without retinal pathology (control) on retinal pigment epithelial cell lines (ARPE-19). Survival will be evaluated by automated counting of monocytes after 24 hours of culture on ARPE-19 after specific immunostaining of monocytes. If the survival of monocytes from patients with the late form of AMD is increased then therapy directly targeting this pathological accumulation of monocytes could be considered. Moreover, the identification of increased secretion of certain cytokines and the demonstration of their deleterious effect on retinal physiology could lead to targeted therapies against them.

02

Conditions studied

  • Age Related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

  • Wet AMD
  • Dry AMD
  • Monocytes
  • Survival
  • Cytokines
  • Inflammation
  • Blood Samples
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 56 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General criteria:

  • Male or female older than 50,
  • Provide written ,
  • Patient affiliated to French social security,
  • Maximum sampling volume (care + research) per 30-day period to be adapted according to the weight of the patient

Specific criteria:

Patient presenting in both eyes:

  • Either the same type of AMD defined according to the modified international AREDS study (Ferris et al. 2013),
  • or early AMD in one eye and atrophic AMD in the other eye, the patient will therefore be defined as being atrophic
  • or early AMD in one eye and exudative AMD in the other eye, the patient will therefore be defined as exudative,
  • or no retinal pathology (control group).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

General criteria:

  • Patient whose weight is less than 50kg,
  • Adult patient under guardianship or curatorship or unable to express consent,
  • Person deprived of liberty,
  • Patient participating in an ongoing clinical trial during the inclusion visit,

Specific criteria:

  • Patient with atrophic AMD in one eye and exudative AMD in the other eye,
  • Patient presenting with chronic retinal pathologies other than AMD, defined according to the modified international AREDS study (Ferris et al. 2013) , in the included eye,
  • Patient taking systemic drugs with an immunomodulatory action: , immunomodulators, chemotherapy or ,
  • Patient with systemic pathologies modifying their immune status,
  • Patient with a history of diabetes,
  • Patient who had dynamic phototherapy on the included eye.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    early / intermediate AMD without neovessels and without macular atrophy

    Other: Blood samples

  • Experimental
    Late exsudative AMD with neovessels

    Other: Blood samples

  • Experimental
    Late AMD with macular atrophy without neovessels

    Other: Blood samples

  • Sham comparator
    Patientes with No AMD

    Other: Blood samples

Interventions

  • OtherBlood samples

    : The blood sample from all groups will be taken on the day of inclusion, in the ophthalmology department. The patient will be cared for by a nurse and then taken to the collection room. A 100 ml sample will be taken (10 tubes of 10 ml). Blood samples will be labeled with the patient's identification number as part of the protocol. They will be transported to the research laboratory in order to be picked up for monocyte extraction. The purification of blood monocytes will be done. In case of excess, the samples will be destroyed at the end of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the survival of human monocytes on ARPE-19 cultures, between the group of patients with atrophic AMD and patient with no retinal pathology (control).

    Survival will be evaluated by automated counting of monocytes

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of human monocyte survival on ARPE-19 cell lines between different groups of patients with AMD or according to severity of disease.

    Survival will be assessed by automated counting of monocytes on the culture plate after specific immunostaining of the monocytes.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Comparison of alterations in ARPE-19 cells lines after culture by human monocytes:

    Comparison of alterations in ARPE-19 cells lines after culture by human monocytes: * Between the atrophic AMD group and the control group, * With respect to the stage of the AMD (early / intermediate AMD, exudative or atrophic AMD), * With respect to the evolving profile of atrophic AMD defined by autofluorescence examination, * With respect to the severity of the clinical involvement of atrophic AMD, * With respect to the recognized risk factors of the disease (age, sex, smoking status and obesity). The alteration of ARPE-19 cells on expression level of OTX2, a ubiquitous transcription factor in EPR cells, will be studied. OTX2 is normally under-expressed in-vitro when a supernatant of lipopolysaccharide-activated monocytes is added to the culture medium.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. To compare the secretion of IL1 from patient's monocytes:

    To compare the secretion of IL1 from patient's monocytes: * Between the atrophic AMD group and the control group, With respect to the stage of the AMD (early / intermediate AMD, exudative or atrophic AMD), * With respect to the evolving profile of atrophic AMD defined by autofluorescence examination, * With respect to the severity of the clinical involvement of atrophic AMD, * With respect to the recognized risk factors of the disease (age, sex, smoking status and obesity). The secretory activity of monocytes on the following cytokines will be evaluated : IL1, IL6 and TNF by two techniques: qPCR and ELISA.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. To compare the secretion of IL6 from patient's monocytes:

    To compare the secretion of IL6 from patient's monocytes:

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. To compare the secretion of TNF from patient's monocytes

    To compare the secretion of TNF from patient's monocytes:

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 66 months after the start.

Of 104 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Macular Degeneration, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 66 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 132 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2020
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
StartActual
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2, 2027
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04697095
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
Start date
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Thibaud Mathis, MD
Contact
thibaud.mathis@chu-lyon.fr
4 26 10 93 22 ext. +33
Christelle Szatanek
Contact
christelle.szatanek@chu-lyon.fr
4 26 73 27 24 ext. +33
Thibaud Mathis, MD
principal investigator · Service d'Ophtalmologie Hospices Civils de Lyon Hôpital de la Croix Rousse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion