CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04696406DE-RISK WFUpdated Dec 19, 2023

Multicenter, Multinational, Clinical Trial of the Performance of RESPINOR DXT to Identify Patients at Increased Risk of Weaning Failure

An observational study in Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Respinor AS. Completed at 9 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-19.

Sponsored by Respinor AS · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
193
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will be a multicenter, multinational, prospective single arm blinded study to validate DXT's performance to identify patients at increased risk of weaning failure during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Continuous diaphragmatic excursion measurements by DXT will be conducted during the patients' first SBT. The recording shall be initiated 15 minutes prior to the first SBT and will end 15 minutes post SBT.

All patients on mechanical ventilation in the ICU meeting the eligibility criteria shall undergo a daily screen for weaning readiness. If any of the components of the daily screen is not met, the patient will not undergo a SBT that day and continued to be screened daily. Patients passing daily screening criteria shall automatically receive an SBT.

The SBT shall last for 30-120 minutes and be performed on continuous positive airway pressure up to 5 cm H2O and pressure support up to 7 cm H2O. The SBT shall be terminated and mechanical ventilation reinstituted at the original settings if the patient meets any of the SBT failure criteria.

A trial is considered successful and physicians will be asked to approve extubation when the patient can breathe spontaneously for the whole trial.

Patients shall be continued to be screened daily until extubation, 21 days after enrolment, performance of tracheostomy, death, or withdrawal of care. All patients shall be followed until hospital discharge or death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Diaphragm ultrasound
  • Diaphragm function
  • Mechanical ventilation
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 193 is above the median of 100 across 545 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Respinor AS is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients under invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients willing and able to give informed consent (either themselves or next of kin)
  2. Have undergone invasive mechanical ventilation > 24 hours
  3. Ready to wean according to criteria (from the sixth international consensus conference on intensive care medicine):

    1. Adequate cough
    2. Absence of excessive tracheobronchial secretion
    3. Resolution of disease acute phase for which the patient was intubated
    4. Clinical stability, defined as stable cardiovascular status (i.e. fC \< 140 beats·min-1, systolic BP 90-160 mmHg, no or minimal vasopressors) and stable metabolic status
    5. Adequate oxygenation, defined as SaO2 > 90% on \< FIO2 0.4 (or PaO2/FIO2 > 150 mmHg) and PEEP \< 8 cmH2O
    6. Adequate pulmonary function, i.e. fR \< 35 breaths·min-1
    7. Adequate mentation, defined as no sedation or adequate mentation on sedation (or stable neurologic patient), i.e., patient awake, calm and responsive to simple orders (squeeze hand, knock the head, close the eyes), no agitation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not registered with a social security system nor entitled to be
  2. Central or spinal neurological injury involving central ventilatory control
  3. Presence of a neuromuscular disease involving respiratory muscles
  4. Use of muscle-paralyzing agents within 24h before the study, except if given for intubation
  5. Known paralysis of a hemidiaphragm or suspicion of paralysis of a hemidiaphragm, defined by the radiographic evidence of elevation of a dome > 2.5 cm compared to the contralateral dome
  6. Tracheostomy
  7. Body mass index >35 kg/m2
  8. Patient with therapeutic limitation, i.e. reduced expectancy to survive
  9. Pregnant woman or protected adult
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
193 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
21 Days
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Weaning failure

    Defined as the failure to pass a spontaneous breathing trial or the need for reintubation or death within 48 hours

    Device: RESPINOR DXT

  • Weaning success

    Defined as a successful spontaneous breathing trial and is not reintubated or dies in the first 48 hours after extubation.

    Device: RESPINOR DXT

Interventions

  • DeviceRESPINOR DXT

    Blinded, continuous diaphragmatic excursion measurements by DXT will be conducted during the patients' first SBT. The recording shall be initiated 15 minutes prior to the first SBT and will end 15 minutes post SBT.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in the rate of weaning failure between patients with a DE < 1.1 cm compared to those with a DE > 1.1 cm.

    Median DE measurements taken during the second minute of the SBT will be used in the analysis. The hypothesis is that patients with DE \< 1.1 cm will have significantly higher rate of weaning failure compared to those with a DE \> 1.1 cm. The relative risk (RR) statistic will be used to assess the null hypothesis of equality.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in the rate of weaning failure with reintubation failure 72 hours and 7 days after extubation between patients with a DE <1.1 cm compared to those with a DE >1.1 cm.

    Median DE measurements taken during the second minute of the SBT will be used in the analysis. The hypothesis is that patients with DE \< 1.1 cm will have significantly higher rate of weaning failure compared to those with a DE \> 1.1 cm. The relative risk (RR) statistic will be used to assess the null hypothesis of equality.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

  2. Subgroup analysis on the difference in the rate of weaning failure between patients with a DE <1.1 cm compared to those with a DE >1.1 cm excluding COVID-19 patients. Similar subgroup analysis for COVID-19 patients.

    Median DE measurements taken during the second minute of the SBT will be used in the analysis. The hypothesis is that patients with DE \< 1.1 cm will have significantly higher rate of weaning failure compared to those with a DE \> 1.1 cm. The relative risk (RR) statistic will be used to assess the null hypothesis of equality.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

  3. Correlation between median DE measurements taken during the second minute of the SBT and duration of mechanical ventilation prior to the first SBT, after the SBT and total mechanical ventilation time.

    Plots of DE values versus MV duration will be presented, together with the estimated correlation coefficient.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

  4. Correlation between median DE measurements taken during the second minute of the SBT and duration of ICU stay prior to the first SBT, after the SBT and total ICU time.

    Plots of DE values versus ICU duration will be presented, together with the estimated correlation coefficient.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

  5. Confirm thresholds for DE to predict weaning outcome during the SBT for the whole sample.

    Thresholds for continuous DE will be defined by ROC curve analysis.

    Time frame: Second minute of the first SBT

Other outcomes

  1. Efficacy - number of patients with overall acceptable signal quality from predefined quality criteria

    Time frame: First SBT

  2. Safety - skin irritation severity

    options 'no irritation', slight redness', 'red and moist tissue', 'granulation tissue', and 'infection leading to debridement'

    Time frame: After first SBT, when removing the sensors

  3. Time spent on achieving good sensor placement

    with options 0-5, 6-10 mins, 11-20 mins, 21-30 mins, \> 30 mins

    Time frame: During sensor attachment before the first SBT

  4. Safety - skin irritation frequency

    Frequency of skin irritation presented in percentage for each category of skin irritation severity

    Time frame: After first SBT, when removing the sensors

  5. Criteria for the Earlier Termination of the Trial - sample size calculation based on weaning failure rate

    Sample size have been calculated with the basis of 4 main assumptions: proportion of weaning failure, assumed relative risk (RR), level of significance, and power. Of these, the proportion of weaning failure is independent of the outcome. Weaning failure rate was assumed to be 20%, requiring 218 patients to meet the endpoints (250 patients accounting for dropouts). If the observed weaning failure is 25%, the number of patients needed is 154 under the same assumptions. One interim assessment of study progress will be conducted. If the observed total proportion of weaning failure is 25% or above (only using the eCRF data, still blinded to the output from DXT), the Sponsor and Principal Investigator can recommend that the trial be concluded and analyzed according to the statistical analysis plan. The interim assessment will be conducted by calculating a 95% CI for the overall weaning failure. The CI will be calculated using the standard normal approximation for one sample proportions.

    Time frame: When a minimum of 154 subjects have been enrolled (180 when accounting for dropouts), through study completion, assessed up to 1 year

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Hopital Saint-Antoine
    Paris, Cedex 12 75571, France
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille - AP-HM
    Marseille, Chem. Des Bourrely 13015, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
    Montpellier, Select One... 34090, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers
    Angers, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc
    Lyon, France
  • Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière
    Paris, France
  • Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo
    Milan, Italy
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
  • St. Olavs University Hospital
    Trondheim, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04696406
Lead sponsor
Respinor AS
Collaborators
The Research Council of Norway
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 6, 2021
Start date
May 11, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2022
Last update
Dec 19, 2023

Study contacts

Alexandre Demoule, MD
principal investigator · Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière
Michele Umbrello, MD
principal investigator · Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo
Øyvind Skraastad, MD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion