ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04693052Updated May 16, 2024Results posted

Attitudes Towards Receiving Mental Health Care Using Telehealth During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

An observational study in Psychiatric Disorder, Mental Health Disorder and Stress, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.

Primary conditionAdjustment DisordersRegistry: Mental DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Mental Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Adjustment Disorders
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Adjustment Disorders, a narrower term within Mental Disorders.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
605
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to collect patients' experiences and feedback to better understand and improve mental health care using telehealth services. This is critically important as telehealth appointments, including both phone and video calls, continue to be offered for regular appointments to reduce in-person interaction as a preventive measure to help control the spread of COVID-19.

Read the detailed description

Studying patients' perceived benefits and challenges of using telehealth services for mental health care will allow us to prioritize improvements to the telehealth experience and potentially, patient adoption of and comfort with remote appointments. This study's results would also inform policy makers and insurance companies about the potential utility of delivering mental health care through telehealth, even beyond the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychiatric Disorder
  • Mental Health Disorder
  • Stress
  • Adjustment Disorders

Keywords

  • Telehealth
  • Telemedicine
  • Telepsych
  • Telepsychiatry
  • Telepsychology
  • Telemental health
  • Survey
  • Attitudes
  • COVID-19
  • pandemic
  • mental health
  • therapy
  • psychiatry
03

In context

Adjustment Disorders Reclassified

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Adjustment Disorders; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 605 is above the median of 231 across 10 observational studies indexed under Adjustment Disorders.

Browse Adjustment Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,423 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 105 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 78 (74%) have results posted.

Compared within Adjustment Disorders, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Mental Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

People receiving mental health care at Northwestern Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults age 18 and over who received mental health care through Northwestern prior to telehealth implementation from March 15th 2019 to March 14th 2020, and had at least one mental health care appointment through Northwestern between March 15th 2020 and September 30th 2020.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults unable to access study questionnaires via computer or mobile device
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
605 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Mental Health patients starting pre-COVID

    Patients receiving mental health care prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Other: No interventions

Interventions

  • OtherNo interventions

    This is a self-reported survey study about receiving mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Choosing Telehealth as an Option for Future Care

    Patients choosing telehealth or not for future case, or unsure)

    Time frame: At baseline

  2. Comparison Between In-person and Telehealth

    Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Telehealth much better, Telehealth better, about the same, In-person better, In-person much better Items compared: Quality of mental health care, ability to express one self, time \& money savings, ease of managing responsibilities, length of wait times and appointments missed

    Time frame: At baseline

  3. Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth

    Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Extremely Dissatisfied) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. Patient Comfort Using Telehealth

    Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely comfortable, Comfortable, Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable, Uncomfortable, Extremely uncomfortable) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

    Time frame: At Baseline

  5. Patient Easy of Using Telehealth

    Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely easy, Easy, Neither easy nor difficult, Difficult, Extremely difficult) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

    Time frame: At Baseline

07

Results

Posted May 16, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Started605
Completed605
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPatient Choosing Telehealth as an Option for Future Care

Patients choosing telehealth or not for future case, or unsure)

Time frame:
At baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Choosing Telehealth as an Option for Future Care
ParticipantsPatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Telehealth
Yes523
No43
Unsure36
PrimaryComparison Between In-person and Telehealth

Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Telehealth much better, Telehealth better, about the same, In-person better, In-person much better Items compared: Quality of mental health care, ability to express one self, time \& money savings, ease of managing responsibilities, length of wait times and appointments missed

Time frame:
At baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comparison Between In-person and Telehealth
ParticipantsPatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Telehealth much better53
Telhealth better43
About the same335
In-person better115
In-person much better52
PrimaryPatient Satisfaction With Telehealth

Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Extremely Dissatisfied) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

Time frame:
At baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth
ParticipantsPatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Telehealth
Extremely satisfied278
Satisfied227
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied56
Unsatisfied30
Extremely unsatisfied7
PrimaryPatient Comfort Using Telehealth

Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely comfortable, Comfortable, Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable, Uncomfortable, Extremely uncomfortable) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

Time frame:
At Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Comfort Using Telehealth
ParticipantsPatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Telehealth
Extremely Comfortable297
Comfortable234
Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable36
Uncomfortable22
Extremely uncomfortable7
PrimaryPatient Easy of Using Telehealth

Subjects will reply on a 5 point scale (Extremely easy, Easy, Neither easy nor difficult, Difficult, Extremely difficult) No standard questionnaire. Internally developed questions

Time frame:
At Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Easy of Using Telehealth
ParticipantsPatients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Extremely easy318
Easy209
Neither easy nor difficult48
Difficult16
Extremely difficult4

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years459
>=65 years141
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Female418
Male179
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Hispanic or Latino55
Not Hispanic or Latino494
Unknown or Not Reported53
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
American Indian or Alaska Native13
Asian31
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American84
White457
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported17
Household income
Household income(Participants)Patients Receiving Mental Health Care Prior to and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Prefer not to answer80
<10k50
10K - <15k37
15K - <30k64
30K - <50k62
50K - <75k84
75K - <100k51
100K - <200k122
>200k47
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Feinberg School of Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04693052
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2021
Start date
Dec 10, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2021
Completion
Jan 31, 2021
Results posted
May 16, 2024
Last update
May 16, 2024

Study contacts

Jeffrey Rado, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion