ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04689282Updated May 2, 2022

Intranasal Inhalations of M2 Macrophage Soluble Factors in Children With Developmental Speech Disorders

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Bioactive Factors, Produced by M2 Type Macrophages (M2-BFs). in Language Delay, Language; Developmental Disorder, Expressive and Language; Developmental Disorder, Receptive, sponsored by Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-02.

Sponsored by Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2020, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators have designed an innovative proof-of-concept trial designed to provide data as to whether the speech difficulties in children with developmental dysphasia (DD) are improved with intranasal inhalations of bioactive factors (BF), produced by macrophages of M2 phenotype (M2-BFs). The rationale for this approach is the ability of central nervous system (CNS) to repair and the important role of macrophages in the regulation of this process. It was found that type 2 macrophages (M2) have anti-inflammatory and neurorestorative potential, in contrast to pro-inflammatory and neurotoxic effects of М1 cells. The influence of M2 is largely realized through the production of a wide spectrum of bioactive factors (cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, neuropeptides, microvesicles etc) that inhibit inflammation, protect neurons from apoptosis, stimulate neurogenesis, the growth and remyelination of axons, the formation of new synapses and activate angiogenesis. This study uses M2-BFs, as therapeutic tool, and intranasal administration focusing on nose to brain transport, as a mode of delivery. Expected clinical effects in treated children: improvement of speech understanding, word formation, grammatical structure of speech and formation of coherent speech.

Read the detailed description

Neuroinflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of any damage to the central nervous system (CNS) profoundly affecting the ability of neural cells to survive and to regenerate. Macrophages play a key role in the regulation of neuroinflammation, but their role is ambiguous. In fact, macrophages can both induce neuronal and glial toxicity and promote tissue repair. The opposite effects of macrophages are largely due to their plasticity and functional heterogeneity. Thus, classical pro-inflammatory macrophages (M1) are tissue-destructive, while anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages mediate tissue repair. In addition, M2 predominantly induce the Th2 response, which is particularly beneficial in CNS repair. Using low serum conditions the investigators have generated M2-like macrophages and evaluated their phenotypic and functional features [1]. The data indicate that M2, in contrast to pro-inflammatory M1, produced significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, IL-18, IL-12), chemokines (IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-1) and Th1/Th2-cytokines (interferon-γ, IL-2, IL-4) coupled with a high IL-10 level. M2 were capable of producing neurotrophic (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, insulin-like growth factor-1), angiogenic (vascular endothelial growth factor), and other growth factors (erythropoietin, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor) with neuroprotective and regenerative activity.

Pilot clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and clinical efficacy of intrathecal administration of M2 in children with severe cerebral palsy [2, 3] and in nonacute stroke patients [4]. Moreover, intranasal delivery of M2 macrophage-derived soluble products reduces neuropsychological deficit in patients with cerebrovascular disease [5]. Given this data, the investigators expect that intranasal administration of the M2-BFs (Bioactive Factors) will reduce the severity of speech disorders in children, including improving speech understanding, sensorimotor speech level, word formation skills, as well as the formation of the grammatical structure of speech and coherent speech. Of note, intranasal administration of M2 soluble factors allow to delivery bioactive agents to brain through the olfactory and trigeminal ways across brain-blood barrier.

02

Conditions studied

  • Language Delay
  • Language; Developmental Disorder, Expressive
  • Language; Developmental Disorder, Receptive
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Speech Disorders in Children

Keywords

  • M2 type macrophages
  • Cytokines
  • Intranasal administration
  • Neuroprotection
  • neuroregeneration
  • Speech disorders
03

In context

Language Development Disorders

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Language Development Disorders; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 74 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Language Development Disorders.

Browse Language Development Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Russian Academy of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 3-18
  • Speech disorders verified by speech therapist and neurologist
  • Adequate hearing/vision to follow conversation
  • Russian speaker
  • A written of the parents/close relatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute infectious disease (bacterial, fungal, or viral)
  • Seizures
  • Intolerance to gentamicin and/or multiple drug allergies
  • Participation in other clinical trials
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal M2-BFs

    Intranasally-Administered Bioactive Factors, Produced by M2 Type Macrophages (M2-BFs). M2 were generated in vitro from peripheral blood of a parent during 7 days. Cell-free culture medium, containing M2-BFs, was collected, and aliquots of 2 mL/vial were cryopreserved. 30 children with speech disorders will receive their first doses (n=2-3) of M2-BFs in Clinic and wait 2 hrs to determine any short-time adverse effects of inhaled dose. The subsequent course of intranasal inhalations (once a day up to 30 days) performed as outpatient treatment.

    Biological: Bioactive Factors, Produced by M2 Type Macrophages (M2-BFs).

Interventions

  • BiologicalBioactive Factors, Produced by M2 Type Macrophages (M2-BFs).

    Intranasal delivery of M2-BFs is performed with the aerosol inhaler device (nebulizer), 2.0 mL once a day up to 30 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the severity of speech disorders according to Speech Assessment Scale (SAS)

    Speech Assessment Scale (SAS) is used to assess language development in children in six functional domains: Speech Comprehension; Sensomotor speech level; Grammatical structure of speech and inflection; Vocabulary and vocabulary skills; Connected speech; Gross and fine motor skills. Max total score:160 points (units of scale). Clinical improvement is manifested in an enhancement in the SAS score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of patients with adverse events

    Occurrence of adverse events including allergic, toxic, inflammatory reactions; neurological worsening; seizures

    Time frame: up to 6 months after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology
    Novosibirsk, 630099, Russian Federation
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sakhno LV, Shevela EY, Tikhonova MA, Ostanin AA, Chernykh ER. The Phenotypic and Functional Features of Human M2 Macrophages Generated Under Low Serum Conditions. Scand J Immunol. 2016 Feb;83(2):151-9. doi: 10.1111/sji.12401. PubMed 26678544 ↗
  • Chernykh ER, Kafanova MY, Shevela EY, Sirota SI, Adonina EI, Sakhno LV, Ostanin AA, Kozlov VV. Clinical experience with autologous M2 macrophages in children with severe cerebral palsy. Cell Transplant. 2014;23 Suppl 1:S97-104. doi: 10.3727/096368914X684925. Epub 2014 Oct 9. PubMed 25302537 ↗
  • Chernykh ER, Shevela EYa, Kafanova MYu, Sakhno LV, Polovnikov EV, Ostanin AA. Monocyte-derived macrophages for treatment of cerebral palsy: a study of 57 cases. J Neurorestoratology. 2018; 6: 41-47. doi.org/10.2147/JN.S158843
  • Chernykh ER, Shevela EY, Starostina NM, Morozov SA, Davydova MN, Menyaeva EV, Ostanin AA. Safety and Therapeutic Potential of M2 Macrophages in Stroke Treatment. Cell Transplant. 2016;25(8):1461-71. doi: 10.3727/096368915X690279. Epub 2015 Dec 14. PubMed 26671426 ↗
  • Shevela E, Davydova M, Starostina N, Yankovskaya A, Ostanin A, Chernykh E. Intranasal delivery of M2 macrophage-derived soluble products reduces neuropsychological deficit in patients with cerebrovascular disease: a pilot study. J Neurorestoratology. 2019; 7: 89-100. doi:10.26599/JNR.2019.9040010
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04689282
Lead sponsor
Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Alexander A Ostanin (Head of Clinical Department, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 30, 2020
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2021
Completion
Sep 1, 2021
Last update
May 2, 2022

Study contacts

Elena R Chernykh, MD, PhD
study chair · Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology
Alexander A Ostanin, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Institute of Fundamental and Clinical Immunology

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion