ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04686318Updated Sep 14, 2022

Accuracy of Infection Biomarkers in the Investigation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pyelonephritis

An observational study in Acute Pyelonephritis, sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-14.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Disease)No conditionIs this wrong?Disease describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
229
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum procalcitonin (PCT) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the initial investigation of patients hospitalized with suspected acute pyelonephritis (APN).

Read the detailed description

Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a severe acute infection in the upper urinary tract, which quite frequently is seen in the emergency department (ED). In our study, we define APN as a urinary tract infection with extension above the bladder, implicated by systemic affection in a suspected urinary tract infection (ie, fever, chills, malaise and/or lethargy beyond normal, signs of sepsis). Most often, an infection of the bladder ascends to the kidneys, causing APN. Symptoms and clinical affection range from mild to severe, but it is always important to recognize and treat APN fast in order to prevent progression to sepsis, renal failure and ultimately death. Uncertain or delayed diagnosis will often lead to an overconsumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which contributes to increased development of resistant bacteria and thus threaten the treatment options of the future.

APN diagnosis is primarily made today on the basis of clinical symptoms and findings in the form of flank tenderness, fever and nausea/vomiting. Typical symptoms of cystitis (dysuria, pollakisuria, suprapubic pain, hematuria) are possible but often absent. Especially elderly can present with more generalized signs of infection with nothing clearly indicating localization to the urinary tract. A positive urine culture verifies the diagnosis, but it is only available after a minimum of 24 hours.

To support the diagnosis of an APN and assess its severity, a measure of the systemic inflammatory response is useful such as abnormal temperature, elevated leucocyte count with neutrocytosis, or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Some uncertainty is associated with CRP because it has a delayed response to bacterial infection and is often elevated in non-infectious inflammatory conditions. A more sensitive and specific marker is desired that can differentiate between bacterial and viral infection and reflect the severity of the APN. Serum procalcitonin (PCT) has potential as a diagnostic tool in suspected bacterial infections and can distinguish between viral and bacterial urinary infections. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR) might have a potential as a marker for acute bacterial infections requiring antibiotic treatment. However, there are no well-conducted studies which compare simultaneously all three biomarkers diagnostic abilities for bacterial infections in general or in relation to APN.

The investigators hypothesize that serum CRP, PTC and suPAR have an impact on diagnosing, prognosis, and treatment of patients with a verified APN.

The objectives of the study are:

  • To investigate the diagnostic value of CRP, PCT and suPAR in the diagnosis of APN
  • To identify the prognostic value of CRP, PCT and suPAR in relation to adverse events in patients with verified APN
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Pyelonephritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • C-reactive protein
  • serum procalcitonin
  • soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor
  • diagnostic and prognostic markers
  • emergency department
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 336 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Acutely admitted patients with suspected Acute pyelonephritis (APN) from three emergency departments (EDs) in the Region of Southern Denmark (Hospital Sønderjylland, Hospital Lillebælt, Odense University Hospital)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Suspicion of APN assessed by the receiving physician at the ED

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
  • Admission within the last 14 days
  • Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
  • Pregnant women
  • Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies ( positive CD4 \<200, Patients receiving treatment (ATC L04A), treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
229 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • suspected acute pyelonephritis

    All patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute pyelonephritis assessed by the receiving physician

    Diagnostic Test: Biomarkers for acute pyelonephritis

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBiomarkers for acute pyelonephritis

    Blood samples will be collected by a medical laboratory technologist and transferred to the local laboratory for analysis of CRP, PCT and suPAR. Laboratory staff will be blinded to participant diagnosis and outcome. CRP and PCT results will be available to the treating physician, but the suPAR result will not be available. * Diagnostic test of CRP. CRP will be measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay (Tina-quant®, Roche) on Roche/Hitachi Cobas© systems. * Diagnostic test of PCT: Plasma PCT will be quantified by an automated sandwich immunoassay "ECLIA" (Elecsys®, BRAHMS PCT-analyses) on Cobas© within two hours from collection according to standard procedure. * Diagnostic test of suPAR: Plasma suPAR will be quantified by using the commercial available suPARnostic© Tubilatex assay reagents (ViroGates, Denmark) on Cobas© as previously validated (35). Separated plasma is kept refrigerated and analysed for suPAR within 48 hours after collection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Verified and non verified acute pyelonephritis (APN)

    The decision of whether patients admitted with suspicion of APN actually has a final diagnosis of APN is based on a combination of all findings during admission. The verification of diagnosis requires human handling, interpretation and judgment. Therefore, in this study, an expert panel will define the reference standard for the diagnosis APN. The expert panel consists of two independent consultants from the emergency department with significant experience in emergency medicine and acute infections. They will individually determine whether or not the patient admitted suspected with APN actually had this diagnosis. The final diagnosis will be based on all available relevant information from the patient medical record including MRI of the kidneys. A standardized template will be used. Disagreement will be discussed until a consensus is reached.

    Time frame: 2 months after patient discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensive care unit treatment

    transfer to ICU during current admission (binary outcome)

    Time frame: within 60 days from admission to the emergency department

  2. Length of stay

    days spent in hospital during current admission

    Time frame: within 60 days from current admission to the emergency department

  3. The number of participants who died within 30 days

    binary - 30-days mortality

    Time frame: within 30 days from arrival day

  4. The number of participants who died within 90 days

    binary - 90 days mortality

    Time frame: within 90 days from arrival to emergency department

  5. Readmission

    binary

    Time frame: within 30 days from day of discharge

  6. In-hospital mortality

    binary

    Time frame: within 60 days from admission to the emergency department

Other outcomes

  1. Bacteriuria

    Binary outcome defined by microbiologist on urine culture analysis

    Time frame: urine collected within 4 hours of arrival to the emergency department

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital of Southern Jutland
    Aabenraa, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hamie L, Daoud G, Nemer G, Nammour T, El Chediak A, Uthman IW, Kibbi AG, Eid A, Kurban M. SuPAR, an emerging biomarker in kidney and inflammatory diseases. Postgrad Med J. 2018 Sep;94(1115):517-524. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135839. Epub 2018 Sep 3. PubMed 30177549 ↗
  • Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin and other biomarkers to improve assessment and antibiotic stewardship in infections--hope for hype? Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Jun 13;139(23-24):318-26. doi: 10.4414/smw.2009.12584. PubMed 19529989 ↗
  • Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606. PubMed 34593497 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2021 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 11 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2020
First posted
Dec 28, 2020
StartActual
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Feb 28, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04686318
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 28, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2022
Completion
Jun 1, 2022
Last update
Sep 14, 2022

Study contacts

Christian Backer Mogensen
study chair · Hospital of Southern Jutland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion