CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04677179INSTRUCT-UCUpdated Sep 5, 2023Results posted

A Study of LY3471851 in Adult Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

A Phase 2 interventional study of LY3471851 and Placebo in Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by Nektar Therapeutics. Terminated at 116 sites in 22 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-05.

Sponsored by Nektar Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study terminated due to enrollment futility.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
81
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The reason for this study is to determine if the study drug LY3471851 is safe and effective in adult participants with active ulcerative colitis (UC). The study treatment will last about 52 weeks.

Read the detailed description

In stage 1, two doses (high and low) of LY3471851 will be compared to placebo. In stage 2, up to two additional doses (to be confirmed) of LY3471851 will be compared to placebo.

LY3471851 (NKTR-358) is a potential first-in-class therapeutic that may address an underlying immune system imbalance in people with many autoimmune conditions. It targets the interleukin (IL-2) receptor complex in the body in order to stimulate proliferation of inhibitory immune cells known as regulatory T cells. By activating these cells, LY3471851 may act to bring the immune system back into balance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colitis, Ulcerative

Keywords

  • T regulatory cells (Tregs)
  • Interleukin 2
  • Interleukin-2
03

In context

Colitis

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Colitis; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 81 is above the median of 60 across 771 interventional studies indexed under Colitis.

Browse Colitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nektar Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Have moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) as defined by a modified Mayo score (MMS) of 4 to 9 with an endoscopic subscore (ES) ≥2, with endoscopy performed within 14 days before baseline.
  • Have evidence of UC extending proximal to the rectum (with ≥15 centimeters (cm) of involved colon).
  • Have up-to-date colorectal cancer surveillance performed according to local standard.
  • Participants are either one of the following:
  • Have failed conventional treatments including inability to tolerate oral or intravenous corticosteroids or immunomodulators (6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine or methotrexate), or history of corticosteroid dependence (an inability to successfully taper corticosteroids without return of UC) and neither failed or demonstrated intolerance to advanced therapy (eg, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin therapies, anti-IL12/23p40 therapies, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor) OR,
  • Have failed advanced therapies such as treatment with 1 or more advance therapies (eg, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] antagonists, anti-integrin therapies, anti-IL12/23p40 therapies, Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor) at doses approved for the treatment of UC with documented history of failure to respond to or tolerate such treatment.
  • Have had an established diagnosis of UC of ≥3 months in duration before baseline which includes endoscopic evidence of UC and a histopathology report that supports a diagnosis of UC. Supportive endoscopy and histopathology reports must be available in the source documents.
  • Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must test negative for pregnancy as indicated by a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit followed by a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to first exposure to study drug.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed with indeterminant colitis, proctitis (colitis limited to the rectum only; less than 15 centimeter (cm) from the anal verge or Crohn's disease.
  • Have received any of the following for treatment of UC: cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or thalidomide within 2 weeks of screening, rectally administered corticosteroids or 5-aminosalicylic acid treatments within 2 weeks of screening.
  • Have had or will need abdominal surgery for UC (for example, subtotal colectomy).
  • Have failed 3 or more classes of advanced therapies approved for treatment of UC (eg, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] antagonists, anti-integrin therapies, anti-IL12/23p40 therapies, Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor).
  • Have evidence of toxic megacolon, intra-abdominal abscess, or stricture/stenosis within the small bowel or colon.
  • Have any history or evidence of cancer of the gastrointestinal tract
  • Have myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke or heart failure within 12 months prior to screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
81 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High dose LY3471851

    Participants received a subcutaneous injection of high dose LY3471851 every 2 weeks from weeks 0 to 12. Week 12 responders entered the maintenance period and continued with the same treatment. Week 12 non-responders entered the extension period where they received subcutaneous injection of high dose LY3471851 every 2 weeks up to week 50. At week 26, extension period non-responders were discontinued from treatment. Post-treatment, participants entered follow-up period and were observed for 6 weeks for safety.

    Drug: LY3471851

  • Experimental
    Low dose LY3471851

    Participants received a subcutaneous injection of low dose LY3471851 every 2 weeks from weeks 0 to 12. Week 12 responders entered the maintenance period and continued with the same treatment. Week 12 non-responders entered the extension period where they received subcutaneous injection of high dose LY3471851 every 2 weeks up to week 50. At week 26, extension period non-responders were discontinued from treatment. Post-treatment, participants entered follow-up period and were observed for 6 weeks for safety.

    Drug: LY3471851

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received a subcutaneous injection of placebo every 2 weeks from weeks 0 to 12. Week 12 responders entered the maintenance period and continued with the same treatment. Week 12 non-responders entered the extension period where they received subcutaneous injection of high dose LY3471851 every 2 weeks up to week 50. At week 26, extension period non-responders were discontinued from treatment. Post-treatment, participants entered follow-up period and were observed for 6 weeks for safety.

    Drug: LY3471851 · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLY3471851

    administered SC

    Also known as: NKTR-358

  • DrugPlacebo

    administered SC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12

    Clinical remission is defined as achieving a Modified Mayo Score (MMS) sub-score for rectal bleeding=0, stool frequency=0, or stool frequency=1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, and endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12

    Clinical response is defined as a decrease in the MMS of ≥2 points and ≥30% decrease from baseline, and a decrease of ≥1 point in the rectal bleeding sub-score from baseline or a rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Remission at Week 12

    Endoscopic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 12

    Endoscopic response is defined as a decrease of ≥1 point in the MMS endoscopy sub-score from baseline. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

    Symptomatic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for stool frequency=0, or stool frequency=1 with a decrease of ≥1 point from baseline, and rectal bleeding =0. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Response at Week 12

    Symptomatic response is defined as a ≥30% decrease from baseline in the composite clinical endpoint of the sum of MMS sub-scores of stool frequency and rectal bleeding. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic Remission at Week 12

    Histologic Remission is defined as Geboes score \<2 or subscores = 0 for Grade 2a, 2b, 3, 4, and 5. The Geboes score is a 7-item instrument used to identify histologic changes in UC. The 7 items are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0=No abnormality to 3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: lamina propria eosinophils (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2B: lamina propria neutrophils (0= No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (0=None to 3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction(0=none to 3=Unequivocal crypt destruction),and Grade 5: Erosion or ulceration:(0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 4=Ulcer or granulation tissue). The grade with severe histological observation is considered the Geboes score and ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 12

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Healing (HEMH)

    HEMH is defined as Geboes score \<2 AND endoscopic remission. Geboes score is a 7-item instrument used to identify histologic changes in UC. The 7-items are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0=No abnormality to 3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: lamina propria eosinophils (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2B: lamina propria neutrophils (0= No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (0=None to 3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction(0=none to 3=Unequivocal crypt destruction),and Grade 5: Erosion or ulceration:(0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 4=Ulcer or granulation tissue). The grade with severe histological observation is considered the Geboes score and ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating severe disease. Endoscopic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability).

    Time frame: Week 12

  8. Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) - Total Score

    IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire that measures four aspects of participants' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance (10 items), systemic symptoms (5 items), emotional function (12 items), and social function (5 items). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale, where 7 denotes "not a problem at all" and 1 denotes "a very severe problem." The responses are summed to produce a total score ranging from 32 to 224, with higher score indicating a better quality of life. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) model with treatment, baseline value, previous advanced therapy failure status (yes/no), baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no), baseline disease activity (MMS: \[4 to 6\] or \[7 to 9\]) and region (North America/Europe/Other) as fixed factors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  9. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration of LY3471851 (Ctrough) at Week 12

    C-trough is the concentration of drug in the blood immediately before the next dose was administered.

    Time frame: Predose at week 12

07

Results

Posted Sep 5, 2023

Participant flow

The study consisted of: * a 12-week induction treatment period: participants randomly received either high dose LY3471851 or low dose LY3471851 or placebo. * a 40-week maintenance/extension treatment period (final dose at week 50 and study assessments at week 52) * (i) Week 12 responders enter the maintenance period where they continued to receive the same treatment to which they were randomly assigned. (Continued..)

Induction Treatment Period
Participant flow — Induction Treatment Period
MilestoneHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Started3235140000000
Received at least one dose of study drug3235140000000
Completed1922120000000
Not completed131320000000
Withdrew: Adverse event1000000000
Withdrew: Physician decision1010000000
Withdrew: Protocol violation0100000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4110000000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor71100000000
Maintenance Treatment Period
Participant flow — Maintenance Treatment Period
MilestoneHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Started00081050000
Completed0000000000
Not completed00081050000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0000100000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0001000000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor0007950000
Extension Treatment Period
Participant flow — Extension Treatment Period
MilestoneHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Started00000026000
Completed0000000000
Not completed00000026000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0000006000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0000002000
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor00000018000
Post-Treatment Follow-up Period
Participant flow — Post-Treatment Follow-up Period
MilestoneHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Started0000000253011
Completed0000000000
Not completed0000000253011
Withdrew: Adverse event0000000100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0000000230
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0000000100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0000000310
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor0000000182611

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12

Clinical remission is defined as achieving a Modified Mayo Score (MMS) sub-score for rectal bleeding=0, stool frequency=0, or stool frequency=1 with ≥ 1 point decrease from baseline, and endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 1214.3 (0 to 32.6)7.1 (0 to 16.7)17.2 (3.5 to 31)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.750 · Odds ratio (or): 0.57 · 95% CI 0.03 to 11.32
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.838 · Odds ratio (or): 0.80 · 95% CI 0.10 to 6.21
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12

Clinical response is defined as a decrease in the MMS of ≥2 points and ≥30% decrease from baseline, and a decrease of ≥1 point in the rectal bleeding sub-score from baseline or a rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 1235.7 (10.6 to 60.8)39.3 (21.2 to 57.4)41.4 (23.5 to 59.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.563 · Odds ratio (or): 0.57 · 95% CI 0.10 to 3.30
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.759 · Odds ratio (or): 0.78 · 95% CI 0.17 to 3.64
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Remission at Week 12

Endoscopic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability). The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Remission at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Remission at Week 1228.6 (4.9 to 52.2)14.3 (1.3 to 27.2)24.1 (8.6 to 39.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.163 · Odds ratio (or): 0.18 · 95% CI 0.02 to 1.93
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.439 · Odds ratio (or): 0.54 · 95% CI 0.11 to 2.77
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 12

Endoscopic response is defined as a decrease of ≥1 point in the MMS endoscopy sub-score from baseline. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 1221.4 (0 to 42.9)32.1 (14.8 to 49.4)37.9 (20.3 to 55.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.821 · Odds ratio (or): 1.29 · 95% CI 0.17 to 9.88
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.572 · Odds ratio (or): 1.43 · 95% CI 0.37 to 5.49
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Remission at Week 12

Symptomatic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for stool frequency=0, or stool frequency=1 with a decrease of ≥1 point from baseline, and rectal bleeding =0. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Remission at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Remission at Week 1221.4 (0 to 42.9)32.1 (14.8 to 49.4)27.6 (11.3 to 43.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.886 · Odds ratio (or): 1.18 · 95% CI 0.14 to 10.16
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.784 · Odds ratio (or): 0.78 · 95% CI 0.14 to 4.18
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Response at Week 12

Symptomatic response is defined as a ≥30% decrease from baseline in the composite clinical endpoint of the sum of MMS sub-scores of stool frequency and rectal bleeding. The MMS is a scoring system for assessment of UC and is composed of sub-scores of stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools, 3=5 or more stools more than normal), endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease, 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen, 3=blood alone passed). Total MMS score is sum of all sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating higher disease activity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Response at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Symptomatic Response at Week 1242.9 (16.9 to 68.8)42.9 (24.5 to 61.2)44.8 (26.7 to 62.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.331 · Odds ratio (or): 0.37 · 95% CI 0.06 to 2.43
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.407 · Odds ratio (or): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.10 to 2.52
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic Remission at Week 12

Histologic Remission is defined as Geboes score \<2 or subscores = 0 for Grade 2a, 2b, 3, 4, and 5. The Geboes score is a 7-item instrument used to identify histologic changes in UC. The 7 items are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0=No abnormality to 3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: lamina propria eosinophils (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2B: lamina propria neutrophils (0= No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (0=None to 3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction(0=none to 3=Unequivocal crypt destruction),and Grade 5: Erosion or ulceration:(0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 4=Ulcer or granulation tissue). The grade with severe histological observation is considered the Geboes score and ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic Remission at Week 12
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic Remission at Week 127.1 (0.0 to 20.6)7.1 (0.0 to 16.7)10.3 (0.0 to 21.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.564 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.50 · 95% CI 0.38 to 6.00
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.681 · Risk ratio (rr): 1.51 · 95% CI 0.21 to 10.97
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Healing (HEMH)

HEMH is defined as Geboes score \<2 AND endoscopic remission. Geboes score is a 7-item instrument used to identify histologic changes in UC. The 7-items are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0=No abnormality to 3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: lamina propria eosinophils (0=No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 2B: lamina propria neutrophils (0= No increase to 3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (0=None to 3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction(0=none to 3=Unequivocal crypt destruction),and Grade 5: Erosion or ulceration:(0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 4=Ulcer or granulation tissue). The grade with severe histological observation is considered the Geboes score and ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating severe disease. Endoscopic remission is defined as achieving a MMS sub-score for endoscopy=0 or 1 (excluding friability).

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Healing (HEMH)
percentage of participantsPlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Healing (HEMH)0 (0 to 0)3.6 (0 to 10.4)6.9 (0 to 16.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.317 · Risk difference (rd): 3.6 · 95% CI -3.3 to 10.4
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.238 · Risk difference (rd): 6.9 · 95% CI -2.3 to 16.1
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) - Total Score

IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire that measures four aspects of participants' lives: symptoms directly related to the primary bowel disturbance (10 items), systemic symptoms (5 items), emotional function (12 items), and social function (5 items). Responses are graded on a 7-point Likert scale, where 7 denotes "not a problem at all" and 1 denotes "a very severe problem." The responses are summed to produce a total score ranging from 32 to 224, with higher score indicating a better quality of life. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) model with treatment, baseline value, previous advanced therapy failure status (yes/no), baseline corticosteroid use (yes/no), baseline disease activity (MMS: \[4 to 6\] or \[7 to 9\]) and region (North America/Europe/Other) as fixed factors.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) - Total Score
score on a scalePlacebo (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) - Total Score26.71 ± 9.34636.42 ± 7.64025.76 ± 7.143
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.378 · Ls mean difference: 9.71 · 95% CI -12.17 to 31.60
  • Placebo (Induction Treatment Period) vs High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period) · ANCOVA · p = 0.928 · Ls mean difference: -0.95 · 95% CI -21.78 to 19.88
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration of LY3471851 (Ctrough) at Week 12

C-trough is the concentration of drug in the blood immediately before the next dose was administered.

Time frame:
Predose at week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · microgram per milliliter (µg/mL)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration of LY3471851 (Ctrough) at Week 12
microgram per milliliter (µg/mL)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Concentration of LY3471851 (Ctrough) at Week 1291.3 ± 49139 ± 105

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline to Follow-up (Up To Week 58). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)0/32 (0%)2/32 (6.3%)20/32 (62.5%)
Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)15/35 (42.9%)
Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)5/14 (35.7%)
High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)4/8 (50%)
Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)0/10 (0%)1/10 (10%)6/10 (60%)
Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)1/5 (20%)
High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)5/26 (19.2%)
High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)0/30 (0%)1/30 (3.3%)1/30 (3.3%)
Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Vulval abscessInfections and infestations0/320/350/140/81/100/50/260/250/300/11
Lower limb fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/320/350/140/80/100/50/260/251/300/11
ProctitisGastrointestinal disorders1/320/350/140/80/100/50/260/250/300/11
SyncopeNervous system disorders1/320/350/140/80/100/50/260/250/300/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventHigh Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Maintenance Treatment Period)Placebo (Maintenance Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Extension Treatment Period)High Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)Placebo (Post-Treatment Follow-up Period)
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders8/326/350/141/80/100/52/260/250/300/11
PyrexiaGeneral disorders7/322/351/142/81/100/50/260/250/300/11
Covid-19Infections and infestations2/323/351/141/80/101/52/260/250/300/11
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/320/350/141/80/101/50/260/251/300/11
TonsillitisInfections and infestations0/320/350/140/80/101/50/260/250/300/11
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/320/350/140/80/101/50/260/250/300/11
MalaiseGeneral disorders0/320/350/141/80/100/50/260/250/300/11
Injection related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/320/350/141/81/100/50/260/250/300/11
Body temperature increasedInvestigations4/320/350/141/80/100/50/260/250/300/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/321/350/140/80/100/50/260/250/300/11

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)Total
Mean39.2 ± 12.544.5 ± 13.845.7 ± 15.242.6 ± 13.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)Total
Female109625
Male2226856
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian54211
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American2002
White25311268
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)High Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Low Dose LY3471851 (Induction Treatment Period)Placebo (Induction Treatment Period)Total
Argentina2114
Australia0101
Belgium0011
Czechia2406
Hungary3306
Japan3115
South Korea1315
Latvia2305
Poland2215
Russia55313
Slovakia1113
Ukraine77418
United States3418
08

Study locations

116 sites
  • Dedicated Clinical Research
    Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340, United States
  • I.H.S. Health, LLC
    Kissimmee, Florida 34741, United States
  • Gastroenterology Associates of Pensacola, PA
    Pensacola, Florida 32503, United States
  • Atlantic Digestive Health Institute
    Morristown, New Jersey 07960, United States
  • Biopharma Informatic, LLC
    Houston, Texas 77084, United States
  • Southern Star Research Institute, LLC
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Care Access Research - Ogden
    Ogden, Utah 84403, United States
  • DOM- Centro de Reumatologia
    Caba, Buenos Aires 1111, Argentina
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno" CEMIC
    Caba, Buenos Aires C1431FWO, Argentina
  • Mautalen Salud e Investigacion-Centro de Osteopatías Médicas
    Ciudad Autonoma De Buenos Air, Buenos Aires C1128AAF, Argentina
  • Centro Médico Privado de Reumatología
    Tucumán, T4000AXL, Argentina
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
    Concord, New South Wales 2139, Australia
  • Paratus Clinical Research Brisbane
    Albion, Queensland 4010, Australia
  • Mater Adult Hospital Brisbane
    South Brisbane, Queensland 4700, Australia
  • St. Vincent's Hospital
    Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, Bruxelles-Capitale, Région De 1070, Belgium
  • Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde - Site Notre Dame
    Tournai, Wallonne, Région 7500, Belgium
  • AZ Maria Middelares
    Gent, 9100, Belgium
  • Chronos Pesquisa Clínica
    Brasília, Distrito Federal 72145-450, Brazil
  • Nucleo de Pesquisa Clínica do Rio Grande do Sul-NPCRS
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90430-001, Brazil
  • HMCP - Hospital e Maternidade Celso Pierro - PUC-Campinas
    Campinas, Sao Paulo 13060-904, Brazil
  • Pesquisare
    Santo Andre, Sao Paulo 09080-110, Brazil
  • Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estudo Estadual
    Sao Paulo, SP 04039-004, Brazil
  • Upeclin - Unidade de Pesquisa Clínica da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - UNESP
    Botucatu, São Paulo 18618-687, Brazil
  • CEMEC - Centro Multidisciplinar de Estudos Clinicos EPP Ltda
    São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo 09715-090, Brazil
  • Hepatogastro
    Sao Paulo, 04543-001, Brazil
  • Gastroenterology and internal medicine research institute
    Edmonton, Alberta T5R 1W2, Canada
  • Gastroenterology Research, Nova Scotia Health Authority
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H2Y9, Canada
  • CISSS de la Montérégie - Centre Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne
    Greenfield Park, Quebec J4V2H1, Canada
  • McGill University
    Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
    HefeiCity, Anhui 230022, China
  • First affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510655, China
  • Tongji Hosp Tongji Med Col Huazhong Univ of Sci & Tech
    Wu Han, Hubei 430030, China
  • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Taian City Central Hospital
    Taian, Shandong 271000, China
  • Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Ruijin Hospital
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • A-Shine
    Pilsen, Plzeň-město 312 00, Czechia
  • MUDr. Gregar, s.r.o.
    Olomouc, 779 00, Czechia
  • PreventaMed, s.r.o.
    Olomouc, 779 00, Czechia
  • I. Interni klinika FN Plzen
    Plzen-Lochotin, 304 60, Czechia
  • Nemocnice Slaný
    Slany, 274 01, Czechia
  • CHU De Grenoble Hopital Albert Michallon
    Grenoble Cedex 09, 38043, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Mont de Marsan
    Mont-de-Marsan Cedex, 40024, France
  • Acad. F. Todua Medical Center - Research Institute of Clinical Medicine
    Tbilisi, 0112, Georgia
  • Medical Center: Medinvestment
    Tbilisi, 0186, Georgia
  • Clinexpert SMO
    Budapest, 1033, Hungary
  • Óbudai Egészségügyi Centrum
    Budapest, 1036, Hungary
  • Bugát Pál Kórház
    Gyöngyös, 3200, Hungary
  • CLINFAN Szolgáltató Kft
    Szekszard, 7100, Hungary
  • Shree Giriraj Multispeciality Hospital
    Rajkot, Gujarat 360004, India
  • Gujarat Hospital - Gastro and Vascular Centre
    Surat, Gujarat 395009, India
  • Kingsway Hospital
    Nagpur, Maharashtra 440001, India
  • Midas Multispeciality Hospital Pvt.Ltd.
    Nagpur, Maharashtra 440010, India
  • SR Kalla Memorial Gastro & General Hospital
    Jaipur, Rajasthan 302006, India
  • Apollo Speciality Hospital - Teynampet
    Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600035, India
  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research
    Chandigarh, 160012, India
  • Gandhi Hospital
    Telangana, 500003, India
  • Soroka Medical Center
    Beer Sheva, 8410101, Israel
  • Galilee Medical Center - Internal A
    Nahariya, 22100, Israel
  • Kaplan Medical Center
    Rehovot, 7610001, Israel
  • Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital
    Chikushino, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Tokushukai Sapporo Tokushukai Hospital
    Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 004 0041, Japan
  • Sapporo Medical University Hospital
    Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
  • Infusion Clinic
    Osaka-shi, Osaka-Fu 530-0011, Japan
  • Sai Gastroenterologist Proctology
    Fujiidera, Osaka 583-0027, Japan
  • Matsuda Hospital
    Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka-Ken 4328061, Japan
  • Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-To 162 8655, Japan
  • Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital
    Koto-ku, Tokyo 135 8577, Japan
  • Kyorin University Hospital
    Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
  • Fukuoka University Hospital
    Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
  • Sameshima Hospital
    Kagoshima, 892-0846, Japan
  • Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital
    Toyama, 930-8550, Japan
  • Yamagata University Hospital
    Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do 443380, Korea, Republic of
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea 06351, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
    Seoul, Korea 06591, Korea, Republic of
  • Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
    Busan, 48108, Korea, Republic of
  • Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
    Gangwon-do, 26426, Korea, Republic of
  • Pauls Stradins Clinical Univeristy Hospital
    Riga, Rīga LV-1002, Latvia
  • NZOZ Vivamed
    Warsaw, Mazowieckie 03-580, Poland
  • Szpital Miejski Sw. Jana Pawla II
    Elblag, 82-300, Poland
  • WIP Warsaw IBD Point Profesor Kierkus
    Warszawa, 00-728, Poland
  • ETG Zamość
    Zamosc, 22-400, Poland
  • SC Pelican SRL
    Oradea, Bihor 410469, Romania
  • SC Med Life SA
    Bucuresti, 010719, Romania
  • SC Centrul Medical Sana SRL
    Bucuresti, 011025, Romania
  • Spital Clinic Colentina
    Bucuresti, Romania
  • Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Cluj
    Cluj-Napoca, 400006, Romania
  • S.C. Materna Care S.R.L.
    Timisoara, 300645, Romania
  • Olla-Med
    Moscow, Moskva 105554, Russian Federation
  • Novosibirski Gastrocenter
    Novosibirsk, Novosibirskaya Oblast' 630007, Russian Federation
  • Rostov State Medical University
    Rostov-on-Don, Rostovskaya Oblast' 344091, Russian Federation
  • Open Joint Stock Company Clinical and Diagnostic Center Euromedservice
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • The University Clinic of OSMU
    Omsk, 644050, Russian Federation
  • SPb SBIH "City Mariinskaya Hospital"
    Saint-Petersburg, 194104, Russian Federation
  • GOU VPO St-Petersburg SMA n/a Mechnikov Fed. Agen of Health
    St. Petersburg, 195067, Russian Federation
  • FNsP FDRoosevelta Banska Bystrica
    Banska Bystrica, 97517, Slovakia

Showing the first 100 of 116 sites across 22 countries.

09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 3, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 18, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04677179
Lead sponsor
Nektar Therapeutics
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2020
Start date
Mar 22, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 9, 2022
Completion
Aug 9, 2022
Results posted
Sep 5, 2023
Last update
Sep 5, 2023

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Nektar Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion