CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07711418ZENITH AD-2Updated Sep 8, 2026

A Phase 3 Study of Rezpegaldesleukin (NKTR-358) for Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Rezpegaldesleukin and Placebo in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by Nektar Therapeutics. Recruiting at 13 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Nektar Therapeutics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
510
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an interventional, randomized, parallel group, treatment, Phase 3, double blind study to assess the effect of Rezpegaldesleukin in participants 12 years of age or older with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, as compared to placebo.

The estimated participant overall duration is approximately 15 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients, ≥ 12 years of age on the day of signing the informed consent form and weighing ≥ 40 kg prior to randomization at Baseline
  • Chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) defined as onset of AD signs and symptoms

    ≥ 12 months prior to Screening as determined by the Investigator through patient interview and/or review of medical history at the Screening Visit

  • Patients must meet the following AD severity criteria:
  • IGA score ≥ 3 (scale of 0 to 4) at Screening and Baseline
  • ≥ 10.0% of BSA involvement at Screening and Baseline
  • EASI ≥ 16.0 at Screening and Baseline
  • Are candidates for systemic therapy and have history, documented by a physician and/or the Investigator, of inadequate response to existing topical medications within 6 months preceding Screening, or history of intolerance to a topical therapy
  • Provide written, informed consent to participate in the study and follow the study procedures, including compliance with the use of highly effective contraceptives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are currently experiencing or have a history of concomitant skin conditions other than AD, including skin infection in the area affected by the patient's AD that requires treatment with systemic antimicrobial therapy
  • Are currently experiencing or have a history of unstable course of AD
  • History of chronic idiopathic urticaria at any time or urticaria from other causes within 4 weeks prior to randomization at the Baseline Visit.
  • Have a history of TCS use suggestive of a high risk for topical corticosteroid (TCS) withdrawal
  • Have received any of the following treatments at any time before Screening: aldesleukin; investigational IL-2 analog; systemic biologic; oral JAKi; or any prior investigational agent for AD
  • Have a current or recent acute, active infection
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
510 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Blinded Induction Period: Rezpegaldesleukin every 2 weeks

    Rezpegaldesleukin every 2 weeks during the induction period

    Drug: Rezpegaldesleukin

  • Placebo comparator
    Blinded Induction Period: Placebo

    Placebo every 2 weeks during the induction period

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Blinded Maintenance Period: Rezpegaldesleukin every 4 weeks

    Rezpegaldesleukin every 4 weeks during the maintenance period

    Drug: Rezpegaldesleukin

  • Experimental
    Blinded Maintenance Period: Rezpegaldesleukin every 12 weeks

    Rezpegaldesleukin every 12 weeks during the maintenance period

    Drug: Rezpegaldesleukin

  • Placebo comparator
    Blinded Maintenance Period: Placebo

    Placebo every 4 weeks during the maintenance period

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Open-Label Escape

    Rezpegaldesleukin at a frequency determined by the investigator during the open-label escape

    Drug: Rezpegaldesleukin

Interventions

  • DrugRezpegaldesleukin

    Pharmaceutical form: Injection solution Route of administration: subcutaneous

    Also known as: NKTR-358

  • DrugPlacebo

    Pharmaceutical form: Injection solution Route of administration: subcutaneous

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. US only: Number of participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 and reduction ≥ 2 points from baseline at Week 24

    The IGA scale ranges from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  2. Non-US regions only: Number of participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 at Week 24

    The IGA scale ranges from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  3. Non-US regions only: Number of participants with a ≥ 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline at Week 24 (EASI-75)

    The EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe atopic dermatitis.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. US only: Number of participants with a ≥ 75% reduction in EASI score from baseline at Week 24 (EASI-75)

    The EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe atopic dermatitis.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  2. Number of participants with a ≥ 90% reduction in EASI score from baseline at Week 24 (EASI-90)

    The EASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe atopic dermatitis.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  3. Number of participants at week 6 achieving a 4-point or greater improvement in Itch numerical rating scale (NRS) in the subset of participants with a 4-point or greater Itch NRS at baseline

    The itch NRS goes from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more severe itch.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 6

  4. Number of participants at week 24 achieving a 4-point or greater improvement in Itch numerical rating scale (NRS) in the subset of participants with a 4-point or greater Itch NRS at baseline

    The itch NRS goes from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more severe itch.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  5. Number of participants at week 6 achieving a 4-point or greater improvement in Skin Pain numerical rating scale (NRS) in the subset of participants with a 4-point or greater Skin Pain NRS at baseline

    The Skin Pain NRS goes from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more severe pain.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 6

  6. Number of participants at week 24 achieving a 4-point or greater improvement in Skin Pain numerical rating scale (NRS) in the subset of participants with a 4-point or greater Skin Pain NRS at baseline

    The Skin Pain NRS goes from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more severe pain.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  7. Number of participants at week 6 achieving a 1.25-point or greater improvement in Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale Question 1 (ADSS Q1) in the subset of participants with a 1.25-point or greater ADSS Q1 at baseline

    The ADSS Q1 goes from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more difficulty sleeping.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 6

  8. Number of participants at week 24 achieving a 1.25-point or greater improvement in ADSS Q1 in the subset of participants with a 1.25-point or greater ADSS Q1 at baseline

    The ADSS Q1 goes from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more difficulty sleeping.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  9. Change in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score from baseline at Week 24 in the subpopulation of patients with a 0.5-point or greater ACQ-5 at baseline

    The ACQ-5 goes from 0 to 6, with higher score indicating worse asthma control.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  10. Number of participants at week 24 achieving a 0.5-point or greater improvement in ACQ-5 in the subset of participants with a 0.5-point or greater ACQ-5 at baseline

    The ACQ-5 goes from 0 to 6, with higher score indicating worse asthma control.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  11. Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score from baseline at Week 24 in the subpopulation of patients with an 8.9-point or greater SNOT-22 at baseline

    The SNOT-22 scores range from 0 to 110, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  12. Number of participants at Week 24 achieving a 8.9-point or greater reduction from baseline in SNOT-22 in the subpopulation of patients with an 8.9-point or greater SNOT-22 at baseline

    The SNOT-22 scores range from 0 to 110, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  13. Number of participants at week 24 achieving an Adapted Investigator's Global Assessment (aIGA) response of 0 or 1

    The aIGA scale ranges from 0 to 1, with a lower score indicating improvement in atopic dermatitis.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 24

  14. Number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  15. Number of participants with treatment emergent serious adverse events

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  16. Number of participants with treatment related serious adverse events

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  17. Number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events of special interest

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  18. Number of participants with treatment related adverse events of special interest

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  19. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  20. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose hold

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

  21. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose modifications

    Time frame: Through participant study completion, approximately Week 56

06

Study locations

13 of 13 sites recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35203, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Oxnard, California 93030, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Palmdale, California 93551, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Sacramento, California 95815, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Tamarac, Florida 33321, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Kirksville, Missouri 63501, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Lee's Summit, Missouri 64064, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89144, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Robbinsville, New Jersey 08691, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    The Bronx, New York 10455, United States
    Recruiting
  • Nektar Investigative Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43213, United States
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07711418
Lead sponsor
Nektar Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2026
Start date
Aug 7, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Nektar Recruitment
Contact
StudyInquiry@nektar.com
855-482-8676
Study Director
study director · Nektar Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion