ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04676230Updated Dec 19, 2020

Effectiveness of an ICCMS™ Caries Management Program.

An interventional study of Experimental group and Control group in Caries, sponsored by Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 7 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-19.

Sponsored by Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2014, registered May 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare in schoolchildren the effectiveness of an updated caries management program based on the current caries paradigm with the ICCMS™ system (International Caries Classification and Management System) versus an adjusted Colombian dental public health service caries management program, in terms of: 1- caries risk probability, 2- caries lesions, 3- parents' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding children's oral health.

Null hypothesis: the caries management program based on its current paradigm offers the same degree of effectiveness than the conventional caries management program.

Alternative hypothesis: the caries management program based on its current paradigm offers a different degree of effectiveness than the conventional caries management program.

Read the detailed description

This study counts with ethical approval from the Ethics Board in Universidad El Bosque (UEB 008-2014).

Population:

The study population will be 6-7 year-old schoolchildren from the six participant dental schools.

Baseline examination:

The baseline examination will be conducted by the site coordinator examiner. Once the informed consent is signed by the parents and the children give their acceptance, a comprehensive examination will be performed, including:

  • Parents' knowledge, attitudes and practices survey regarding children's oral health.
  • Caries risk probability assessment through individual caries risk assessment plus patient current caries status: low, moderate, high.
  • Radiographic caries detection using the ICCMS™ criteria.
  • Clinical examination:

    • dmf/DMF T/S
    • PUFA Index
    • Dental surface restoration conditions
    • ICCMS™ caries visual detection: Cs: Sound Surfaces (ICDAS code 0); Ci: Initial-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 1 y 2); Cm3/Cm4: Moderate-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 3-microcavity y 4-dentin shadow) and Ce: Extensive-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 5 y 6)
  • Progression assessment of present caries lesions using ICCMS™ criteria in terms of Active or Inactive.

Synthesis and analysis:

The synthesis and analysis of the gathered information will conduce to the ICCMS™ caries management decision plan in terms of caries risk likelihood management and caries lesions management with a structure conservative approach.

This study counts with ethical approval from the Ethics Board in Universidad El Bosque (UEB 008-2014).

Population:

The study population will be 6-7 year-old schoolchildren from the six participant dental schools.

Baseline examination:

The baseline examination will be conducted by the site coordinator examiner. Once the informed consent is signed by the parents and the children give their acceptance, a comprehensive examination will be performed, including:

  • Parents' knowledge, attitudes and practices survey regarding children's oral health.
  • Caries risk probability assessment through individual caries risk assessment plus patient current caries status: low, moderate, high.
  • Radiographic caries detection using the ICCMS™ criteria.
  • Clinical examination:

    • dmf/DMF T/S
    • PUFA Index
    • Dental surface restoration conditions
    • ICCMS™ caries visual detection: Cs: Sound Surfaces (ICDAS code 0); Ci: Initial-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 1 y 2); Cm3/Cm4: Moderate-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 3-microcavity y 4-dentin shadow) and Ce: Extensive-stage caries lesion (ICDAS codes 5 y 6)
  • Progression assessment of present caries lesions using ICCMS™ criteria in terms of Active or Inactive.

Synthesis and analysis:

The synthesis and analysis of the gathered information will conduce to the ICCMS™ caries management decision plan in terms of caries risk likelihood management and caries lesions management with a structure conservative approach.

The first step of the management plan considers the caries risk likelihood.

The management options include:

  • Low likelihood: Tooth brushing 2/day with a fluoride toothpaste (≥1,000 ppm F-), following the dental team instructions; motivational engagement (discuss with patients how to improve oral health behaviors - including amount of sugar); cross-brushing for erupting first molars; use of dental floss; recalls every 6 months, including professional cleaning.
  • Moderate likelihood: Previous activities plus prescribed F- mouthrinse; sealants in caries risk surfaces, F- varnish 2 times/year; motivational interviewing; recalls every 3 months, including professional cleaning.
  • High likelihood: Previous activities and increase F- varnish to 4 times/year plus Topical F- application; counseling: reduce sugar amount \& frequency; recalls every 3 months, including professional cleaning.

The patient's caries risk factors management plan is tailored at the individual level and involves actions to protect sound tooth surfaces from developing new caries lesions, and all current active and inactive lesions from progressing. In addition, it aims at lowering the caries risk likelihood of the patient when moderate or high, and to maintain it if low.

The second step is the caries diagnosis decision making at the surface level which conducts to the surface diagnosis decision matrix. This decision relies on the clinical classification of dental caries using ICCMS™ criteria and the radiographic extent of the lesion (enamel or dentin) plus the activity status of the lesions. Only active caries lesions require caries management. The level of intervention depends on the clinical caries classification of the surface or tooth and the radiological extent (when information is available) of the lesion in enamel or dentin. Management levels of active caries lesions are classified as follows:

  • MInitial: Initial caries management stage (non-operative care (NOC)-control)
  • MModerate: Moderate caries management stage (minimally invasive surgical caries management with no or minimal dentin removal)
  • MExtensive: Extensive caries management stage (invasive surgical caries management with dentin removal).

For sound surfaces, risk based prevention is performed. For inactive lesions, restorations might be performed depending on esthetic and plaque retention reasons.

Intervention:

The children will be randomized in two groups as follows:

Group A (Experimental): ICCMS™ caries management according to the surface diagnosis decision matrix of active Ci, Cm3/4, and Ce caries lesions. Individual management according to the future patient caries risk likelihood with specific prevention strategies.

Group B (Control): conventional caries management. Operative treatment of Cm and Ce caries lesions (caries shadows and cavities) with conventional restorative treatment. Systematic caries risk management with twice-a-year fluoride gel application, sealants on all occlusal surfaces and oral health literacy.

When the management plan is finalized in both groups, patients must continue attending the clinic according to their group for the following three years.

Follow-up assessments will be conducted at one and three years after baseline, with the baseline indicators as described above.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caries
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children from 6 to 7 years old
  • signed
  • Children in standard good general health

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with physical disability and/or cognitive diseases
  • Children whose family will is planning to move from the city in the following 36 months
  • Children with orthopedic/orthodontic appliances at baseline
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
240 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    caries management based on the ICCMSTM: Patient intervention according to the caries risk likelihood: high, moderate or low. Surfaces intervention according to the surface diagnosis decision matrix (ICCMSTM): Mi: Initial caries management, Mm: Moderate caries management, and Me: Extensive caries management.

    Procedure: Experimental group

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Systematic patient caries risk intervention (all managed as high risk patients). Surfaces intervention with conventional caries management of cavitated/dentin caries lesions (restorative treatment).

    Procedure: Control group

Interventions

  • ProcedureExperimental group

    Caries management based on the ICCMSTM: Patient intervention according to the caries risk likelihood: high, moderate or low. Surfaces intervention according to the surface diagnosis decision matrix (ICCMSTM): Mi: Initial caries management, Mm: Moderate caries management, and Me: Extensive caries management.

    Also known as: ICCMS™ group

  • ProcedureControl group

    Systematic patient caries risk intervention (all managed as high risk patients). Surfaces intervention with conventional caries management of cavitated/dentin caries lesions (restorative treatment).

    Also known as: Colombian Health System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of ICCMSTM caries likelihood after 1 and 3 years.

    Change in ICCMSTM caries likelihood subjects' distribution after 1 and 3 years

    Time frame: up to 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence of new caries lesions in terms of ICCMSTM categories after 1 and 3 years.

    Change in the presence of new caries lesions in terms of ICCMSTM categories after 1 and 3 years.

    Time frame: up to 36 months

  2. Number of appointments after 1 and 3 years.

    Total number of appointments after1 and 3 years.

    Time frame: up to 36 months

  3. Progression of existing caries lesion in terms of ICCMSTM categories after 1 and 3 years.

    Change in the progression of existing caries lesion in terms of ICCMSTM categories after 1 and 3 years.

    Time frame: up to 36 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad El Bosque
    Bogotá, D.c: 11001, Colombia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2014 to primary completion in Nov 2017, 44 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 10, 2019
First posted
Dec 19, 2020
StartActual
Mar 2014
Primary completionActual
Nov 2017
CompletionActual
May 2019
Last update
Dec 19, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04676230
Lead sponsor
Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá
Responsible party
Stefania Martignon (Principal Investigator, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2020
Start date
Mar 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2017
Completion
May 2019
Last update
Dec 19, 2020

Study contacts

Stefania Martignon, PhD
principal investigator · UNICA - Unidad de Investigación en Caries, Facultad de Odontología

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion