CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04673604Updated Jul 20, 2022

From Preserved, to Preservative-free Cyclosporine 0.1% Enhanced Triple Glaucoma Therapy

An interventional study of Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale) and mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering in Glaucoma and Ocular Surface Disease, sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-20.

Sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2018, registered Dec 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen to a preservative-free (PF) one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center, prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease from preserved to triple preservative-free therapy with and without cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

Read the detailed description

Halting and reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (GTR-OSD) will improve the success of long-term medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. Chronic medical therapy for glaucoma may be immensely benefitted by limiting disabling GTR-OSD, which would aid in the prevention of blindness. In 2015 a novel cationic formulation of cyclosporine A 0.1% was approved with once in the evening dosing in Europe. It is an effective, targeted immunomodulatory compound reducing inflammatory mediators and providing healing of the ocular epithelium. There remains however a paucity of published controlled evidence for GTR-OSD patients treated with this formulation. In addition, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of switching from a combined preserved anti-glaucoma regimen, to a preservative-free one, while employing sufficiently robust OSD metrics. The investigators have therefore carried out a single center prospective, crossover investigation to compare the 6-month effect of switching well controlled open-angle glaucoma patients with at least moderate GTR-OSD, from preserved to triple PF therapy with and without PF cyclosporine 0.1% dosed in the evening.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma
  • Ocular Surface Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Glaucoma

1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 65 across 1,272 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki is the lead sponsor of 274 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with well controlled open-angle glaucoma
  • Patients chronically treated for more than 6 months with preserved, branded, or generic, triple antiglaucoma therapy comprising latanoprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination
  • Subjects should have experienced at least 1 symptom of dry eye (soreness, scratchiness, dryness, grittiness, and burning)
  • Additionally, patients should demonstrate at least one of the objective signs for OSD at baseline: positive conjunctival staining with lissamine green and/or evidence of positive corneal staining with fluorescein (assessed with the 15-point Oxford scale),
  • Patients must show a BUT\<8 seconds
  • On screening patients should show a Schirmer test without anesthesia (Schirmer-I test) ≥3 and ≤10 mm in 5 minutes.
  • When both eyes qualify the worse eye will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Best corrected visual acuity \<1/10
  • Patients with severe dry eye disease or Sjogren's disease
  • Presence of eyelid abnormality, corneal disorder or abnormality, ocular surface metaplasia, filamentous keratitis, or corneal neovascularization
  • Patients who have undergone ocular surgery (of any type, including laser surgery), or ocular trauma within 4 months prior to screening
  • Subjects who had punctal occlusion, or diathermy within 3 months prior to screening or abnormality of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus.
  • Known allergy, or sensitivity to any of the study medications
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease, or history or active signs of ocular trauma, infection, inflammation, allergic disease, or herpes; corneal ulcers; recurrent erosions; or uveitis
  • Female patients will be excluded if they are pregnant, breastfeeding, planning a pregnancy, or are unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Triple preservative-free therapy with placebo in the evening

    In this arm subjects will be randomized to topical therapy comprising preservative-free tafluprost drops dosed in the evening (20:30) and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination drops administered twice daily (8:00 and 20:00). Patients will use placebo (artificial tears) in the evening (21:00) for 6 months. At the end of this period patients will be crossed over to the other therapy (cyclosporine 0.1% in the evening)

    Diagnostic Test: Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale) · Drug: mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering

  • Active comparator
    Triple preservative-free therapy with cyclosporine 0.1% in the evening

    In this arm subjects will be randomized to topical therapy comprising preservative-free tafluprost drops dosed in the evening (20:30) and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination drops administered twice daily (8:00 and 20:00). Patients will use cyclosporine 0.1% drops in the evening (21:00) for 6 months. At the end of this period all patients will be crossed over to the other therapy (placebo in the evening)

    Diagnostic Test: Assessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale) · Drug: mean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAssessment of ocular surface staining (Oxford score 0-15 scale)

    Corneal and conjunctiva staining will be recorded according to the Oxford grading scheme for ocular staining (0-15 score).

  • Drugmean diurnal intraocular pressure-lowering

    At the end of each 6-month period patients will undergo diurnal intraocular pressure assessment with both therapies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change from baseline in ocular staining (Oxford score)

    The primary efficacy endpoint for this crossover study will be the mean change from baseline in the total ocular staining score as determined by the 15-point Oxford scale of staining on the study eye.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean diurnal IOP

    Mean diurnal intraocular pressure with the two preservative-free therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Osmolarity

    Mean tear osmolarity with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

    Time frame: 6-months

  3. Matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) over-expression

    Mean MMP-9 over-expression with the two PF therapies versus preserved baseline will be evaluated as secondary endpoint.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Department of Ophthalmology
    Thessaloniki, 55536, Greece
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04673604
Lead sponsor
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
Responsible party
AGP Konstas (Professor in Ophthalmology, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
Start date
May 6, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019
Completion
Jun 29, 2020
Last update
Jul 20, 2022

Study contacts

Andreas Katsanos, MD, PhD
study director · University of Ioannina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion