CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04670016Updated Apr 15, 2026

HRQL and Symptom Assessment for Patients With DIPG or Recurrent and Re-irradiated Brain Tumours and Their Caregivers

An observational study in DIPG, Brain Tumor, Pediatric, Recurrent and Brain Tumor, DIPG, sponsored by University of Calgary. Completed at 13 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
2 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although many children with brain tumours are successfully cured of their disease, a substantial proportion of patients suffer disease recurrence and require further treatment. This therapy may involve a repeat course of radiation (RT2). Based on retrospective data, re-irradiation may provide palliative and even potentially curative benefit. However, such retrospective data are subject to bias, which may over-report survival and under-report toxicity. Furthermore, we do not know how re-irradiation affects patients' HRQOL. The goal of this research is to prospectively describe the HRQOL of patients diagnosed with DIPG and recurrent brain tumors and their families before and after re-irradiation to more accurately assess the benefit versus the toxicity of this treatment.

In addition, if we are able to demonstrate the feasibility of collecting HRQOL information on a routine basis we will be able to justify the need to conduct this research further and implement HRQOL screening as a standard of care for these patients. Re-irradiation for children with DIPG and recurrent brain tumours will not cure these children from their disease but may improve neurological function and wellbeing. We postulate that the opportunity of more time to say the final good bye and creating memories will facilitate bereavement and prevent psychological dysfunction of parents and siblings. A greater understanding of what helps these families may enable clinicians to better support these children and their families in this difficult disease course. Ultimately our goal is to improve the psychological experience of these patients and their families.

Read the detailed description

Many children diagnosed with brain tumours are at significant risk of disease recurrence following their initial treatment, with recurrence rates ranging from 30-100% depending on the type of brain tumour. Disease recurrence represents a serious clinical issue in brain tumour patients and when this occurs, additional treatment is needed. These treatments may result in further damage to the surrounding normal brain tissue, resulting in neurocognitive decline (brain or mental function) and reduced quality of life. A novel treatment option for these patients is to administer a second course of radiation (re-irradiation). However, the effects of re-irradiation on quality-of-life are poorly studied. This study aims to increase the knowledge surrounding re-irradiation, particularly with regards to HRQOL.

The primary objective of the proposed study is to describe the HRQOL and symptoms for children diagnosed with DIPG or recurrent brain tumours treated with repeat radiation and their caregivers over time.

We have four Aims. Aim 1: To describe the HRQOL trajectory and symptoms for children diagnosed with DIPG and in children treated with re-irradiation for a recurrent brain tumour and their caregivers over time. Aim 2: To identify critical time points of HRQOL difficulty across the trajectory of DIPG/recurrent brain tumour treatment and to ascertain demographic and/or medical sequelae that are related to HRQOL outcomes. Aim 3: To determine the feasibility of conducting routine assessment of HRQL in children diagnosed with DIPG/recurrent brain tumours and their caregivers based on recruitment and retention rates. Aim 4: To report the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN), local control, progression-free survival and overall survival after re-irradiation.

Our goal to is enroll 25 to 30 patient/caregiver dyads diagnosed with DIPG and 32 patient/caregiver dyads treated with re-RT for a recurrent/progressive brain tumour onto the trial over the study period and to follow patients until their disease progresses again, which has been, on average, 6 months after completion of RT2.

Once deemed eligible, individual patient recruitment will be the responsibility of the institution Clinical Research Assistant (CRA). Upon consenting to take part in the study, patients and families will be contacted using an online administration and scoring program. HRQOL assessments will take 15-25 minutes to complete at each time point. Baseline questionnaires will be completed at the time of recurrence or progressive DIPG or other brain tumor (+/- 7 days from start of treatment, maximum 14 days). Patients will then complete HRQOL measures at the end of re-irradiation and then again every two months.

Necrosis and local tumour control will be assessed using MRI ordered as part of standard-of-care follow-up (recommended scan interval every 3-6 months until 5 years post-treatment). Necrosis and other toxicities, if present without evidence of disease recurrence, will be graded at baseline and each post-RT2 standard-of-care visit using CTCAE v5.0 (a rating scale of side effects). Steroid use and Lansky play score will be recorded at each visit. Progression and death will be collected from the health record. Re-irradiation dosimetry (in electronic RT-DICOM format) will be requested for all enrolled patients.

Study measures will be available in both English and French. HRQOL measures will include: the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) General module; the PedsQL Brain Tumour module; the PedsQL Family Impact module; and the Short Form 36 (SF-36), to assess parent quality of life via physical and mental health functioning subscales. Children who require help completing questionnaires will be aided by a CRA. For those 2 to 5 years of age or those who have cognitive disability that impairs their ability to self-report as assessed by their parents, proxy-report by parent or caregiver will be used.

The Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) will also be used to screen for pediatric cancer symptoms.

The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Pain Interference measures short forms will be administered to screen for current symptoms of anxiety, depression and assess pain interference.

A linear mixed models approach will be used to compare HRQOL outcomes over time. Further, HRQOL outcomes will be compared across assessment time points and paired sample t-tests will be conducted to identify critical periods of significantly lower and/or higher HRQOL for patients and caregivers. Correlational analyses will be used to explore variables that might emerge as related to HRQL outcome scores. Recruitment rates (patients participating vs. patients eligible) and retention rates (non-completion, lost to follow-up) will be examined. Finally, all incident cases of radiation necrosis without obvious tumour progression will be examined, while accounting for competing risks of disease progression and death from any cause.

02

Conditions studied

  • DIPG
  • Brain Tumor, Pediatric, Recurrent
  • Brain Tumor, DIPG
  • Radiation Toxicity
  • Radiation Exposure
  • Brain Tumor, Pediatric

Keywords

  • health-related quality of life
  • psychosocial
  • re-irradiation
  • DIPG
  • pediatric brain tumor
03

In context

Brain Neoplasms

1,960 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Neoplasms; 516 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 100 across 380 observational studies indexed under Brain Neoplasms.

Browse Brain Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Up to 30 patients diagnosed with DIPG and up to 32 patients diagnosed with another recurrent or progressive brain tumor will be enrolled in this study.

There will be no registration on study for screening purposes only. Eligible patients who consent to this study therapy will be registered at the PI's institution, specifically with the PI's research coordinator. A study subject number will be assigned to the patient upon registration.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient aged >2 and \<21 years treated with a repeat course of radiation for DIPG or other recurrent or progressive brain tumour.
  2. Radiation for the first tumour must be a primary brain neoplasm (i.e. not leukemia).
  3. Enrollment within 14 days of starting re-irradiation (RT2).
  4. Patients with malignant transformation of the first tumour are eligible.
  5. There are no restrictions on histology or RT1/RT2 dose-fractionation or RT2 body site. In other words, RT2 may be directed at a different location to RT1.
  6. The patient is treated at a site where the study is approved by the local ethics board
  7. Consent, and, if applicable, assent, has been obtained according to institutional standards

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inability to complete questionnaires in English or French.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient/Caregiver dyad diagnosed with DIPG

    All of these criteria must be met for a patient to be eligible for this study: 1. Patient aged \>2 and \<21 years treated with a repeat course of radiation for DIPG 2. Radiation for the first tumour must be a primary brain neoplasm (i.e. not leukemia). 3. Enrollment within 14 days of starting re-irradiation (RT2). 4. Patients with malignant transformation of the first tumour are eligible. 5. There are no restrictions on histology or RT1/RT2 dose-fractionation or RT2 body site. In other words, RT2 may be directed at a different location to RT1. 6. The patient is treated at a site where the study is approved by the local ethics board 7. Consent, and, if applicable, assent, has been obtained according to institutional standards

    Other: This study does not include an intervention.

  • Patient/Caregiver dyad with re-RT for a recurrent brain tumour

    All of these criteria must be met for a patient to be eligible for this study: 1. Patient aged \>2 and \<21 years treated with a repeat course of radiation for a recurrent or progressive brain tumour (stratum 2). 2. Radiation for the first tumour must be a primary brain neoplasm (i.e. not leukemia). 3. Enrollment within 14 days of starting re-irradiation (RT2). 4. Patients with malignant transformation of the first tumour are eligible. 5. There are no restrictions on histology or RT1/RT2 dose-fractionation or RT2 body site. In other words, RT2 may be directed at a different location to RT1. 6. The patient is treated at a site where the study is approved by the local ethics board 7. Consent, and, if applicable, assent, has been obtained according to institutional standards

    Other: This study does not include an intervention.

Interventions

  • OtherThis study does not include an intervention.

    This study does not include an intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for children diagnosed with DIPG and in children treated with re-irradiation for a recurrent brain tumour

    Health-related quality-of-life will be measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) General Core Scales

    Time frame: 2 months after the second radiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. HRQOL disease specific modules and family impact

    PedsQL Brain Tumor and Family Impact Module

    Time frame: 2 months after the second radiation]

  2. Symptom burden for children diagnosed with DIPG and in children treated with re-irradiation for a recurrent brain tumour

    Symptom Screening in Pediatrics (SSPEDI)

    Time frame: 2 months after the second radiation]

  3. Caregiver HRQOL

    Short Form 36 (SF-36)

    Time frame: 2 months after the second radiation]

  4. Anxiety, Depression and Pain Interference

    Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Anxiety, Depression and Pain Interference Short Forms

    Time frame: 2 months after the second radiation]

  5. Radiation necrosis (RN), local control, progression-free survival and overall survival after re-irradiation.

    Radiation necrosis without obvious tumour progression

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility of conducting routine assessment of HRQOL in children diagnosed with DIPG/recurrent brain tumours and their caregivers.

    Recruitment (patients participating vs. patients eligible) and retention rates

    Time frame: 4 months after the second radiation

07

Study locations

13 sites
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Stollery Children's Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • British Columbia Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada
  • CancerCare Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9, Canada
  • IWK Health Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 6R8, Canada
  • McMaster Children's Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada
  • Children's Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
    Québec, G1V 4G2, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04670016
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
Collaborators
University of Toronto, Université de Montréal, University of Ottawa, Western University, Canada, McMaster University, Alberta Children's Hospital, Stollery Children's Hospital, British Columbia Children's Hospital, CancerCare Manitoba, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, The Hospital for Sick Children, McMaster Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, St. Justine's Hospital, Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC, IWK Health Centre, Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada, London Health Sciences Centre, The Ottawa Hospital, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Responsible party
Fiona Simone Maria Schulte (ssistant Professor in the Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology in the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2020
Start date
Jul 2, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025
Completion
Mar 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

Fiona Schulte, PhD
principal investigator · University of Calgary
Derek Tsang, MD
principal investigator · Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion