ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04663087PhoXSTATUpdated Dec 30, 2024Results posted

Feasibility of Evaluating XSTAT Use in the Prehospital Setting

An interventional study of XSTAT and Standard of Care in Shock, Hemorrhagic, Injury Penetrating and Hemorrhage, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-30.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor stopped enrollment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the prehospital use of the XSTAT device to control bleeding in junctional wounds. Participants will be randomized to the use of XSTAT versus standard care.

Read the detailed description

The XSTAT® device injects small, rapidly-expanding cellulose sponges into the wound cavity using a syringe-like delivery system. In the wound, XSTAT® sponges expand and swell to fill the wound cavity, within 20 seconds of contact with blood, facilitating compression of bleeding structures. XSTAT® can be applied through skin wounds. The system can readily access deep vascular structures. While rapidly hemostatic, the hemostatic sponges are also relatively easy to remove. In the setting of junctional bleeding, XSTAT® may allow for hemostatic pressure generation from within the wound tract rather than from external compression (as with a tourniquet or manual compression).

Hemorrhage should be controlled as early as possible, ideally before reaching a trauma center or medical treatment facility. Given its small size, low weight, and ease of application, the XSTAT® device is well-suited for prehospital use, in both the civilian and military setting, and this is probably where the device's applicability lies.

The investigators anticipate that a full-scale trial will be conducted based on the questions this pilot study addresses, including the following:

  1. the number of penetrating junctional zone injuries encountered in the prehospital civilian setting.
  2. the feasibility of randomizing patients in the prehospital setting.
  3. usability.
  4. safety.
  5. validation of the proposed primary outcome of an efficacy trial.
02

Conditions studied

  • Shock, Hemorrhagic
  • Injury Penetrating
  • Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • hemorrhagic shock
  • hemostatic sponge
  • penetrating injury
  • junctional wounds
  • prehospital
03

In context

Shock, Hemorrhagic

81 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Hemorrhagic; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 100 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Shock, Hemorrhagic.

Browse Shock, Hemorrhagic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,415 studies on the registry; 277 are open to participants now.

Of its 160 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥15 years or estimated body weight ≥50 kg.
  2. Penetrating junctional injury (femoral or axillary), with i. visible bleeding ii. too proximal to be controlled with a tourniquet
  3. Patient will be taken to participating level I trauma center, directly from the scene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prisoners, children \<15 years old, known pregnant patients.
  2. Patients receiving chest compressions (prior to XSTAT® use).
  3. Patients with an opt-out bracelet.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment with XSTAT

    Participants randomized to the treatment arm will be treated using the study device - XSTAT.

    Device: XSTAT

  • Other
    Standard Care

    Participants assigned to the control group receive standard prehospital care, consisting of direct pressure/dressings.

    Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • DeviceXSTAT

    XSTAT application will follow the manufacturer's guidance, with injection into bleeding junctional wounds. A sufficient number of sponges are used to fill the injury void. Repeated XSTAT application is performed in the event of persistent bleeding. The trial packs will contain two devices.

    Also known as: XSTAT 12

  • OtherStandard of Care

    As currently provided by EMS services

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Patients With Hemorrhage From Junctional Wounds

    The investigators will track the number of junctional wounds that are treated by participating EMS personnel versus the number of participants who were enrolled in this study. This will help the investigators understand how many wounds of this type happen, and how many would possibly benefit from the use of the XSTAT device.

    Time frame: Each participant was assessed at the time of arrival in hospital

  2. Record Blood Lactate Level Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  3. Base Deficit (mmol/l)

    Base excess and base deficit refer to an excess or deficit, respectively, in the amount of base present in the blood. The value is usually reported as a concentration in units of mEq/L (mmol/L), with positive numbers indicating an excess of base and negative a deficit. A typical reference range for base excess is -2 to +2 mEq/L. It is a test performed on a blood sample, venous or arterial. In trauma patients, a metabolic acidosis is indicative of the degree of shock, causing hypoperfusion. A more negative value indicates more severe acidosis, and more severe shock.

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  4. Record Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  5. Record Platelet Count Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  6. Record Prothrombin Time Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  7. Record International Normalized Ratio (INR) Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  8. Record Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) / Ratio Result

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  9. Record Thromboelastograph (TEG) Result if Available

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  10. Record Thromboelastogram (ROTEM) Result if Available

    Record results of routine test

    Time frame: Baseline - on admission

  11. Ease of Use of XSTAT Device by EMS Personnel

    To answer the question "Is the XSTAT device easy to use in the prehospital setting," the study case report forms capture whether EMS personnel found the device easy to insert into a wound, whether the sponges were expelled from the device easily, and whether the EMS personnel were satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device itself.

    Time frame: From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)

  12. Sponge Removal: Surgeon Opinion of Ease of Removal, Time Required to Remove Sponges, Use of X-rays, Whether Surgeon Was Satisfied or Dissatisfied With the XSTAT Device.

    Case report forms capture whether sponges were easy to remove, how much time was required to remove the sponges, whether x-rays were obtained to ensure that no sponges were left in the body, and whether the surgeon was satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device

    Time frame: From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)

  13. Adverse Events From Use of XSTAT Device

    All AEs, whether expected or unexpected will be recorded and reviewed throughout the trial. Each AE will be reported separately, with a description of the event, whether it was related to the device, whether it was serious, and whether it was expected or unexpected.

    Time frame: Randomization through first 7 days, unless discharged earlier

  14. Survival at 30 Days

    Time of death, or survival at 30 days will be recorded

    Time frame: Hospital admission through 30 days

07

Results

Posted Dec 11, 2024

Participant flow

This was a pilot/feasibility trial. The trial was conducted in the prehospital setting, and was an Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) study. Patients were to be enrolled by EMS agencies. Only one patient was enrolled.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Started01
Completed01
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Patients With Hemorrhage From Junctional Wounds

The investigators will track the number of junctional wounds that are treated by participating EMS personnel versus the number of participants who were enrolled in this study. This will help the investigators understand how many wounds of this type happen, and how many would possibly benefit from the use of the XSTAT device.

Time frame:
Each participant was assessed at the time of arrival in hospital
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Patients With Hemorrhage From Junctional Wounds
ParticipantsTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Incidence of Patients With Hemorrhage From Junctional Wounds01
PrimaryRecord Blood Lactate Level Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · mmol/l
Record Blood Lactate Level Result
mmol/lTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record Blood Lactate Level Result—3.5
PrimaryBase Deficit (mmol/l)

Base excess and base deficit refer to an excess or deficit, respectively, in the amount of base present in the blood. The value is usually reported as a concentration in units of mEq/L (mmol/L), with positive numbers indicating an excess of base and negative a deficit. A typical reference range for base excess is -2 to +2 mEq/L. It is a test performed on a blood sample, venous or arterial. In trauma patients, a metabolic acidosis is indicative of the degree of shock, causing hypoperfusion. A more negative value indicates more severe acidosis, and more severe shock.

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · mmol/l
Base Deficit (mmol/l)
mmol/lTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Base Deficit (mmol/l)—-2.1
PrimaryRecord Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · g/dL
Record Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Result
g/dLTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Result—12.7
PrimaryRecord Platelet Count Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · 10^9 platelets/L
Record Platelet Count Result
10^9 platelets/LTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record Platelet Count Result—267
PrimaryRecord Prothrombin Time Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · seconds
Record Prothrombin Time Result
secondsTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record Prothrombin Time Result—13.8
PrimaryRecord International Normalized Ratio (INR) Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · Ratio
Record International Normalized Ratio (INR) Result
RatioTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record International Normalized Ratio (INR) Result—1.1
PrimaryRecord Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) / Ratio Result

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission
Reported as:
Number · seconds
Record Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) / Ratio Result
secondsTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Record Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) / Ratio Result—27
PrimaryRecord Thromboelastograph (TEG) Result if Available

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryRecord Thromboelastogram (ROTEM) Result if Available

Record results of routine test

Time frame:
Baseline - on admission

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryEase of Use of XSTAT Device by EMS Personnel

To answer the question "Is the XSTAT device easy to use in the prehospital setting," the study case report forms capture whether EMS personnel found the device easy to insert into a wound, whether the sponges were expelled from the device easily, and whether the EMS personnel were satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device itself.

Time frame:
From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySponge Removal: Surgeon Opinion of Ease of Removal, Time Required to Remove Sponges, Use of X-rays, Whether Surgeon Was Satisfied or Dissatisfied With the XSTAT Device.

Case report forms capture whether sponges were easy to remove, how much time was required to remove the sponges, whether x-rays were obtained to ensure that no sponges were left in the body, and whether the surgeon was satisfied or dissatisfied with the XSTAT device

Time frame:
From baseline to 29 months (enrollment phase)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryAdverse Events From Use of XSTAT Device

All AEs, whether expected or unexpected will be recorded and reviewed throughout the trial. Each AE will be reported separately, with a description of the event, whether it was related to the device, whether it was serious, and whether it was expected or unexpected.

Time frame:
Randomization through first 7 days, unless discharged earlier

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySurvival at 30 Days

Time of death, or survival at 30 days will be recorded

Time frame:
Hospital admission through 30 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Survival at 30 Days
participantsTreatment With XSTATStandard Care
Survival at 30 Days—1

Adverse events

Collected over From admission to the level 1 trauma center until time of discharge from the level 1 trauma center, typically 28 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment With XSTAT———
Standard Care0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Only one patient was enrolled; additional data not provided to preserve confidentiality

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Treatment With XSTATStandard CareTotal
<=18 years—00
Between 18 and 65 years—11
>=65 years—00
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Treatment With XSTATStandard CareTotal
Count of participants—NANA
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Treatment With XSTATStandard CareTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UAB Hospital
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Stephens SW, Farley P, Collins SP, Wong MD, Panas AB, Dennis BM, Richmond N, Inaba K, Brown KN, Holcomb JB, Jansen JO. Multicenter social media community consultation for an exception from informed consent trial of the XStat device (PhoXStat trial). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Feb 1;92(2):442-446. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003425. PubMed 34620774 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 23, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2022 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 7 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 7, 2019
First posted
Dec 10, 2020
StartActual
Oct 29, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jun 21, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 11, 2023
Results first posted
Dec 11, 2024
Last update
Dec 30, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04663087
Responsible party
Jan O. Jansen (Primary Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2020
Start date
Oct 29, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 21, 2023
Completion
Aug 11, 2023
Results posted
Dec 11, 2024
Last update
Dec 30, 2024

Study contacts

Jan Jansen, MBBS, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion