ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04650893Updated Aug 23, 2024Results posted

The Effect of IV NSAID's and Corticosteroids on Dysphasia and Dysphonia Following ASDF

A Phase 3 interventional study of Intravenous Ketorolac and Intravenous Dexamethasone in Dysphagia and Dysphonia, sponsored by University of Nebraska. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-23.

Sponsored by University of Nebraska · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Poor compliance with data collection - too many intervals.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 230 studies in Deglutition Disorders with a site in United States — 45 open to participants now, 50 under way, none of them phase 3. Deglutition Disorders · United States.

Enrollment
101st of 165
33 · median 50
Started
2021
with 16 others
Phase 3
6 of 230
none open now
Registered
155th of 230
by date

Among the 230 studies in Deglutition Disorders with a site in United States, this one is the 101st largest by enrollment of the 165 interventional ones, is one of 17 that started in 2021, is one of 6 in phase 3, and was the 155th registered.

By phase

230 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase118 · 33 open
Observational64 · 7 open
Phase 218 · 4 open
Phase 18 · 0 open
Phase 2/36 · 0 open
Phase 3this study6 · 0 open
Phase 1/25 · 0 open
Phase 45 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1979; this study’s year is marked. 17 started in 2021.

Size and results

Median enrollment 50 across the 165 interventional studies, 66 across the 64 observational. Of the 154 that completed or were terminated, 53 (34%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 230 studies in Deglutition Disorders with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study is to assess the efficacy of intra-operative intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (Ketorolac) versus intravenous (dexamethasone) administration on dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of two intra-operative, intravenous medications on dysphagia and dysphonia following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The medications include Ketorolac, an anti-inflammatory versus dexamethasone, a corticosteroid. Eligibility criteria includes adults aged 19 years of age or older who are scheduled to undergo a ACDF for radiculopathy or myelopathy. Participants will be recruited for a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical drug study and randomized into three cohorts: (1) control (no steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID), (2) IV NSAID(1-time dose of 30mg of IV Ketorolac at time of closure), and (3) IV steroid (1-time dose of 10mg of IV dexamethasone at the time of closure. The primary outcome measures are patient questionnaires which include the EAT-10 and Bazaz classification for dysphagia and VHI-10 for dysphonia. In addition, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) will also be collected. Research follow-up will be subject completed questionnaires to be collected pre-operatively and then post operation at day 1, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Post operative questionnaires may be collected at time of patient follow-up in clinic, by phone or mail.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dysphagia
  • Dysphonia
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 19 years of age and older
  • Undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • No known allergies or sensitivities to or non-steroidal medications

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Procedure is being done for revision, trauma, infection or tumor
  • Patients with known diagnosed metabolic diseases (diabetes, pancreatitis, gout, electrolyte imbalances, hypertension, hematological abnormalities including gastrointestinal bleeding...)
  • Patients with known kidney disease or a creatinine level above the >1.27
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    no steroid or non steroidal anti-inflammatory

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Ketorolac

    one time dose of 30mg of IV Ketorolac at time of closure

    Drug: Intravenous Ketorolac

  • Active comparator
    dexamethasone

    one time dose of 10mg of IV dexamethasone at the time of closure

    Drug: Intravenous Dexamethasone

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification

    The Bazaz grading system (0-none; 1-Mild; 2-Moderate; 3-Severe) is used for dysphagia evaluation

    Time frame: one year

  2. Percentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)

    Percentage of patients with severe dysphagia based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).Scores on the EAT-10 greater than 15 are indicative of severe dysphonia.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).

    Scores on the VHI-10 greater than 11 are indicative of clinically significant dysphonia.

    Time frame: one year

  2. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10 item pain intensity and daily activity questionnaire that measures daily limitations after cervical spine injury. There are 10 sections, and each section contains 6 statements.The statements are scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. 0: No disability or difficulty 1. Mild disability or difficulty 2. Moderate disability or difficulty 3. Severe disability or difficulty 4. Very severe disability or difficulty 5. Complete disability or difficulty Total Score: The scores from each of the 10 sections are summed to calculate the total score. The maximum possible score is 50, which would indicate severe disability, while a score of 0 indicates no disability.

    Time frame: one year

Other outcomes

  1. Median Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain

    The Visual analogue scale is a line with numbers underneath it, with extremes marked "no pain" score of 0 (left) and the "worst pain imaginable" score of 10 (right).

    Time frame: one year

07

Results

Posted Aug 23, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Started111012
Completed001
Not completed111011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up111011

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification

The Bazaz grading system (0-none; 1-Mild; 2-Moderate; 3-Severe) is used for dysphagia evaluation

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification
percentage of participantsControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Percentage of Patients With Moderate/Severe Bazaz Classification20200
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)

Percentage of patients with severe dysphagia based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).Scores on the EAT-10 greater than 15 are indicative of severe dysphonia.

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
percentage of participantsControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Percentage of Patients With Severe Dysphagia Based on the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)2000
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).

Scores on the VHI-10 greater than 11 are indicative of clinically significant dysphonia.

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).
percentage of participantsControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10).02025
SecondaryMean Neck Disability Index (NDI)

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a 10 item pain intensity and daily activity questionnaire that measures daily limitations after cervical spine injury. There are 10 sections, and each section contains 6 statements.The statements are scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating complete disability. 0: No disability or difficulty 1. Mild disability or difficulty 2. Moderate disability or difficulty 3. Severe disability or difficulty 4. Very severe disability or difficulty 5. Complete disability or difficulty Total Score: The scores from each of the 10 sections are summed to calculate the total score. The maximum possible score is 50, which would indicate severe disability, while a score of 0 indicates no disability.

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)
score on a scaleControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI)13.2 (1 to 28)16.2 (3 to 38)3.75 (0 to 9)
Other pre-specifiedMedian Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain

The Visual analogue scale is a line with numbers underneath it, with extremes marked "no pain" score of 0 (left) and the "worst pain imaginable" score of 10 (right).

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Median Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain
score on a scaleControlKetorolacDexamethasone
Median Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain2.6 (0 to 6)3.4 (0 to 6)1.75 (0 to 4)

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Ketorolac0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Dexamethasone0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline was less than desired due to closure of study because follow-up was poor.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlKetorolacDexamethasoneTotal
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlKetorolacDexamethasoneTotal
Female74516
Male46717
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlKetorolacDexamethasoneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0011
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White11101132
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Number of participants per study arm
Number of participants per study arm(Participants)ControlKetorolacDexamethasoneTotal
Count of participants11101233
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lauritzen Outpatient Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2024, 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 12, 2020
First posted
Dec 3, 2020
StartActual
Jan 2, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 8, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 8, 2023
Results first posted
Aug 23, 2024
Last update
Aug 23, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04650893
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2020
Start date
Jan 2, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 8, 2023
Completion
Dec 8, 2023
Results posted
Aug 23, 2024
Last update
Aug 23, 2024

Study contacts

Kevin Garvin, MD
study chair · University of Nebraska

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ketorolac · Dexamethasone

Start the discussion