CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04643782Updated Feb 14, 2023Results posted

Comparative Study of the ANNE™ One System to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea

An interventional study of ANNE Sleep in Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-14.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
287
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the ANNE Sleep system for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults

Read the detailed description

The main object of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the ANNE Sleep system for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults. Our primary hypothesis is that the ANNE Sleep system is non-inferior compared to polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea of Adult
03

In context

Apnea

1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 287 is above the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.

Browse Apnea studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. ≥22 years old.
  2. Subjects with suspected OSA based on history and physical who qualify for, and have either a PSG or HSAT ordered, as determined by their regular provider. Subjects with self-reported symptoms of OSA based on the STOP-Bang questionnaire indicating affirmative answers to any of the following: snoring, daytime fatigue/sleepiness/tiredness, partners who have observed the subject stopping breathing or choking/gasping during sleep. Persons with a previous diagnosis of OSA are also eligible.
  3. Willingness to give written consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. An unstable medical condition, acute or chronic, that in the opinion of the investigator puts the subject at health risks related to this trial or interferes with the clinical trial and data collection
  2. Inability to understand instructions
  3. Has a skin abnormality that precludes assessment
  4. Has a history of dementia
  5. Patients with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators
  6. Subject is pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy over the expected course of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
287 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single Arm Study

    After consent, subjects will wear the ANNE sleep system during an attended PSG study for 1 night.

    Device: ANNE Sleep

Interventions

  • DeviceANNE Sleep

    ANNE sleep system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Diagnosis Using ANNE Sleep System Compared to Polysomnography

    The diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA by determining a patient's Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) using the ANNE Sleep system compared to Polysomnography (PSG) over one (1) night worn concurrently. Sensitivity is the number of true positives divided by the sum of the number of true positives and false negatives. Specificity is the number of true negatives divided by the sum of the number of true negatives and false positives.

    Time frame: 1 night

07

Results

Posted Feb 14, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneANNE Sleep System
Started287
Completed225
Not completed62

Outcome measures

PrimarySensitivity and Specificity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Diagnosis Using ANNE Sleep System Compared to Polysomnography

The diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA by determining a patient's Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) using the ANNE Sleep system compared to Polysomnography (PSG) over one (1) night worn concurrently. Sensitivity is the number of true positives divided by the sum of the number of true positives and false negatives. Specificity is the number of true negatives divided by the sum of the number of true negatives and false positives.

Time frame:
1 night
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of true cases
Sensitivity and Specificity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Diagnosis Using ANNE Sleep System Compared to Polysomnography
percentage of true casesSingle Arm Study
Sensitivity89.7 (79.9 to 95.8)
Specificity97.5 (93.6 to 99.3)

Adverse events

Collected over One night of sleep.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Single Arm Study0/225 (0%)0/225 (0%)0/225 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Single Arm Study
Mean52.7 ± 14.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Single Arm Study
Female127
Male98
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm Study
Hispanic or Latino19
Not Hispanic or Latino202
Unknown or Not Reported4
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm Study
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian20
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American26
White164
More than one race10
Unknown or Not Reported3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Single Arm Study
United States225
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital
    Lake Forest, Illinois 60045, United States
  • Carle Foundation Hosipital
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • Central Dupage Hospital (CDH)
    Winfield, Illinois 60190, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Davies C, Lee JY, Walter J, Kim D, Yu L, Park J, Blake S, Kalluri L, Cziraky M, Stanek E, Miller J, Harty BJ, Schauer J, Rangel SM, Serao A, Edel C, Ran DS, Olagbenro MO, Lim A, Gill K, Cooksey J, Toloui O, Power T, Xu S, Zee P. A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Dec 1;18(12):2703-2712. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10194. PubMed 35934926 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 13, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Sep 13, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data stored and used for future research will be de-identified. Data will not be used for future research outside of the scope of this study.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04643782
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
Sibel Health Inc.
Responsible party
Phyllis Zee (Principal Investigator, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2020
Start date
May 11, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 17, 2021
Completion
Dec 27, 2021
Results posted
Feb 14, 2023
Last update
Feb 14, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion