CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04639037COMAP-ICUUpdated May 3, 2022

Control Mean Arterial Pressure in the Intensive Care Unit

An interventional study of Automated adjustment of vasopressor and Manual adjustment of vasopressor in Hypotension, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-03.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare two different strategies of postoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) management (manual versus automated) in patients who underwent a major surgery and admitted in the intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit for postoperative care. The investigators hypothesis is that the automated group will spend more time in a predetermined target MAP range of 80-90 mmHg compared to the manual group.

Read the detailed description

Although the correction of hypotension during the perioperative period should be a key goal, approximately 40% of overall mortality is still closely linked to the presence of perioperative hypotension which is responsible for significant morbidity particularly in patients undergoing major surgery. Indeed, inadequate management of perioperative hypotension remains an undeniable risk factor for morbidity and mortality. However, management of perioperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) is still suboptimal today. Indeed, the analysis of our database demonstrates that, on average, patient spends only 50-60 % of the treatment time within the predetermined MAP target. In about 10% of the treatment time, the patient is under-treated (hypotension) and 30% of the time, the patient is over-treated (hypertension).

The correction of hypotension is achieved using vasopressor drugs (mainly norepinephrine infusion). In 2017 a study published in the JAMA shows that patients with tightly controlled arterial pressure have fewer organ dysfunctions than those with standard blood pressure management. However, maintaining MAP within a narrow range involves regular manual adjustments of norepinephrine infusion doses by intensive care unit nurses. When a hypotension occurs, there is usually two main possible treatments (fluid or vasopressors). In the operating room, for patients undergoing major surgery, we usually optimize fluid and vasopressor titration using an advanced hemodynamic monitoring device "EV1000 monitor" (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine USA).This monitoring device can also be connected to a computer that controls a norepinephrine infusion pump in order to tightly adjust the infusion of norepinephrine to the target MAP predetermined by the clinician in charge of the patients. We have recently demonstrated that the use of such system resulted in less intraoperative time in hypotension compared to manual management. However, in the postoperative period, in patients admitted in the intensive care unit after a major surgery and requiring tight control of MAP, such demonstration is still lacking.

Therefore, the objective of this randomized controlled superiority study is to demonstrate that, in patients admitted to intensive care unit or post-anesthesia care unit after a major surgery, tight control of MAP using a closed-loop system for vasopressor administration will result in MAP being more often within a predetermined MAP range of 80-90 mmHg compared to the same management without this automated closed-loop system (nurse adjustment of vasopressor administration).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypotension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intraoperative hypotension
  • intensive care unit
  • hemodynamic management
03

In context

Hypotension

1,003 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypotension; 173 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 53 is below the median of 80 across 675 interventional studies indexed under Hypotension.

Browse Hypotension studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult Patients (>18 years)
  • Patients in the intensive care or post-anesthesia care unit after a major surgery and requiring norepinephrine infusion to maintain a MAP of 80-90 mmHg.
  • Patients equipped with an advanced hemodynamic monitoring device as standard of care during the surgery.
  • Patient with a social security number

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients refusing to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Manual adjustment of vasopressor

    Fluid and vasopressor will be managed as standard practice guided by the EV1000 monitoring device (manually infusion of both fluid and vasopressors) Objective being to maintain MAP within a target MAP range of 80-90 mmHg (fluid will be optimized and stroke volume index will be maintained within normal values)

    Device: Manual adjustment of vasopressor

  • Experimental
    Automated adjustment of vasopressor

    Fluid will be managed using the EV1000 monitoring in order to optimize stroke volume index and vasopressor will be automatically deliver by a closed-loop system to maintain the MAP within the target range of 80-90 mmHg

    Device: Automated adjustment of vasopressor

Interventions

  • DeviceAutomated adjustment of vasopressor

    The objective of this randomized controlled superiority study is to demonstrate that, in patients admitted to intensive care after a major surgery, tight control of MAP using a closed-loop system for vasopressor administration will result in MAP being more often within a MAP range of 80-90 mmHg compared to the same management without this automated closed-loop system (nurse adjustment of vasopressor administration)

  • DeviceManual adjustment of vasopressor

    Fluid and vasopressor will be delivered as standard of care (manual adjustment of both fluid and vasopressor infusion rate by the nurse)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of treatment time with a mean arterial pressure within 80-90 mmHg

    Percentage of treatment time in target (defined as a mean arterial pressure within 80-90 mmHg)

    Time frame: at DAY 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of treatment time in hypertension (MAP > 90 mmHg)

    Percentage of treatment time in hypertension (defined as a MAP \> 90 mmHg)

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  2. Percentage of treatment time in hypotension (MAP < 80 mmHg)

    Percentage of treatment time in hypotension (defined as a MAP \< 80 mmHg)

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  3. Percentage of treatment time in hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg)

    Percentage of treatment time in hypotension (defined as a MAP \< 65 mmHg) which is the usual population target to correct

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  4. Volume of fluid during the treatment time

    Volume of fluid during the treatment time

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  5. Amount of vasopressor used during the treatment time

    total amount of vasopressor (norepinephrine) used during the treatment time to maintain MAP within 80-90 mmHg

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  6. Length of stay in the intensive care unit

    length of stay in the intensive care unit (discharge at the discretion of the clinician in charge of the patient and not involved in the study protocol)

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

Other outcomes

  1. mean Stroke volume index during the treatment time

    mean stroke volume index during the treatment time

    Time frame: at DAY 0

  2. mean Cardiax index during the treatment time

    mean cardiac index during the treatment time

    Time frame: at DAY 0

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Bicêtre Hospital
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
  • Paul Brousse Hospital
    Villejuif, 94800, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04639037
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
University of California, Irvine, University of California, Los Angeles, Erasme University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 20, 2020
Start date
Jan 8, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 26, 2022
Completion
Jan 26, 2022
Last update
May 3, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion