CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04625790Updated Aug 9, 2022

Speech Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy in Post-stroke Anomic Aphasia

An interventional study of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and Speech therapy in Aphasia, Aphasia, Anomic and Stroke, sponsored by Ege University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-09.

Sponsored by Ege University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to observe the effects of speech therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy in patients who develop anomic aphasia after stroke. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly divided into groups. In the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment group, a total of 10 sessions, 1 session per day, will be applied to the right inferior frontal gyrus area with a frequency of 1 Hz for 20 minutes. The control group patients will be given speech therapy in the same way, but no active magnetic stimulation will be given in rTMS sessions (sham application). Speech therapy will be given to each patient by the same physiotherapist, and the treatment will last a total of 10 days, 60 minutes a day. Minimental test (MMT), Ege aphasia test, aphasia quality of life scale (SAQOL-39) will be filled in to the patients before and after the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphasia
  • Aphasia, Anomic
  • Stroke
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Stroke diagnosed with cranial MR examination causing unilateral hemiplegia
  • Post-stroke patients with anomic aphasia
  • 40-70 years
  • Being able to read the basic instructions
  • Medically and neurologically stable patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical condition that will constitute a contraindication to TMS (metallic implant, Cardiac pacemaker, pregnancy, breastfeeding, epilepsy, head trauma...)
  • Having previously had TMS treatment
  • Presence of Life-threatening disease and/or active systemic disease (chronic disease, malignancy ...)
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
  • Presence of neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding status
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Having a history of previous epilepsy
  • Visual and auditory impairment
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study group

    After randomization, this group will take 10 sessions of 1-Hz low frequency rTMS will be applied to the inferior frontal gyrus of the right frontal lobe for 20 minutes during the stroke treatment process before 10 days of speech therapy. Speech therapy will be given to each patient by the same therapist who is qualified in this field, and the treatment will last 10 days, 60 minutes a day.

    Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation · Other: Speech therapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    This group will take 10 sessions of sham rTMS for 20 minutes during the stroke treatment process before 10 days of speech therapy. The sham therapy will consist of positioning the coil on the cranium at the same spot, but without a magnetic stimulation, only with the device open and the sounds will be audible. Speech therapy will be given to each patient by the same therapist who is qualified in this field, and the treatment will last 10 days, 60 minutes a day.

    Other: Speech therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(TMS) has been used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in the treatment of many neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, myelopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, movement disorders, epilepsy, and depression. It is a way to stimulate the targeted areas in the cerebral cortex without invasive methods. The application of TMS in the aphasia usually consists of repetitive stimulations, in order to activate or deactivate the target area. In this study, 10 sessions of 1-Hz low frequency rTMS for 20 minutes will be applied to the inferior frontal gyrus of the right frontal lobe.

  • OtherSpeech therapy

    Speech therapy will be given to each patient by the same therapist, and the treatment will last 10 days, 60 minutes a day. It will consist of exercises to improve the articulation and comprehension.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ege Aphasia Test

    Ege aphasia test (EAT): The test battery acquired in 2011 and used in the study consists of 8 subtests: speech style and characteristics, apraxia assessment, auditory / verbal comprehension, repetition, naming, visual understanding / reading, drawing figures / writing / sentences, mathematics. Although there is variability in the scoring of the EAT according to the subtests, generally 0 points are given to correct answers, and 1, 2 or more points are given to repeated and incorrect answers. The validity and reliability of the test was shown in 2013 by Atamaz et al.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale ( SAQOL-39 )

    Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale(SAQOL-39): This scale consists of 4 subscales (physical, communication, psychosocial and energy) and 39 items. Its validity, reliability and usability have been proven in individuals who develop aphasia after stroke. The overall score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores being associated with better outcomes.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Mini Mental Test(MMT)

    Mini mental test includes 5 domains: Orientation, recording memory, attention and calculation, recall and language. It consists of 11 items and is evaluated over the total score of 30. Traditionally, scores between 24 and 30 are considered normal. A score below 24 indicates cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Ege University Faculty of Medicine
    İzmir, 35100, Turkey
07

References and documents

Publications

  • 1- Öge EA. Nöroloji, İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Temel ve Klinik Bilimler Ders Kitapları. Nobel Tıp, 2004. 2- Balkan S. Serebrovasküler hastalıklar. Güneş kitabevi , Ankara 2002 3- Atamaz Çalış, F., "Dil İşlevleri ve Testleri", Klinik Nöropsikoloji ve Nöropsikiyatrik Hastalıklar, ed. E. Kumral, 287-324, Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri, 2013 4- Sinanović O, Mrkonjić Z, Zukić S, Vidović M, Imamović K. Post-stroke language disorders. Acta Clin Croat. 2011 Mar;50(1):79-94. 5- Bakheit AM. Drug treatment of poststroke aphasia. Future drugs, expert review of neurotherapeutics 2004. 6- Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5:CD000425 7- Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7. 8- Barker AT. The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation. In: Pascual-Leone A, Davey NJ, Rothwell J, Wassermann EM, Puri BK (Eds). Handbook of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, 2002, pp 3-17. 9- Chung MG, Lo WD. Noninvasive brain stimulation: the potential for use in the rehabilitation of pediatric acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S129-37. 10- Hu X yan, Zhang T, Rajah GB, et al. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Neurol Res. 2018;40(6):459-465. doi:10.1080/01616412.2018.1453980 11- Rubi-Fessen I, Hartmann A, Huber W, et al. Add-on Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Subacute Aphasia Therapy: Enhanced Improvement of Functional Communication and Basic Linguistic Skills. A Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(11):1935- 1944.e2. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.017 12- Calis Atamaz F, Yağız On A, Durmaz B. Validity and Reliability of a New Test for Turkish-Speaking Aphasic Patients: Ege Aphasia Test . Neurorehab 2013;32(1):157-63 13- Atamaz Calis F, Celik S, Demir O, Aykanat D, Yagiz On A. The psychometric properties of the Turkish Stroke and Aphasia Quality Of Life Scale-39. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Jun;39(2):140-4. 14- Dergisi P. Cornell Demansta Depresyon Ölçeği'nin Türk Yaşlı Toplumunda Geçerlik ve Güvenilirliği. Depression. 2003;14(4):263-271.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04625790
Lead sponsor
Ege University
Responsible party
Kadir Kara M.D (Physician, Researcher, Ege University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2020
Start date
Nov 6, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2021
Completion
Nov 6, 2021
Last update
Aug 9, 2022

Study contacts

Kadir Kara, MD
principal investigator · Ege University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion